Dean Withers / itsdeaann

That's too much ethics for X and LPSG, someone needs to hate something otherwise the system won't work.
I know what you are getting at, and I agree, but Eagle is a known trump supporter. He doesn't care about the actual argument. He sees this all as a gotcha because his brain has no ridges. Context and nuance do not compute in his brain or the brains of people like him. They see everything as black and white.
 
I know what you are getting at, and I agree, but Eagle is a known trump supporter. He doesn't care about the actual argument. He sees this all as a gotcha because his brain has no ridges. Context and nuance do not compute in his brain or the brains of people like him. They see everything as black and white.
He's a Trumptard? Everything makes sense now.
 
He’s really cute, but the only reason he’s a good at debating is because he can talk fast while saying cognizant things. Like, that’s definitely a really good skill, don’t get me wrong…And I don’t disagree with him on most things…

But I recognized that his talent is speaking, because my libertarian and Republican Uncle has the exact same talent, they just have opposite beliefs. They’re both wrong as much as they’re right, but they’re really good at talking fast and thinking on their feet. If I alternated between listening to the two of them, my mind would get whiplash.

It’s entertaining and captivating. But it doesn’t mean they’re “correct”, or “right”.

It’s honestly really fascinating and a bit mind blowing when you’ve witnessed two people who view things almost polar opposite… but who are both extremely talented at speaking, and you go into it with an open mind. It’s truly like mental whiplash.
 
He’s really cute, but the only reason he’s a good at debating is because he can talk fast while saying cognizant things. Like, that’s definitely a really good skill, don’t get me wrong…And I don’t disagree with him on most things…

But I recognized that his talent is speaking, because my libertarian and Republican Uncle has the exact same talent, they just have opposite beliefs. They’re both wrong as much as they’re right, but they’re really good at talking fast and thinking on their feet. If I alternated between listening to the two of them, my mind would get whiplash.

It’s entertaining and captivating. But it doesn’t mean they’re “correct”, or “right”.

It’s honestly really fascinating and a bit mind blowing when you’ve witnessed two people who view things almost polar opposite… but who are both extremely talented at speaking, and you go into it with an open mind. It’s truly like mental whiplash.
I know politicians like that, extremely talented at quick speaking and debating, but wrong on virtually every issue, be it economical or social.

But many of them went through excessive training, Dean is pretty young so that's kind of impressive.

It'd be funny if he faced off vs. Ben Shapiro, they could rap battle.
 
He’s really cute, but the only reason he’s a good at debating is because he can talk fast while saying cognizant things. Like, that’s definitely a really good skill, don’t get me wrong…And I don’t disagree with him on most things…

But I recognized that his talent is speaking, because my libertarian and Republican Uncle has the exact same talent, they just have opposite beliefs. They’re both wrong as much as they’re right, but they’re really good at talking fast and thinking on their feet. If I alternated between listening to the two of them, my mind would get whiplash.

It’s entertaining and captivating. But it doesn’t mean they’re “correct”, or “right”.

It’s honestly really fascinating and a bit mind blowing when you’ve witnessed two people who view things almost polar opposite… but who are both extremely talented at speaking, and you go into it with an open mind. It’s truly like mental whiplash.
Talking fast doesn't make someone good or bad in debates. How you express your point is what determines how good you are. It can be an asset or liability but mostly the former.