I'm Undergoing Adult Circumcision For Religious Reasons In Possibly A Year Or Two, I Have A Dilemma

I have a very, very long and complicated, deep history with circumcision. I had never been squeamish about it, although I can’t bear to watch anything with blood in it (always been strongly adverse to blood), and actually did it myself. From the moment I read as a teenager that Abraham circumcised himself, it was immovably lodged in my head I could, should, and will do it myself. It became somewhat inevitable.

I also have a very complicated history with homosexuality, and a very complicated history with Judaism. The latter was severely affected by the former and vice versa. I don’t know where the idea of circumcision came from, I just knew like I just knew I was gay and just knew what my religion is. It’s not for here why and how each of things came to be personally acknowledged and worked out where they fit in my life, but it’s all and always a complicated journey for everyone.

It took me a long time to get around to each of those things, acknowledging them was the first issue, and my appointment with the Beit Din is looming close.

Clearly I don’t need to get circumcised again, I did a pretty thorough job first time around, although in all honesty despite all I’ve just said I actually would. The more you go through the Jprep process the more you’ll come to understand why circumcision is important. I was lucky as it was never an issue, and actually despite my circumcision history it really isn’t something I think about when in a Jewish environment.

You said you’re in Birmingham, I guess you’re not converting to Reform as there’s no Reform shul there. In Reform, which I am, there is an obligation for b’rit milah (although I know of two uncut Jews who are friends, it’s kept hush though generally) but if already cut you can either get a doctor’s note or do the hafatat dam b’rit process which is what I opted for without question. I’m Reform in ideology and conservative in practice.

if you’re converting to Orthodox, then that’s already a huge effort to do it as the process is long and involved and that’s just to start. If you chose Orthodox, then I wouldn’t have thought that circumcision would have been the greatest stumbling block as there’s far bigger things ideologically to get around and other practices which are less appealing - well from my perspective anyway.

if you’re doing Masorti, then like Orthodox it’s a non negotiable and it’ll just have to happen. In both cases it waits fairly late, I know a guy converting to Orthodox Judaism and he is in year 5 of 7, he’s not getting circumcised for at least 18-24 months yet, it comes at the end when you get your Hebrew name.

if Liberal, and you’re at the start of the process, you’ll learn more as you go along but circumcision is not required, as the Liberal view of halachah is very different (ie, don’t really follow it). So you could decide later on you don’t want to do it, or one day decide you do. I know several uncuts Liberals.

The labels Reform and Conservative mean very different things in the UK to the US, they’re part of the same “progressive family” of Judaism but Reform in the US (and in Israel) is much closer to that of Liberal in Britain. Reform in the UK has it’s roots in the argument between Bevis Marks and my synagogue West London.

Anyway, back to the topic and this is LPSG , you may find as you progress your understanding of what circumcision means changes both through study, the community and going through several Torah cycles. The whole Torah tells you why each of the mitzvot individually are important, if you’re converting for your own sake and for religious reasons rather than cultural, then understanding of the value of the convenant (especially in a non- Liberal perspective) will come to mean a lot more than you initially think. The covenant is a two way deal with God, totally non negotiable on either side, if you want to be a member of the tribe then you have to accept the Covenant. Sorry if that sounds hard, but that’s clearly what the score is from the outset. A degree of anxiety about circumcision is perhaps normal - I’m sorry, I’ve just never experienced it personally but that’s just due to my own circumstances, which I think is tied into the whole Jewish thing from the start - but the reason for it comes to override everything else.

A lot changes in the course of a couple of years and you can’t predict now what you’ll think then. As b’rit milah doesn’t happen until right toward the end, and you may find that your awareness and mindset changes before then.

I know you said you’re fine with what circumcision is but worried about standing out. That’s the point I’ve been making... as a Jew, even a progressive one, you’re going to stand out because living a Jewish life isn’t the same as a secular one. I observe Shabbat, there’s a mezuzah on my door, I keep kosher so I don’t eat certain things with even my Jewish friends and am choosy in what I drink. Being Jewish means you’ll have to get used to standing out, both with gentiles and other Jews in the community who have different practices, levels of observance and history. Standing out, like the Covenant, is also part of what you sign up for.

Hope that helps a bit, happy to take the conversation into more depth and more specific in a more private environment like pm, text, email or phone.

L’shalom

Very interesting!
 
I went to a Korean spa the other day and there was this jewish man there with the most beautiful low and tight circumcision. Which ever doctor performed the surgery did an amazing job. Aside from him and I, everyone was uncut - but nobody cared that i could tell. I say go for it! :)
 
There is no evidence at all this is the case. Post-circumcision patients do not describe any loss of pleasure. The foreskin is not some sexual talisman that makes pleasure without it impossible. If so much was lost you would think you'd have some substantial set of patients willing to step forward screaming don't do it.
This is not true. Not all post-circ men report a loss in pleasure, but many do, and many of those report a significant loss.
 
It’s amazing when looking at the difference between cut and uncut that your eyes can not tell you what should be obvious yet still people debate this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maryland36
This is not true. Not all post-circ men report a loss in pleasure, but many do, and many of those report a significant loss.
Not to mention people who have restored and report the gains, not what you have what you are born with, but restoring the sheath makes a big difference. Not to mention, it’s not all about the sensitivity. The way it works and the way it is used is entirely different. I never expected it to feel like it does to have a sheath, before I experienced it I couldn’t understand or put it in to words. I still
Can’t describe it but I know how it feels and works.
 
