And yet, we're not the ones who came busting in here with the ALL CAPS tabloid news flash. You were. Come to think of it, the people who try to stir this junk up every time and "confront" everyone with the "real truth" about the statistics always seem to be the guys who want everyone to be bigger than they are, so maybe the real question is- what do you get out of that?
The Most Important Penis Size Study Ever Done!!!!
- Thread starter cockboiii
- Start date
-
- Tags
- penis size stanford study
And yet, we're not the ones who came busting in here with the ALL CAPS tabloid news flash. You were. Come to think of it, the people who try to stir this junk up every time and "confront" everyone with the "real truth" about the statistics always seem to be the guys who want everyone to be bigger than they are, so maybe the real question is- what do you get out of that?
I think the answer is the TRUTH. IF I truly believed 5.3 was average that would be great for me - but the true reality is i've hardly ever seen a dick that small. Guys here want to feel "big" so love that number bc they're bigger than it nearly 100% of the time. I think we need to look at what's wrong with those studies bc any gay man will tell you the average is way bigger than 5.3 inches.
Evenflow618
Superior Member
A
Are you sure? Many women say it’s correct in my circle most men are around 5 to 6 inches. With decent amount of girth. Even my gf gay friends say the same. Plus, most people overestimate a big penis too.
I think the real problem is simply that true length measurements don't usually mesh with much of anything in the penis world, and that's what the studies are typically using. The person holding the ruler doesn't care how long someone's dick is if they measure the outside curve or point it downward. The ruler is not thrown off by how tiny a guy's waist is, his body fat, or how impressive his dick looks from the right angle or through a particular camera lens. Lots of factors will make us overestimate other people's dicks, but in the end, if the guy didn't stand up with his dick sticking straight out and a ruler on top, you won't always know what he would be under those conditions, which is exactly what they'd pin him at if he showed up at one of those studies, and I can't imagine they're all involved in some big conspiracy to raise our self esteem. I'm just as guilty when watching porn, but I understand that there are so many things at play, the least of which being that I'm seeing much of it under conditions and from a perspective I won't get when I look down at the same boring old dick I see every day. You just have to accept that things aren't always what they appear and try to keep the "wow factor" in check.
First: just bc i took the bait "It all sounds so formal and they went crazy with statistics without testing to see if it's actually good science, i.e., is it described well enough that anyone could duplicate the study and get the same results. " - ummm dude that's called science.
One of the most interesting things about this study is it shows that "stretched" length isn't nearly as big as actual erections. The 5.3 number goes off of stretched lenghts. Any guy knows that his "stretched" dick doesn't nearly equal his erect size. We also know that even with an erection we can be up to an inch bigger if really hard.
One of the most interesting things about this study is it shows that "stretched" length isn't nearly as big as actual erections. The 5.3 number goes off of stretched lenghts. Any guy knows that his "stretched" dick doesn't nearly equal his erect size. We also know that even with an erection we can be up to an inch bigger if really hard.
Horseshit? Bullshit? Shit anyway ..
So one of the latest studies is the one with the largest number of participants 14.597. This is an excerpt:
Nowhere near the claimed 16 cm. That is strange, isn’t it?
And for your clearly non-scientific study, that stretched is always shorter (up to an inch). Last time I measured my stretched length was 2 cm longer than my erect length
So one of the latest studies is the one with the largest number of participants 14.597. This is an excerpt:
Nowhere near the claimed 16 cm. That is strange, isn’t it?
And for your clearly non-scientific study, that stretched is always shorter (up to an inch). Last time I measured my stretched length was 2 cm longer than my erect length
- Joined
- May 31, 2018
- Posts
- 3,626
- Media
- 45
- Likes
- 13,066
- Points
- 433
- Location
- Los Angeles, California, US
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 69% Straight, 31% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Same here, but I'm not sure how much. As has been brought up here before, I think one of the problems there is that no "medical staff" or whatever is likely to feel as comfortable pulling on our dicks as hard as we ourselves might do it. Hopefully there's at least some means of keeping consistent pressure from person to person, but it's probably a bit low overall.
Hoops? Holes in the ‘scientific’ study you provided. Just within a minute or 10 mostly due to the slow responding site I found 2 major issues in the 2 randomly selected studies. One where the average found was even less than 5.3 inches, and one which was self measured (of which that ‘scientific’ study claimed to have excluded those).
But all you can come up with is this? Yep. I am over 5.3 inches, but that was one of the reasons for joining this site.
But whatever floats your boat. May I suggest to launch a site named 6inchisaverage.com and exclude all people with a member less than 6 inches? And then do a poll on that site? You might get highly satisfying results!
"The average penis length has increased over the past 30 years, a new study has revealed, but experts warn it might not be the ideal reality every man’s dreamed of.
As it turns out, size does matter. Researchers fear the phallic inflation is due to unhealthy habits, like binging junk food or being mostly sedentary, or even pollution."
So that explains it. All along I've been a health fanatic, eating the right things, almost a vegan. . . Turns out I'd be hung like a horse instead of a chipmunk if I'd had unhealthy habits and a poor diet! Better hide this from my wife. If she thinks there's anything in this, she's gonna instantly start me on a strict Twinky and MacDonald's diet.
As it turns out, size does matter. Researchers fear the phallic inflation is due to unhealthy habits, like binging junk food or being mostly sedentary, or even pollution."
