Isaac Rossiter

Well spoken and good perspective. I would say the context of the dropping of the towel bit was playful, in spite of himself and the nature of expectation, and a play on words. On balance, it sounds regardless of it, the other content has shown nudity, ie his dick. Which would therefore make the thinly vailed reason to as why people would subscribed ‘fulfilled’. He is not obligated contractually under the terms and conditions to expose himself. While the towel debacle may have shown light to how things maybe interpreted by a reader, he still showed his dick, some thing he could have chosen not to do. Where this a court of law, people got what they paid for, they threw a sum of money for anything. He could have shown you a pencil on a table and by definition he would have fulfilled the transaction as Onlyfans does not need to be regarded in black and white contractual form as a site strictly for the sale of pornography content. Furthermore a judge would be very tongue in cheek, pursed lips if he has to preside over what appears to be a boy with a birthday hat on in a towel on one side and on the other side a bunch of men older then him feeling cheated the boy did not cut the cake with his dick. The words entitlement, legal precedents come to mind. By nature, Onlyfans is like a mystery box you an individual chose to pay for. Nobody forces you to, and in court will you argue in front of your family and friends that you were forced to buy content on Onlyfans. On balance, did he drag it out and entire 1-5 years before showing his dick? Or did he practically come right out of the gates with it? Now, as for the moral, ethical, grandstanding, there’s not a lot of solid ground for what is by demographic and older male to sue this boy for the purchase of his online “mystery boy” and its contents. You don’t appear very noble or non-objectifying scolding what in the general non porn purchasing public a young boy about the non implicit, implied, non contractually obligations that don’t appear in a legally binding contract signed between you the purchaser and he the seller. I know the cynic nature of the internet, human micro aggressions, passive aggressive behaviour, entitlement and sexual objectification, and may I say, sexual frustration enforce. Buuut... had a community of curious or nefarious people wanted to see more to follow and further transactions, they certainly messed the shop floor up days after opening by trudging in dirt rather than establishing a good rapport. I think I would rather bolt and react poorly after that ‘grand opening’ reception. In what is called playing devil’s advocate, had you wanted to see further content, “you” (who ever it pertains to) certainly cocked it up. A term here meaning lessened the success of such action. We can taut common decency and argue morality and ethics with great hypocrisy, but was the goal to be a captive audience for an impromptu show, some people certainly pummelled the act before it’s 1st year on tour. I judge might have a few choice words or little sympathy towards the offended in question. He might turn it around and argue people look towards you to reflect and demonstrate what would be a good community and to be better ambassadors. While it is easy to kick the shit out of anybody online, as humans, people look to you to reflect what is noble or good standing in themselves. I wonder if he’s been able to talk to his mother about this issue. Obviously it isn’t something you would wish to raise with your parent, but after putting yourself out there and regardless of it and taking the nature of it with a grain of salt and humour, getting such a lashing, one might want to debrief and talk about it. One must step back and self assess within the shades of grey if they were entirely innocent and a good sport through and through or made someone’s coming of age a less than desirable experience.

If you broke this down into paragraphs I would read it...
 
and then he turns 18 and doesn't expose himself as graphically as you'd like.

That's not what set this train in motion, though. It's the fact that his very first post turned out to be a scam, people gave him feedback on that, and he blew up his OnlyFans in response.

at best its people that were likely lusting after someone they wouldn't be able to admit to earlier this week cause it'd be a felony.

I like how you think this is some kind of gotcha when 99% of them probably have zero problems admitting they liked Isaac earlier this week, too. And last week and the week before. Isaac's been handsome for a while now and I have yet to see people claiming he wasn't until this week. What helps is that that's not nearly a felony as you rather colourfully claimed.

But the point is moot anyway, because the scamming did not occur earlier in the week, it occurred now. 18-year-olds can be naive, yes, but ill intent is still ill intent. Your defense of him is admirable but talking about felonies and lusting after children is overdoing it a bit, methinks?
 
Really I want to plug Malik again for being a 19 years young muscle god with great work ethics, is down to earth and takes feedback kindly. I'm sorry if people are offended but I just feels like it's so unfair Isaac got such a big following than him (I have no personal relations with either of them).
OnlyFans
View attachment 27873431
Why are you put this guy here? OMG unnecessary and the p.d. i not have personal relations with them are u Malik or what???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leo99999
That's not what set this train in motion, though. It's the fact that his very first post turned out to be a scam, people gave him feedback on that, and he blew up his OnlyFans in response.
But it wasn't a scam, people bought an item blind and were disappointed, its not his job to manage peoples expectations and assumptions. If I post a link asking if you want a million dollars and don't give it to you there is no scam. I never said that I would. Its the same situation, don't pay for things unless you know what it is.
And I don't think its overboard at all. What is overboard is reporting someones social media handle because you feel entitled to see some 18 year olds dick.
 
