Measured porn stars??

[drabman]

I remember first seeing Castro in Bangbros videos and thinking he was absolutely massive. I quickly came to realize that it was really a mixture of a few things that created the illusion:

...
2.) His girth, which makes his total volume look (and actually be) substantially more than most other porn stars in his size range

Castro pumps before scenes. Someone posted a still from a behind the scenes vid showing him in the pump. It may even have been in this thread.

3.) His weird curvature and the fact that when hes hard he still hangs down...This makes it look like he's soft or semi and hanging when he is, in fact, fully hard

I'm not sure he's fully hard. He always seems a little "squishy" to me. Might this be due to pumping?

Shane Diesel has this effect to a more pronounced degree and I'm pretty sure he pumps too. I'm sure I've seen early vids of his where his dick didn't look so spongy and wasn't quite as thick. Someone claiming to work in the industry here once said he pumped. I assume that would explain the odd appearance of his dick.

4.) Hes a certified member of the Lollipop Guild (i.e. not exactly Manute Bol)

I was confused by the Manute Bol reference - I genuinely thought it was a typo of "Minute Boy"! :smile: (You can tell basketball isn't big over here!) You're right though - nearly all the huge cock pornstars are very small, if not virtual midgets.

IMO most exaggerate their height stats - in fact even stars who aren't short do this. I've seen Matt Hughes/Danny Dong/Danny D often listed as 6'. However I find this extremely doubtful, considering how his height measures up by comparison with others when they're shown standing next to him on film. For example, I saw a vid of him interviewed at the Shafta awards while he was standing next to a mixture of male and female talent. He wasn't taller than most of the men and in fact was shorter than quite a few, which you wouldn't expect from someone standing six feet tall. I suspect he's 5'9 or so in reality (and also very slight, which adds to the impression of cock size).

Mandingo is listed on some sites as 5'7", which in itself is well below average height for a man. However I doubt he's even that. Comparing him with the height of his (often tiny) co-stars and objects of fairly standard height in films, he could easily be even an inch or two shorter. Remember that height is a desirable male attribute and consequently yet another thing that porn stars/companies/sites have an incentive to fabricate or exaggerate, apart from the wish to create an illusion of monster cocks. I once saw Mandingo's page on an agency site (Jim South?) which listed him as 6' tall, which is beyond ridiculous.

Boz is a good example of the phenomena of both midget big-cock pornstars and the tendency to add a couple of inches on their height, as well as their cock-sizes. He's listed in IAFD as 5'5".

At the beginning of his scene with Stephanie Richards in "Beauties And The Beast", there is a preamble in which they are standing next to each other in a way that makes it plain to see that Boz is noticeably shorter than her (i.e at least a couple of inches). She's wearing sandals, so there's no issue of heels adding to her height. Stephanie Richards height is listed on various sites as between 5' 4" and 5' 6", although only one site I've seen lists the higher figure - IAFD has her as 5'5".

Clearly Boz is even shorter than 5'5". In some countries this means that he is petite size for a woman. Next time anyone is tempted to estimate his penis, or those of any of the other short big-cock porn stars, at 10"-plus, please bear that in mind.

 

[drabman]

There's a recent vid of Danny D/Danny Dong/Matt Hughes being measured by Tanya Tate. If you see the nonsensical lengths (no pun intended) to which she stoops in order to try and fabricate a measurement of 10", it should be clear to any rational person that he is nowhere near this length in reality.

Given that the gullible and the monster cock fantasists on this site often cite him as proof of the mythical 10" penis, hopefully this might give them food for thought.

I actually have a still, but I'm not sure how to post pics. I have the trailer, but I'm reluctant to post copyrighted vids as there has been a recent case of mass infringement letters sent by Ben Dover in the UK.

 

[drabman]

this is Mark Ashley, 7" on the tape, although it probably cant be an "official" measurement since you cant see where the tape starts.

He isn't a true 7" measured like that. Side measurement usually adds about an inch.

This pic surprises me, because I've seen him being measured by Diamond Kitty. He came out at 8" from the side in that vid, which would make him around 7" NBP on top. I can't work out why this pic shows him as shorter, unless the first vid used a trick ruler.

Regardless of which vid is more accurate (or less inaccurate) your pic should demonstrate to the "7" is average" and "I believe in 10, 11 and 12" monster cocks" brigade how big 7" NBP really is. It's the size most of the big-cock porn stars are IMO.

 

[D_Aberchirder_Crustinuts]

Boz is a good example of the phenomena of both midget big-cock pornstars and the tendency to add a couple of inches on their height, as well as their cock-sizes. He's listed in IAFD as 5'5".

Boz is indeed a strange bird. He's one of those "chameleon dick" guys who seems to dramatically change penis size (even at equally full erection quality) depending on what scene you're watching. There are times where I would swear he was as big as any monster dick in porn, and others where you feel you've almost got visual proof that he isn't much over 7. Danny Dong has some of that happening as well, but nowhere near like Boz. I've lately been figuring it has a lot to do with the overall shape of his dick and shaft, and the proportions of everything.

