To the extent that being endowed has "some social gravitas," it only does so among a select few who are not female and not straight men.
Willing To Admit Big Dick Superiority
- Thread starter thickcock82
- Start date
As long as you view homo sapiens thru rose-colored glasses then yes.
On the contrary. The "rose-colored glasses" causes one to see a large penis as the only determinant of "superiority." The rest of us make fun of the guy wearing the rose-colored glasses because they look ridiculous.
No, i don't see any group or person as inherently better. And? Your point isn't even logically connected to mine. Your goofy brain often does this. Maybe they don't teach English or even common sense from whichever US state you're from. In my country, they're in special schools, not normal schools. Moreover, I'm entitled to my opinion. your goofy brain cnanot process that.
jjonesdelano
Cherished Member
I have friend in which we are both straight and were coworkers. One night I was over at his place with my gf having beer around fire. Her and I got into bit of disagreement. She wanted to go into town to smokes, well my friend goes with to console her. They take longer than expected. She tells me the next morning, that my friend pulled it his cock in the car and he had a big 8" cock, she had to suck it. She had cucked me before, so it was not a big deal expect this was with a good friend of mine. Me and my friend never talked about it, but he knew he easily got my gf to suck his big dick and was not hard for him to know I was much smaller by the way she reacted to his cock. That changed the dynamic... He had superior big cock and he treated me a bit different, knowing I was much smaller. I also subconsciously treated him as superior as well
Whereas I do not disagree with your response, the U.S. state in which I was educated taught English in such a manner that written sentences do not end in prepositions (e.g., "whichever US state you're from"), do not begin with lowercase letters (e.g., "your goofy brain..."), and do not misspell "cannot" as "cnanot." If you're going to denigrate an educational system, then at least cover your own tracks with a bit of proofreading.
Tell that to the straight girls who tell their friends about the huge cock they just landed. Or who share pictures of the big ones. Or the straight men who become jealous, angry, or submissive because of size rumors.
Not everyone is identical, man. Some guys here are living im a fantasyland where big dick is the king of the world, but it's just as pathetic to pretend that nobody cares at all. Many do.
That's large, hard; enormous, soft. Superior, then.
I'm micro, soft; tiny, hard. Ipso facto, inferior. But my looks and confidence mean I've probably laid more women in a week than most guys in a lifetime. I'm results-oriented, so superior in that respect. However, I've been in enough MFM 3-ways to know that's not the whole measure of a man.
Women talking about "huge cocks" or sharing pictures of "big ones" is a male myth widely believed by members of this site and males lacking in sexual experience with women. An exception to this myth does not make the rule. Your contention that "not everyone is identical" is superfluous to my point -- man.
Sharing pictures that they received is pretty common, in my experience. Maybe it's a generational thing. I don't know your age, but I'm a Millennial. And in college, surrounded by Millennial women and having mostly female friends and ~20 sexual partners (many of whom I loved to talk about dick size with), I was brought in the loop on quite a few stories of sharing. And I saw first hand as a few different girls, from entirely different friend groups with varying sexual experience, shared dick pics on their phones with other girls. A couple times in a "wow, I can't believe he sent one," way, but other times in a "look at this thing, it's huge" kind of way. My own pictures were shared by probably at least a dozen girls. It felt more common than not, but I don't think I can truly say that it was. It's probably more common not to share. But dude, you say it's a myth - that's sadly misinformed.
Now, actually inviting those girls to try it or something was rare. I only remember one girl who was especially excited by my size who invited two of her close friends to have threesomes with us. Both of them expressed interest, but both backed out because they thought me and their friend would end uo dating and it would be awkward. We never did - it was purely friends with benefits - but the offer was made. By the girl, not me, and mostly due to size (but also because I generally satisfied her, was nice to her, routinely went down on her...but it started because she showed them my dick pics)
Brings to mind Winston Churchill's quip about ending sentences with a preposition, "This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
And Churchill wasn't any slouch when it came to the English language. He won a Nobel Prize in Literature, for chrissakes! How many accomplished that in the U.S. state in which you were "educated taught English"? I'd guess, not you. Or did I miss that?Also reminds me of an experience W. Somerset Maugham had (also no slouch with words). He was staying at a hotel and had conversation with an English teacher. He offered to let her review something he was working on for comments and suggestions. He received it back with a slew of grammatical corrections. They were of no use to him. Maugham knew his grammar but was concerned in the flow of sentences and the rhythms of normal speech, not in punctilious punctuation or what Churchill referred to as "arrant pedantry".
Something else to consider: I try to choose my words carefully but often, later on, looking back, cringe over some solecism or misspelling of mine ("Damn spell check!").
Men will forever hope women are impressed with their dicks. Men will forever be disappointed that women are impressed by their character. My suggestion is that you keep hanging on to the belief that women want your dick-pics so that those same women can focus on selecting other men working hard to make something of themselves.
Yes, Churchill's tortured syntax was a thing of rhetorical beauty. And Maugham was a great writer. But you, sir, are no Churchill or Maugham so I suggest we both do our best to stick to properly written English so that we do not undermine our own communications. But you did cast the first stone so it is incumbent upon you to own it and not be defensive.Brings to mind Winston Churchill's quip about ending sentences with a preposition, "This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
Also reminds me of an experience W. Somerset Maugham had (also no slouch with words). He was staying at a hotel and had conversation with an English teacher. He offered to let her review something he was working on for comments and suggestions. He received it back with a slew of grammatical corrections. They were of no use to him. Maugham knew his grammar but was concerned in the flow of sentence and the rhythms of normal speech, not in punctilious punctuation or what Churchill referred to as "arrant pedantry".
Something else to consider: I try to choose my words carefully but often, later on, looking back, cringe over some solecism or misspelling of mine ("Damn spell check!").I've also found that challenging someone's grammar or orthography is usually an admission of weak arguments.![:omgsmilie:]( ":omgsmilie:")
I never claimed to be. I'm simply a hunk with a tiny todger. And, to paraphrase Senator Lloyd Benson's famous jibe to Senator Dan Quayle, I'm no John Kennedy, either. (Kennedy was no slouch with words, either.) I try my best and often fail. Or to paraphrase you, always fail. C'est la vie! I don't lose any sleep over it. I suggest you don't, either. There are countless others to pillory and demean.
Certainly not mutually exclusive -- just a big miss between the two genders.
Truly said..."countless others to pillory and demean." But do they have to make it so easy?!
Be gone oddball. You haven’t “ hurt” s t icy with you goody readings of shit which was clearly your intention.,