But it wasn't a scam, people bought an item blind and were disappointed, its not his job to manage peoples expectations and assumptions.
Yeah, not buying it. He knew what he was doing when he advertised dropping the towel for a hefty additional fee, and then just sending people the exact same picture after payment. Refusing to call this scamming is mental gymnastics.

What is overboard is reporting someones social media handle because you feel entitled to see some 18 year olds dick.
I agree that involving Instagram is overkill. But I have no problems with people reporting him on the platform where the scamming occurred.
 
View attachment 27884011

So your argument is when Isaac typed out "Want too see me drop the towel?" he has no intention to mislead anyone into thinking paying $15 would get you a pic where the towel drop?

Even if you and Isaac are both so stupid (which, for the record, I don't think is true because you're just arguing out of bad faith), he has to take feedback that most people are not unreasonable in feeling cheated by his wording, instead of throwing a tantrum like we all are mistreating him.

But really, look at what a mental pretzel you're twisting yourself into just to defend this pretty boy's idiotic actions. You're debasing yourself to the lowest form of white knight gays and really, you're the reason some people deserve to be cheated & scammed.
And again, I don't know why Isaac or these white knights here are still talking about this when we are perfectly willing to move past it. Real nudes already dropped, he did not keep on scamming, and only a stupid 18yo and these parasitic simps here want to keep arguing that they are in fact saints and we're all being so unfair to him, boo hoo
 
Entitlement and toxic are completely overused these days anyway. People have a right to be angry and feel how they feel if they are scammed which they have been. Its not entitlement when your scammed either. True he doesn't owe anyone anything but if you go onto a sight, have people repeatedly pay money hinting at a product your not getting its a scam, let's call an orange an orange.

I like your metaphor on this :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flo179
View attachment 27884011

So your argument is when Isaac typed out "Want too see me drop the towel?" he has no intention to mislead anyone into thinking paying $15 would get you a pic where the towel drop?

Even if you and Isaac are both so stupid (which, for the record, I don't think is true because you're just arguing out of bad faith), he has to take feedback that most people are not unreasonable in feeling cheated by his wording, instead of throwing a tantrum like he's 100% right and the paying subscribers are wrong in their feelings.

But really, look at what a mental pretzel you're twisting yourself into just to defend this pretty boy's idiotic actions. You're debasing yourself to the lowest form of white knight gays and really, you're the reason some people deserve to be cheated & scammed.
There is no pretzel twisting logic at play though. He posted paid content and people bought it. Its a straight line of thought. And apparently no one was smart enough to ask him what the picture was of before they bought it means I'm plenty far from the stupid as opposed to the people wailing like harpies about amateur porn.
 
There is no pretzel twisting logic at play though. He posted paid content and people bought it. Its a straight line of thought. And apparently no one was smart enough to ask him what the picture was of before they bought it means I'm plenty far from the stupid as opposed to the people wailing like harpies about amateur porn.

Let me respond to that by showing you a picture of my cock:

red-rooster-cockerel-standing-one-leg-grass-157246205.jpg
 
There is no pretzel twisting logic at play though. He posted paid content and people bought it. Its a straight line of thought. And apparently no one was smart enough to ask him what the picture was of before they bought it means I'm plenty far from the stupid as opposed to the people wailing like harpies about amateur porn.
But you ignore my point on Isaac clearly had an intention to deceive and you wanna defend that? And even if he is truly so stupid he can at least acknowledge the misunderstanding instead of acting like, you know, he's doing us a favor? If you actually paid and are still defending him to death that's the saddest shit I've seen. It's like a cult member thanking the leader for taking his money. Whatever, the arguments are starting to repeat themselves, adjourned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Venbaby and baby g
Send it to my instagram presto590_ I'm not paying this website anything just to watch a video sorry lol

Umm you can actually watch the video here,just refresh the page about 10-20 times to get past the bot..I'm watching it now
 
  • Like
Reactions: BakerHouse
Why is everyone still arguing about isaac still

It's been proven that's he's just another scammer

In fact even Patrick and breezy haven't done half the things he's done so far

I remember something like this happened in the breezy thread too

For someone like Isaac he needs places like this to give him attention

I think this and all other thread about him need to be locked and he needs to be added to the do not post list

He needs a ban on here just like Instagram have to stop his influence and bullshit spreading already

He's really not worth arguing over like this