Crunch

 

[drabman]

Well according to this Youtube video someone pointed out in another forum, Nina Hartley is often with guys ten inches or better in her films, but she doesn't really enjoy those ten inch cocks, so the regular size 7 to 8 inch guys shouldn't feel bad (there are actually ways you can compensate)...

Nina Hartley, while in many ways a very sensible and interesting person to listen to, still gets paid by the Porn industry and so is as dependent on perpetuating its core myths as anyone else in Porn - one of those myths being the ludicrous claims of certain actors' monster cock sizes.

I guess most of those guys from back in the day were a couple inches longer than that stuff that's out there now...

Not the ones I've seen. Ron Jeremy is often cited as one of the bigger dicks from the classic era and he's nowhere near ten inches, whatever he might claim.

 

[drabman]

Boz is indeed a strange bird. He's one of those "chameleon dick" guys who seems to dramatically change penis size (even at equally full erection quality) depending on what scene you're watching. There are times where I would swear he was as big as any monster dick in porn, and others where you feel you've almost got visual proof that he isn't much over 7. Danny Dong has some of that happening as well, but nowhere near like Boz. I've lately been figuring it has a lot to do with the overall shape of his dick and shaft, and the proportions of everything.

Crunch

I suspect that might be the old fish-eye trick.

Fish-eye is often derided by the fantasists - they seem to believe that it involves something akin to glaringly obvious Industrial Light And Magic CGI and that since nothing like that is usually seen, fish-eye can't exist. However it's often subtle, which is kind of the whole point in using it in the first place. You sometimes have to analyse the vid quite carefully - when you notice that say, the female star's hand is actually unfeasibly huge when you compare it to objects in shot that you roughly know the size of, you can tell that fish-eye and the old perspective tricks are in full effect.

 

[D_Aberchirder_Crustinuts]

Not the ones I've seen. Ron Jeremy is often cited as one of the bigger dicks from the classic era and he's nowhere near ten inches, whatever he might claim.

Hi again Drabman,

I probably should have put a sarcastic smiley or something on that post. :biggrin1:

Yeah, most of the "big" guys from back then would probably be in the average porn star range today, which is what made the comments so laughable. Even if she were talking about "all those ten inch guys" and referring to modern day stars, it wouldn't make much sense.

I do find it kind of gross that she's pretending to "help" smaller guys and pushing that garbage at the same time though. Her new off-camera position will make her seem that much more credible there.

Take Care

 

[rope9839]

i own that video hes about 7 inches. 8 when she measured from 1 inch.

Which video is that?

 

[D_Amanda_Faulk]

There's a recent vid of Danny D/Danny Dong/Matt Hughes being measured by Tanya Tate. If you see the nonsensical lengths (no pun intended) to which she stoops in order to try and fabricate a measurement of 10", it should be clear to any rational person that he is nowhere near this length in reality.

Given that the gullible and the monster cock fantasists on this site often cite him as proof of the mythical 10" penis, hopefully this might give them food for thought.

I actually have a still, but I'm not sure how to post pics.

Posted here :

http://www.lpsg.com/169754-more-matt-hughes-straight-porn-60.html#post4194396

 

[drabman]

Hi again Drabman,

I probably should have put a sarcastic smiley or something on that post. :biggrin1:

Yeah, most of the "big" guys from back then would probably be in the average porn star range today, which is what made the comments so laughable. Even if she were talking about "all those ten inch guys" and referring to modern day stars, it wouldn't make much sense.

I do find it kind of gross that she's pretending to "help" smaller guys and pushing that garbage at the same time though. Her new off-camera position will make her seem that much more credible there.

Take Care

Sorry, should have noticed your dry sense of humour! I wasn't having a go though.

 

[drabman]

Posted here :

http://www.lpsg.com/169754-more-matt-hughes-straight-porn-60.html#post4194396

I await with interest the fantasists trying to explain away the fact that Matt Hughes is clearly nowhere near a correctly measured 10" in length.

After all, this is the bloke universally acknowledged as one of the biggest of the big-cock porn stars and therefore the biggest of the biggest of the big in the outside world. Certainly he's a rival to Mandingo - IMO Hughes could even be slightly bigger in reality, given the fact that he's as much as 4 or 5 inches taller and therefore will be short-changed by the camera in comparison to his vertically-challenged monster-cock colleague. If the biggest of the biggest is well short of 10", then who do they think actually reaches this mythical figure? (Cue avalanche of photoshopped jpegs).

 

[B_karonte]

I await with interest the fantasists trying to explain away the fact that Matt Hughes is clearly nowhere near a correctly measured 10" in length.

After all, this is the bloke universally acknowledged as one of the biggest of the big-cock porn stars and therefore the biggest of the biggest of the big in the outside world. Certainly he's a rival to Mandingo - IMO Hughes could even be slightly bigger in reality, given the fact that he's as much as 4 or 5 inches taller and therefore will be short-changed by the camera in comparison to his vertically-challenged monster-cock colleague. If the biggest of the biggest is well short of 10", then who do they think actually reaches this mythical figure? (Cue avalanche of photoshopped jpegs).

