Courtland75
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2022
- Posts
- 552
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,186
- Points
- 138
- Location
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Sexuality
- No Response
Youtubers Daniel Buyeske and Bonde Johson
- Thread starter silvin
- Start date
That's interesting. Bonde would have pinged my gaydar w/o his interactions with Dan tbh. In any case, straight or gay, he seems like a douche. I felt bad at first about possibly outing someone and speculating but no one agrees with me (which is chill lol) and his politics are bad enough that I wouldn't feel bad anyway. I never looked into what channels he followed, but I remember him making an out-of-place joke about pronouns in a video and thinking it was weird at the time. I wonder if Dan & Co. will get cancelled if the channel continues to grow. Youtubers have been cancelled for much less before, especially when they have a female-heavy audience.
Enough with the politics, already. Jeez. So other people have different opinions and beliefs. Cancel them because of that? Calm down and just enjoy Bonde's pasty muscular often sweaty body.
I mean, Bonde's pasty body is why I still watch lol. For me, it's not so much that I WANT them "canceled", I just won't be all that upset if they are.
I tend to agree that a person's "opinions" shouldn't be ignored if their opinions are the kind that actively tries to harm others, but I also don't think knowing who someone follows or a few stray comments is enough to fully understand their politics and whether or not they should be canceled. Maybe I'd cancel him for following someone as deeply unfunny and lame as Crowder, though (...speaking of people who might be in the closet).
But I also get that this is the internet, so I'm really just here for the show. Dan's case is interesting to me because I get the feeling some of his audience would agree with his friend's politics, a majority wouldn't care, but a sizable number would be deeply offended, especially as his audience expands.
I tend to agree that a person's "opinions" shouldn't be ignored if their opinions are the kind that actively tries to harm others, but I also don't think knowing who someone follows or a few stray comments is enough to fully understand their politics and whether or not they should be canceled. Maybe I'd cancel him for following someone as deeply unfunny and lame as Crowder, though (...speaking of people who might be in the closet).
But I also get that this is the internet, so I'm really just here for the show. Dan's case is interesting to me because I get the feeling some of his audience would agree with his friend's politics, a majority wouldn't care, but a sizable number would be deeply offended, especially as his audience expands.
ColonialBoy
Expert Member
They look like "gay-acting for clicks".
At any rate they would be far better off doing regular athletics. What they are doing leads nowhere.
At any rate they would be far better off doing regular athletics. What they are doing leads nowhere.
Agree
That ass reminds me of the video where the girl is in high heels and Bonde pops his ass up in a joke about anal.
Thought you all might be curious to hear this old podcast episode where a clinically depressed Daniel Buyeske argues with his "roommate":
Cheerleading Podcast - Brand New Day
The guy Dan is talking to is @craigtakespictures on instagram.
Cheerleading Podcast - Brand New Day
The guy Dan is talking to is @craigtakespictures on instagram.
I'm not sitting through an hour of this, just tell us the TLDR or timestamps.
5:00-11:00 for Dan revealing to his audience he shares a bed with his roommate.
29:00-30:00 for Dan and his roommate initiating a fight about how the other always attacks their insecurities. (The two of them having communication issues is basically 90% of the recording, but I'll give this as an example because the way they fight is not just two bros fighting imo.)
My takeaway was that Dan clearly had a gay relationship with his cohost and was revealing it to his small podcast audience (along with how dysfunctional it was, I guess?), but he doesn't actually say it directly, so other people might interpret it differently. Also, for a bit of context, he ended the podcast in the next episode by mentioning how his mom told him not to talk about his personal life lol
one thing's for sure -- he and Bonde have way better chemistry. that shit was just awkward to listen to
Thanks for delivering, mawma
His short shorts are everything to me
Similar threads