So that explains it. All along I've been a health fanatic, eating the right things, almost a vegan. . . Turns out I'd be hung like a horse instead of a chipmunk if I'd had unhealthy habits and a poor diet! Better hide this from my wife. If she thinks there's anything in this, she's gonna instantly start me on a strict Twinky and MacDonald's diet.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2023
- Posts
- 111
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 339
- Points
- 178
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
The things that "Researchers fear" are increasing size are things that have been shown to negatively affect erection quality. Habits that make it increasingly difficult to find or even reach one's penis.
I for 1, agree 1000 percent with you man. The big guys (everyone here) want your you to believe the average is around 5 to 6 inches. That makes them the undoubtedly "top dogs" by a huge margin! Why? It's our male ego man. To all you truly big guys...has your partners ever expressed to you that you're small? Verbally or not? You guys aren't stupid you can tell disappointment or otherwise through body language. I flip flops from thinking I'm so small to thinking I'm actually average and that it doesn't matter. Woman can FUCK you up mentally this I KNOW (mentally at least).
Explain one thing to me for the nay sayers, why are the dildos they sell extra thick and long??? They like being stretched out duh I can't put all woman into one basket they all have "preferences" in the end. There is a saying "it's not the size of the boat but the motion in the ocean" also "it takes a long time time to get to Europe in a row boat". If a big guy has great "motion skills" and checks all criteria of a woman...SHE WILL CHOOSE BIG DICK. The thing is, I think, most woman hate to be seen as thaaat shallow. Some really aren't and God bless those woman. Some are just fake.
It's been a while since I heard it, but it seemed like the most popular ones that were actually bought by women weren't much more than above average. I'm thinking the member "Fade" that used to be around here sold them, and that may have come from her, but I've heard things to that effect several times.
Consider that most woman dont know the difference between BP and NBP and gauge size on what is visible. This would mean most men these women have seen are in the BP 6" to 7" range given that most men have an approximate 1" +/- fat pad.
Curious as you appear to be fairly good sized. What is your bone pressed length and girth? Maybe I should change my handle to SmallerDguy as you look bigger than me.
PM if you dont want to post here.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2023
- Posts
- 111
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 339
- Points
- 178
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
"Gauge size on what is visible" To simplify, if you have two cylinders of equal length but differing girth, unless side by side, the fatter one will be perceived as shorter. Most people are poor at estimates of anything, and have nothing standard they know of for comparison. (average female palm width: 3", average male: 3.5", me: 3.75")
On fat pad depth, I once read that every 35 lbs. overweight is .75" of fat pad. I started measuring BP when I was 58 lbs. overweight. Quarter-inch difference between NBP and BP. Lost the weight, same difference.
Fat deposition there likely varies by individual and body type.
This is like one of my students asking if the tendon in our wrists will shrink and be useless in the future because its needed for writing with a pen or pencil and since we type everything now on phones and computers, then that tendon in our wrist won't be needed and natural selection will select for wrists that don't have that tendon because we type now.
A man last name Lamarck postulated that change in a species happened because a parent did something to their body that then changed their offspring. Classic example: giraffe. Giraffe grazed on trees. They had short necks and could only eat the lower leaves. Some giraffe, however, stretched their necks to reach higher leaves. They did lengthen their necks as they tried their whole life to reach higher leaves. That giraffe's offspring, then, has a slightly longer neck than its peers due to its parent's struggles with leaves. As the time passed, giraffe continued to stretch for leaves until, viola, we have our long necked giraffes of today.
That's also like saying I can lift weights, get huge, then have a kid, and my kid will be muscular.
If anyone thinks that human penises have actually increased by almost 25% in just a few decades, you are an idiot who needs to go back to school. This is NOT how human evolution happens, nor any evolution. Short term changes in diet and habit, sure. But physical change like this, so that statistically speaking, all male humans are trending on having larger penises, this does not happen, physically, in decades. This kind of clinal change would take thousands of years.
A man last name Lamarck postulated that change in a species happened because a parent did something to their body that then changed their offspring. Classic example: giraffe. Giraffe grazed on trees. They had short necks and could only eat the lower leaves. Some giraffe, however, stretched their necks to reach higher leaves. They did lengthen their necks as they tried their whole life to reach higher leaves. That giraffe's offspring, then, has a slightly longer neck than its peers due to its parent's struggles with leaves. As the time passed, giraffe continued to stretch for leaves until, viola, we have our long necked giraffes of today.
That's also like saying I can lift weights, get huge, then have a kid, and my kid will be muscular.
If anyone thinks that human penises have actually increased by almost 25% in just a few decades, you are an idiot who needs to go back to school. This is NOT how human evolution happens, nor any evolution. Short term changes in diet and habit, sure. But physical change like this, so that statistically speaking, all male humans are trending on having larger penises, this does not happen, physically, in decades. This kind of clinal change would take thousands of years.
I am 5.5 inches in length without bone pressing or cheating of any sort. For instance no measurements off to the side, tape measurements even though I have a curve, just straight ruler on top coming straight out of my body standing up. My girth without a pump is 4.8 midshaft 5 inches at the base and slightly less than 4.8 towards the head. It's the reason I really wish I had a huge head. I really cannot feel much inside some woman. It just kind of slip and slides in, no friction no snugness. It's rare for me to find the right fit for my size.
Similar threads
