That’s why you don’t create an onlyfans the day you turn 18 & when you know nothing about it. He’s just a stupid child & even his spelling is fucked up. Too bad he still made a shit ton of money from it.
Isaac Rossiter
- Thread starter Iloveboys1234
- Start date
Not popping off. I just think it’s ridiculous how he says he never promised nudity (which btw is true) full on knowing what site he signed up for. He has friends in his immediate circle that are on onlyfans and he acts like he didn’t know what he was getting into when he full on did.
Facts are facts, all he did is scam people and he will get away with it either way because he’s got thousands of people simping for him and plays it off like he’s the victim when he took thousands of peoples money.
Facts are facts, all he did is scam people and he will get away with it either way because he’s got thousands of people simping for him and plays it off like he’s the victim when he took thousands of peoples money.
I wonder if anyone told him hes going to have to file taxes for all that money he raked in.
Catch me, like this is a legal proceeding determining his offences. Your case must hold up. By legal definition, after seeing his dick, has he scammed?
OF isn't technically a porn site. Any content creator on the platform can post whatever they want and if the pics leaked and screengrabbed here is any indication he intended to go that route anyway.
And stop saying victims, at best its people that were likely lusting after someone they wouldn't be able to admit to earlier this week cause it'd be a felony.
Like it seems like a lot of it stems from 1 picture where he mentions if you want to see him drop a towel but doesn't. He never said he would. Other people are not responsible for the collective lack of reading comprehension displayed by people so thirsty they readily payed money for a single image. Which in and of itself is completely baffling.
Glad you like it. It's actually mine. Not sure how he got that picture...
Well spoken and good perspective. I would say the context of the dropping of the towel bit was playful, in spite of himself and the nature of expectation, and a play on words. On balance, it sounds regardless of it, the other content has shown nudity, ie his dick. Which would therefore make the thinly vailed reason to as why people would subscribed ‘fulfilled’. He is not obligated contractually under the terms and conditions to expose himself. While the towel debacle may have shown light to how things maybe interpreted by a reader, he still showed his dick, some thing he could have chosen not to do. Where this a court of law, people got what they paid for, they threw a sum of money for anything. He could have shown you a pencil on a table and by definition he would have fulfilled the transaction as Onlyfans does not need to be regarded in black and white contractual form as a site strictly for the sale of pornography content. Furthermore a judge would be very tongue in cheek, pursed lips if he has to preside over what appears to be a boy with a birthday hat on in a towel on one side and on the other side a bunch of men older then him feeling cheated the boy did not cut the cake with his dick. The words entitlement, legal precedents come to mind. By nature, Onlyfans is like a mystery box you an individual chose to pay for. Nobody forces you to, and in court will you argue in front of your family and friends that you were forced to buy content on Onlyfans. On balance, did he drag it out and entire 1-5 years before showing his dick? Or did he practically come right out of the gates with it? Now, as for the moral, ethical, grandstanding, there’s not a lot of solid ground for what is by demographic and older male to sue this boy for the purchase of his online “mystery boy” and its contents. You don’t appear very noble or non-objectifying scolding what in the general non porn purchasing public a young boy about the non implicit, implied, non contractually obligations that don’t appear in a legally binding contract signed between you the purchaser and he the seller. I know the cynic nature of the internet, human micro aggressions, passive aggressive behaviour, entitlement and sexual objectification, and may I say, sexual frustration enforce. Buuut... had a community of curious or nefarious people wanted to see more to follow and further transactions, they certainly messed the shop floor up days after opening by trudging in dirt rather than establishing a good rapport. I think I would rather bolt and react poorly after that ‘grand opening’ reception. In what is called playing devil’s advocate, had you wanted to see further content, “you” (who ever it pertains to) certainly cocked it up. A term here meaning lessened the success of such action. We can taut common decency and argue morality and ethics with great hypocrisy, but was the goal to be a captive audience for an impromptu show, some people certainly pummelled the act before it’s 1st year on tour. I judge might have a few choice words or little sympathy towards the offended in question. He might turn it around and argue people look towards you to reflect and demonstrate what would be a good community and to be better ambassadors. While it is easy to kick the shit out of anybody online, as humans, people look to you to reflect what is noble or good standing in themselves. I wonder if he’s been able to talk to his mother about this issue. Obviously it isn’t something you would wish to raise with your parent, but after putting yourself out there and regardless of it and taking the nature of it with a grain of salt and humour, getting such a lashing, one might want to debrief and talk about it. One must step back and self assess within the shades of grey if they were entirely innocent and a good sport through and through or made someone’s coming of age a less than desirable experience.
Two things are true:
- Subscribers are wrong in acting like he has an obligation to show dick just because he's on OnlyFans. We took a risk signing up sight unseen and he didn't make promises;
- his initial towel scam, while unlikely to hold up in court as a crime, is a crappy way to do business and evaporated all good will.
This is a fun way to sic the authorities at him without the courts (which are unlikely to succeed anyways). If someone is vindictive enough to report him to the Canadian equivalent of the IRS when the time comes?
Wait he stole your picture,and sold it as transaction for equal value? Can he actually do that
Nah the penis is Isaac's. Check Instagram for the same watch he wears and according to an unspeakable source the dick length/girth/cut checks out.
Finally the real game begins... XD he's going to screwed if lies about how he got the money,there's no way around this topic cause there's too simps out there with the ability to screenshot..
Entitlement and toxic are completely overused these days anyway. People have a right to be angry and feel how they feel if they are scammed which they have been. Its not entitlement when your scammed either. True he doesn't owe anyone anything but if you go onto a sight, have people repeatedly pay money hinting at a product your not getting its a scam, let's call an orange an orange.
And to add to my point above its not even that great of a dick. Its average. and his body is slightly above average. And clearly his personality is below average. Lets be real way better people to lust over and give money too...
Similar threads
