Measured porn stars??

[deleted978960]

2. There is a total extrapolation error likely with the pixels because everything is just multiplied. So if your measurement of her hand is off 0.1 (i know you said you used average but you also have to take into account open or close position of hands it is not precise) or if NBP starts 0.1 further down from where you started, then you multiply it by the ratio of pixels rati you are multiplying that error by like between 2 and 3. For example you guess her hand at 2.9 and its really 3 because her hand is spread out a bit more than how theyd o it in study. That 0.1 error becomes close to 0.3 over a whole dick. Same with where NBP should start etc....

i put my hand in a similar position as in the pic let's say my hand was 79 mm i know my hand breadth is 90 mm and the average female hand is 74 mm that would make her hand 64.9 mm and so on if you read sdp thread you would understand that

1. Yes but that is about the pics themselves not your analysis of them and discarding certain ones which wasnt my point. I understand there are many and they average out and removing a few outliers wont change the overall average that much. My point is if your general technique is getting an extrapolated error of 0.4 inches (by 0.1 less NBP start than we would, or hand positioning etc) that would apply to each and every pic you analyze NOT about the outlier pics themselves.

see the pic i posted in the last page that;s where i start i may have started the measurement incorrectly in the pic zaromiski posted but that because as i said his dick was angled this is not the case anymore since i eliminated all the angled pics

 

[deleted978960]

1. Yes but that is about the pics themselves not your analysis of them and discarding certain ones which wasnt my point. I understand there are many and they average out and removing a few outliers wont change the overall average that much. My point is if your general technique is getting an extrapolated error of 0.4 inches (by 0.1 less NBP start than we would, or hand positioning etc) that would apply to each and every pic you analyze NOT about the outlier pics themselves.

2. There is a total extrapolation error likely with the pixels because everything is just multiplied. So if your measurement of her hand is off 0.1 (i know you said you used average but you also have to take into account open or close position of hands it is not precise) or if NBP starts 0.1 further down from where you started, then you multiply it by the ratio of pixels rati you are multiplying that error by like between 2 and 3. For example you guess her hand at 2.9 and its really 3 because her hand is spread out a bit more than how theyd o it in study. That 0.1 error becomes close to 0.3 over a whole dick. Same with where NBP should start etc....

Also your theory is totally wrong if i start 0.1" up the shaft and got 6.15" then that's his length if we start a legit measurement 0.1" up the shaft and he would be only 0.1" longer if measured correctly

 

[strivingforperfection]

Also your theory is totally wrong if i start 0.1" up the shaft and got 6.15" then that's his length if we start a legit measurement 0.1" up the shaft and he would be only 0.1" longer if measured correctly

No you are breaking the dick in sections and extrapolating, that was just 1 example also. You are doing what you do best, attacking each point made back and forth but not addressing the overall point. It is really quite comical the tactics you are using.

 

[Zaromski]

No you are breaking the dick in sections and extrapolating, that was just 1 example also. You are doing what you do best, attacking each point made back and forth but not addressing the overall point. It is really quite comical the tactics you are using.

Maybe unknownuserx has legal training?

 

[Zaromski]

Just to be clear, I think both unknownuserx and Rokid have done some good work on this thread, but it is clear that they are definitely robbing a lot of pornstar's at least 0.2'' in length at the minimum in the pics they analysis a lot of the time.

 

[RokiD]

This.
unknownuserx and Rokid shouldn't be starting measurements at points like the yellow line in this pic.

This measurment isnt legit at all, criss wanted cheat by pressing skin, fat pat and ligs with his thumb so we dont know where it should start in other measuremnts he was measured 6.5" on top and 7" to the side.

What you make of this?
Don't they in medical studies start the measurement where the skin from the stomach meets exactly the top of the penis shaft?
You seem to be starting it slightly before, however, Rokis is much more guilty of this though.

This is correct and I dont know how she could slide her hand down the shaft without hitting her pinky on his base
like its happening here

the only thing I would change is line should be aslant like here

 

[Zaromski]

Analyzed Prince with rotated photo and concluded he is 6,6/8-6,7/8" on this photo
View attachment 877393

Here is another example, to me Prince looks 7'' there but somehow he is calculated to be 6,6/8- 6,7/8'' length here. The measurement starts up his penile shaft instead of where the penile shaft meets the pubic skin at the top of his shaft.

 

[deleted978960]

Here is another example, to me Prince looks 7'' there but somehow he is calculated to be 6,6/8- 6,7/8'' length here. The measurement starts up his penile shaft instead of where the penile shaft meets the pubic skin at the top of his shaft.

the ruler is angled the inches at the base are bigger than the inches at the glans

 

[RokiD]

Here is another example, to me Prince looks 7'' there but somehow he is calculated to be 6,6/8- 6,7/8'' length here. The measurement starts up his penile shaft instead of where the penile shaft meets the pubic skin at the top of his shaft.

to me looks like 7" when tape is not same angle as dick but placed on top would be under 7"

 

[Zaromski]

the ruler is angled the inches at the base are bigger than the inches at the glans

I was referring to the measurement using the top ruler, it really should have started at about the 1.5 mark at the earliest, that is where the NBP starting point for the measurement would have been placed in a medical study on penis size, you guys appear to be deliberately starting it up the shaft instead of where it should start, possibly deliberately robbing the pornstars of some length.