You know, people here simply LOOOOOOVE photoshopped jpegs!

In fact, most people here NEED photoshopped jpegs in order to keep their belief in 10" dongs...

 

[B_karonte]

I await with interest the fantasists trying to explain away the fact that Matt Hughes is clearly nowhere near a correctly measured 10" in length.

Prior to those fantasist showing stupid porn ¿"measurements"? :biggrin1: I'll explain here why Matt Hughes is nowhere near a correctly measured 10" in length.

Abbie Cat is 5 feet, 7 inches. Any girl of her small height would need 3 1/2 hands width to grab a 10" ruler from beggining to end.

In featured video Abbie Cat cover the whole shaft of DannyD with both hands as you can see in enclosed jpeg

Abbie Cat - Dr. Jekyll & Mister ... - XVIDEOS.COM

 

[SR_TJTbag]

How do we want pornstars to be measured? It`s only entertainment, so do we care if they lie and cheat? Everytime someone measures over 9, it is always a little scetchy, like a blury photo of bigfoot Why don`t they just make fake rulers or something instead?

Remember that the average is based on the medical surveys that use the bonepressed erect length method, while standing up, the penis is pointing straight out, ruler on top, pressed towards the pubic bone and measured all the way t the tip of the glans
This is how medical personel measure in surveys and research done for or by Kinsey institute, lifestyle condoms and other serious research on the subject.

 

[dirtyblacksummer]

Karonte... RFJ? Same shitty usage of emoticons, same beat ass hand width comparisons, and saying in his/her first post "You know, people here simply LOOOOOOVE photoshopped jpegs!" when it's his/her first month here. Suspicious. Suspicious indeed.

 

[ronaldos]

Karonte... RFJ? Same shitty usage of emoticons, same beat ass hand width comparisons, and saying in his/her first post "You know, people here simply LOOOOOOVE photoshopped jpegs!" when it's his/her first month here. Suspicious. Suspicious indeed.

LOL Definitely the same person.

 

[Crooked Cock]

How big do you think Criss Strokes is? http://homeofpornstars.com/bigboobchicks/018-big-tit-slut-kortney-kane-fucks-a-huge-cock/11.jpg

 

[robbie9]

I'd put Criss at 8.5 inches

 

[B_karonte]

How big do you think Criss Strokes is? http://homeofpornstars.com/bigboobchicks/018-big-tit-slut-kortney-kane-fucks-a-huge-cock/11.jpg

He's about the same length of Danny D. A two hands cock.

 

[drabman]

Karonte... RFJ? Same shitty usage of emoticons, same beat ass hand width comparisons, and saying in his/her first post "You know, people here simply LOOOOOOVE photoshopped jpegs!" when it's his/her first month here. Suspicious. Suspicious indeed.

Why do you care? Is it because you're on the other side of the argument and like so many on that side, don't wish to argue your case logically, but prefer resorting to pejorative remarks like, "beat-ass hand width comparisons", without condescending to explain exactly why said hand width comparisons are, "beat-ass"? For what it's worth, a number of hand width (and other) comparisons considered together is more than accurate enough to disprove some of the joke sizes claimed by, or on behalf of pornstars, although of course they can't prove exactly how big the pornstars are. RFJ didn't invent the technique after all - object comparison in photographs, albeit in a more detailed fashion, is a technique used in forensic science.

RFJ should never have been permanently banned IMO. Yes, he did get silly and abusive, but as I recall, it was only a misguided retaliation to silly and abusive personal attacks launched at him in the first place. I often see far worse behaviour on this site with no adverse consequences for the poster - I recall a post responding to one of my own, consisting of a full paragraph containing nothing but abuse, with no adverse consequences for the poster.

It was a shame that RFJ failed to realise how anyone attempting to puncture the cherished myths of the monster-cock fetishists and fantasists is almost certain to be subjected to this sort of pathetic trolling at some point and that he let the trolling get to him. At least he tried to back up his arguments with some sort of evidence, rather than resorting to the kind of hilarious tall stories beloved of the fantasists, such as ripping yarns about having once sucked off the 12" penis of a tall, handsome stranger in a public toilet.

I suspect in RFJ's case, someone who couldn't counter his arguments logically, took advantage of his misguided retaliation to shut him up in a cynical and sneaky fashion by reporting him. If he was banned, then many of those on the other side of the argument in that thread should have been banned as well IMO. However a better solution might have been to give all the abusive posters in that thread a warning and a temporary ban.

On a broader note, it is very interesting how often the monster-cock fantasists descend into abusive, ad-hominem attacks and what they seem to delude themselves into believing are clever rejoinders, instead of the embarassing examples of the lowest form of wit they really are. I don't recall the same thing coming from the other side to anything like the same degree - it seems that some people jealously guard their sexual fantasies and the heroes they worship with a high degree of emotion.