Show me yours.

Men reporting their experience is anecdotal. If you look up the Sorrells study from 2007, the data shows some of the most highly sensitive parts of the penis are amputated in circumcision.

Ahh the infamous Sorrells, the first anti-circ crusader, whose sole study is used everywhere by the anti-circ squad. So we can dispense with his study. It needs to be duplicated and then accepted by others in his field.

As for risks well nothing is mentioned here regarding devastating sexual consequences.
Adult Circumcision: Procedure, Care, Recovery, Results, and More
Psychological and sexual effects of circumcision in adult males
 
No, you don't get to simply dismiss a study because you don't like what it found. Sorry. It was peer reviewed and published in a reputable research journal.

What we can dismiss are the studies pro-circers like to use, which only tested the head of the penis. Tell me, how do you test the sensitivity of a circumcised man's foreskin? Since they only tested the head, these studies are useless in actually determining if circumcised men experience less sensation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fitsstop
For my first semi cut, I ensured I kept all my frenulum. 15 years later, after my foreksin basically restored (from masturbation and being placed in underwear to prevent it from retracting), I got another snip (still semi cut). But it ended up tight enough duiring erection that I noticed the frenulum was pulling down glans.

Despite having been opposed to losing the frenulum, when I noticed it, the decision to partially snip it was a no brainer. Below are the before/after. Basically detached the frenulum from glans. I did it when hard and still remember the "release" when I snipped it, feeling the glans go up and skin go down.

What I noticed: when jerking off (still did it as uncut with skin up/down). on the downstroke, the frenulum no longer tugged down on glans. BUT, the coronna on the venttal side became much more prominent and could be stimulated more directly since not hidden by frenulum.

After I became fully cut, the remaining frenulum became mroe of a lump which was unslightly, so =gain, no brainer to lose what was left of it.

Note: in hindsight, it is possible that if I had been patient after the 1995 snip, perhaps the frenumum would have stretched and no longer pulled glans down. It didn't cause problem or tear, it just was purely cosmetic issue.
frenulum_snip1.jpg
frenulum_snip2.jpg
 

Attachments

I find it absolutely absurd that a man's "god given" skin should be knifed by man to comply with man's twisted interpretations on god's wish list. The small and big things all wrong that man has done through the ages in "god's name".
Circumcision is part of Judaism (and Islam). Let's leave it to Jewish people to explain their perspectives on their religion. Some are questioning circumcision themselves. And let's leave our religion out of this. I don't think it's fair to call other people's religion's "absolutely absurd" just because it is different from ours, even if this particular practice is backward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarletbegonia
Circumcision is part of Judaism (and Islam). Let's leave it to Jewish people to explain their perspectives on their religion. Some are questioning circumcision themselves. And let's leave our religion out of this. I don't think it's fair to call other people's religion's "absolutely absurd" just because it is different from ours, even if this particular practice is backward.

I am not calling anyone's RELIGION absolutely absurd, I am calling man's action to interpret their religious beliefs absolutely absurd. I see no actual difference between the circumcision of men anywhere and the circumcision of women in Africa that can only be viewed as violent and dangerous physical acts against a person, against her will.
 
As the above explains, I am getting circumcised next year (2020) or the year after that for religious reasons as part of becoming a Jew.

I'm totally cool with it (never used to be), however, I don't know how to explain this in a few words but I think my main fear is standing out too much. Of course, one should be proud of who they are (or who they will be), however, I feel like being circumcised will make me stand out too much especially when in the UK the majority of men aren't circumcised.

If anyone can give me some reassuring words or just generally talk about what it is liked to be a circumcised guy in the UK I'd appreciate it.
You will be fine, I wouldn’t pay too much attention to the horror stories. You won’t stand out, I thought that I would, it was all my own insecurities
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted15807
Irrespective of what "religion" really is, circumcision is just part of social customs hat are integrated into a society and/or religion. It gives you a sense of belonging and fitting in.

If you are in a group where the expectation is that you are circumcised, then you get circumcised because it is integral part of being part of that group.

In the USA for instance, in the 50s and 60s, the "all american boy" sported a bare glans and a circumcision line, with outline of bare glans visible in the white briefs. Society expected boys to look like that. Not "religion" but still a very strong social expectation that continues (to a lesser entent) today.

In areas where there is mixture of cut and uncut, it becomes somewhat tribal or "competing sports team". you're either part of team hooded or team helmet. You support your own team. And when you join team helmet, you become proud to be circumcised and feel no need to hide it from those in the other team. And if you in a minority, there is a bit of secret kinship between members of the team helmet. (similarly, where uncuts are minority, there is kinship betwene them).


When youLre proud of how your penis looks, you have no problem with others who are different in locker room seeing your unit.
 
How is it not comparable? It depends on the local custom. Some cultures just remove the tip of the foreskin and some just make a nick in the clitoral hood. Some remove the foreskin to behind the glans and some remove the [art pf tje clitoral hood. Some cultures remove more of the foreskin so as there is none left. The same with the clitoral hood. Some cultures remove ALL the skin of the penis up to the belly! Some remove the entire clitoris and sow the vulva up and just leave a pee hole. Some split the urethra of the penis so the man has to pee sitting. Genital mutilation is genital mutilation. Often the culture circumcises its child and then throws the wrong part away.