 

[RokiD]

the ruler is angled the inches at the base are bigger than the inches at the glans

yes, I have spotted it too, she pulls his dick to the side a bit to get bigger number on the tape

 

[deleted978960]

I was referring to the measurement using the top ruler, it really should have started at about the 1.5 mark at the earliest, that is where the NBP starting point for the measurement would have been placed in a medical study on penis size, you guys appear to be deliberately starting it up the shaft instead of where it should start, possibly deliberately robbing the pornstars of some length.

i didn't know that there was on top measurement for prince, can you show it to me again ??

 

[RokiD]

I was referring to the measurement using the top ruler, it really should have started at about the 1.5 mark at the earliest, that is where the NBP starting point for the measurement would have been placed in a medical study on penis size, you guys appear to be deliberately starting it up the shaft instead of where it should start, possibly deliberately robbing the pornstars of some length.

I dont see how he colud get robbed if he is the one who cheat - lol that why he dont measure on top cause knows whats gonna happend

 

[Zaromski]

i didn't know that there was on top measurement for prince, can you show it to me again ??

Analyzed Prince with rotated photo and concluded he is 6,6/8-6,7/8" on this photo
View attachment 877393

In the above pic the ruler that was transferred to the top should have started at the 1.5 Mark when calculating the measurement.

 

[RokiD]

In the above pic the ruler that was transferred to the top should have started at the 1.5 Mark when calculating the measurement.

it will make him smaller only cause lower numbers are wider - still 6.75" nbp

 

[Cielostrong2]

I dont see how he colud get robbed if he is the one who cheat - lol that why he dont measure on top cause knows whats gonna happend
View attachment 936052

it will make him smaller only cause lower numbers are wider - still 6.75" nbp
View attachment 936065

I get 6.8 for him.

However, we can try to measure along his 'curve' that might boost him a bit. At the very least I got 6.5ish or 6.6ish for him. Prince easily clears 6 inches and easily hits that 6.5 inch marker but the only way he hits +7.0 inches is by being overly generous or by pushing in BP or if he was not fully erect here or if he has since enlarged his penis.

If you start at the redline i made then he goes over 7.0 inches but it is clearly cheating because it touching his balls does not count and then he becomes 7.3 inches. Starting at that redline adds about 0.30 inches I think.

If I start where you start and everyone else says and I end at the green line you get almost 6.9 or rounds to 6.9 still short of 7 inches. 6.75 inches can round to 6.8 and is what happened when i analyzed it anyhow. But yeah I agree he is sub 7.0 but not by much. I tried to measure along his curve but am struggling on that.

 

[Cielostrong2]

This method is very variable...the averaging over several pics makes sense but then you need someone who is really accurate and isnt trying to get the lowest possible figure and will take the exact average female hand not less or more over 100s of pics and not draw lines even slightly biased toward robbing size. A difference of even 0.1 inch from true hand width, or glans length, or where the NBP starts could make a 0.5 inch overall difference or more in dick size guess when extrapolated and combined with other errors (if more than 1 of these is present.)

you should get on the pixel thing. I am doing it. I can tell you how it is not hard.

 

[RokiD]

6 3/4 to 6 7/8 for prince is imo accurate, he wasnt also bigger (if placed on top) than coca cola bottle to the side and that was about 6.8" for him and he was rock hard

 

[deleted978960]

I get 6.8 for him.

However, we can try to measure along his 'curve' that might boost him a bit. At the very least I got 6.5ish or 6.6ish for him. Prince easily clears 6 inches and easily hits that 6.5 inch marker but the only way he hits +7.0 inches is by being overly generous or by pushing in BP or if he was not fully erect here or if he has since enlarged his penis.

If you start at the redline i made then he goes over 7.0 inches but it is clearly cheating because it touching his balls does not count and then he becomes 7.3 inches. Starting at that redline adds about 0.30 inches I think.

If I start where you start and everyone else says and I end at the green line you get almost 6.9 or rounds to 6.9 still short of 7 inches. 6.75 inches can round to 6.8 and is what happened when i analyzed it anyhow. But yeah I agree he is sub 7.0 but not by much. I tried to measure along his curve but am struggling on that.

see what happened when you used an accurate method instead of just guessing based on how big he looks, congratulation you joined the realistic group i agree he is around 6.75"

 

[deleted978960]

tbh the hand method is time consuming i was thinking of improving it, the biggest issue is that we don't know the real hand size of the girl/man that's why we need to do a large number of pics but if we can figure out the real hand size of the person holding the dick this would make it much easier for example here is danny holding his dildo(see the attachment) the dildo is exactly 10.5" w/o suction cup which is 951 pix his middle and ring finger(line 1) are 118 pix that would be about 1.3" when i place my fingers in the same position they measure 1.45" then i measured at the second line (line 2) it was 167 pix which is 1.84" i also measured my fingers the same way and i got 2.08"
what do you guys think???