Well, Adam never started the whole thing as a sex worker. He never was a cam model on CB or wherever, you know. He calls what he does Art and not Sex. That's why he never really does full frontals or anything.
I wish@ ladyjakubowsky was as sexual as Mastercum
 
I would just like to take this moment to say, thank you for everyone's efforts! This is possibly the best thread on here at the moment and I'm so glad he's a hidden gem! Now on to more pressing matters...

tenor.gif

tenor.gif
 
We received a DMCA notice please do not post his content again thanks.
To be clear: no content of him at all, or no premium content thats behind a paywall. He posts a lot of free stuff of Twitter for example, that's just public content anyway. right?

If nothing us allowed we might as well close this thread. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: bisex4fun
To be clear: no content of him at all, or no premium content thats behind a paywall. He posts a lot of free stuff of Twitter for example, that's just public content anyway. right?

If nothing us allowed we might as well close this thread. :)

Perhaps this will help: whether he posts it behind a paywall or on twitter, it's still copyright protected and it's his choice where to allow it to be viewed or posted. He may not care about material on his twitter feed being posted elsewhere. Or he may want it only posted there in order to maximize views/hits to his twitter. Ultimately, it's his choice.
 
Perhaps this will help: whether he posts it behind a paywall or on twitter, it's still copyright protected and it's his choice where to allow it to be viewed or posted. He may not care about material on his twitter feed being posted elsewhere. Or he may want it only posted there in order to maximize views/hits to his twitter. Ultimately, it's his choice.
How about for things that are published in a public forum, just post a link to the external post? That way the copyrighted content isn't being republished in any way, it is only being pointed to. We would still be able to see it by following the link, but none of the actual content would be here.
Would that be an acceptable compromise on something like this?
 
How about for things that are published in a public forum, just post a link to the external post? That way the copyrighted content isn't being republished in any way, it is only being pointed to. We would still be able to see it by following the link, but none of the actual content would be here.
Would that be an acceptable compromise on something like this?

I think tarheel was just giving advice as a long time member, he is not marked as a moderator so has no decision making power.
 
How about for things that are published in a public forum, just post a link to the external post? That way the copyrighted content isn't being republished in any way, it is only being pointed to. We would still be able to see it by following the link, but none of the actual content would be here.
Would that be an acceptable compromise on something like this?

If all the link does is connects the clicker to a site operated by the copyright owner, that's probably right. Linking to other sites with pirated material probably still violates copyright. But even then, it's less clear a violation than posting the content itself on this site -- that's clearly making an unauthorized "copy" in terms of copyright law.