I’m gay and a President Trump supporter. It’s very easy because I care about much more than gay rights.
Curtis From Sean Cody Is Trans?
- Thread starter ihavenoidea
- Start date
This thread is a train wreck...
Hmm, I have not read the whole thread; only the first pge and I think he is not transgender. Trangender people suffer from gender dysphoria where they state they feel like the other sex and feeluncomfortable with ther biological sex.
To me his case looks like transvestism or autogynephilia (although this condition has to yet be proven as real).
To me his case looks like transvestism or autogynephilia (although this condition has to yet be proven as real).
Yup, like all threads with cute White boys that step out of the heteronormative box.
At least we don't have to suffer through endless pages of members begging for nudes.
When your racism outweighs your self preservation. Congrats.
IOW, you get your tax cuts and the racist, sexist, classist policies and lies enacted by the bigoted orange dumpster fire that leads your party, and the party officials that let him get away with anything are just the price you're willing to pay, and the rest of the world can get fucked, right?
Skyfallen
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
- Posts
- 204
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,927
- Points
- 313
- Location
- Savannah (Georgia, United States)
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
was here to wank but it was all politics. i went soft :\
we’ve finally found the worst thread on LPSG.
Also, has anyone considered that the Grindr pic is not even Curtis. Or that the pic is Curtis but being used as a catfish and he dressed up for something as simple as Halloween 6 days ago.
Also, has anyone considered that the Grindr pic is not even Curtis. Or that the pic is Curtis but being used as a catfish and he dressed up for something as simple as Halloween 6 days ago.
billybones
Superior Member
I dunno. Did you see the naked, elderly violinist thread?
I saw that comment and then found that thread. That man is disgusting
Listen up little buddy, calling out racists is not “reverse racism” or some other stupid term folks like you come up with. Racism is system of oppression by people in power, as such people of color cannot be racist. It’s hevaily evident that you think someone calling you out for your outdated and bluntly ignorant beliefs is “racist,” when in reality it just shows how backwards and ignorant you are. Go ahead supporting the party of homophobia and xenophobia, given enough time they’ll come for you next.
Racist and a stupid. You hit the jackpot.
Just because he says he supports gays and blacks, it doesn't mean squat when you look at the policies he supports and champions. The preachers he shares a atage with. The white supremacists he lauds and defends and employs.
But sure. Delude yourself and keep displaying the garbage fire you have in place of a soul. It's entertaining.
#factcheck
Though I generally agree with the practical points that you made in your argument (the last one I would say is quite a credible assertion, though currently unfounded), I will point out one blatant inaccuracy.
Specifically I take issue with your statement that "Racism is system of oppression by people in power, as such people of color cannot be racist", this is untrue. I would agree that the more insidious forms of racism are backed by larger oppressive systems, that allow the people who wield that power to disenfranchise their victims. However, this is not a requirement of racism, as in its purest form, it only really requires a prejudice against, contempt for, or discrimination against someone on the basis of their race.
As to the point you are trying to make, I would argue that for the reason eluded to above, it is possible for minority groups to commit acts of racism against one another, as opposed to the position your opinion put forward, whereby they would lack the necessary power to commit acts of racism against each other. We know this to not be the case. Also, this is the reason we can identify internalised racism, usually in forms of 'lateral violence', whereby individuals from the same racial group will hold prejudicial, contemptuous or discriminatory views of other individuals within their racial group for a litany or race based issues (eg. racial purity or individuals 'acting white' in POC communities).
Also the reason I reframed your question to align it with the argument of racism and minority groups, and their ability to commit racism, and not 'People of Colour (POC)' as your put it, is because without doing so, a more logical position against your point is that POC are no always in the minority, and therefor your argument wouldn't even make sense prima facie.
Similar threads
