I would definitely put Henrique Lima on TOP!
Most Perfect Male Ever?
- Thread starter Rockford Tyson
- Start date
This obsession with skull proportions and face symmetry eerily reminds me of the dark days of phrenology, when physicians thought they could tell aristocrats from criminals simply by the definition of their forehead, mouth, ears yada yada. Got a receding chin? Probably a sexual predator. Hooked nose? Jew! Deep-set eyes? Most likely an atavistic sport and a retard...
It's also indicative of a very cold, cynical and inhuman standard of approaching attraction. Like asking ChatGTP about its beauty ideals and opinion about someone's fuckability...
The difference between phrenology and this is that phrenology was pseudo-science, based on wrong assumptions about human nature and "racial theory", etc.
This is actually based on science because reserachers noted that ALL people that are considered attractive without exceptions have certai things in common like facial symmetry a certain length of jaw-to-ramus proportion, a cerain prop[ortion between the lower, mid and upper face and certain distance between the eyes, mout and lips. Besides position of cheek bones etc.
Conversely phrenology failed to prove a link between criminality and certain skull shapes or between certain facial attributes and personlaity or between certain "races" and intelligence.
So no, the two things are not the same. One is based on assumptions(phrenology) while the other is based on experiment and proof where the hypothesis is proven by correlation between certain physical features and attraction.
But how is "attraction" defined? You say ALL people (bold), which is a bold statement indeed. Have they asked all people? Has every single person on this planet given a detailed account on their personal beauty ideals? I doubt that...
I see some fallacies at work here
First one: My assumption is (and that seems plausible) that researchers have found out that there are certain facial features that are deemed beautiful according to the beauty ideals of the AVERAGE human. But to infer that the beauty ideals and taste of an individual matches that of the average is an ecological or population fallacy. Just because most people think that trait xy is attractive doesn't mean that all people do so.
Second: Just because trait xy is deemed beautiful by the average member of a population does not indicate that trait xy is something that can objectively be verified as beautiful. The average people in ancient Greece thought the earth was flat. Just because almost all of them believed so didn't mean that the flatness of the earth was objectively true then, and suddenly became objectively false once proven so. It was never true from the beginning.
Third: I have no doubt that there is a correlation between specific facial features and what the average person considers beautiful. But even if literally all people considered one specific feature as beautiful, and even if we define beauty as something that can be objectively measured because it is based on specific features that are considered beautiful by all (or most) individuals, this does NOT mean that someone who shows a number of such features is PERFECTLY beautiful, or that such a feature is necessary at all for someone to be considered perfectly beautiful.
For example, I assume that almost all people in the western hemisphere would agree that french fries are a delicious and tasty food. Does that mean that the absence or presence of french fries in an individual dish has an impact on whether people would consider it a perfect dish? As in "the most tasteful and delicious dish imaginable"? Or would we deduce that if almost all people considered french fries, milk chocolate and garlic as totally tasty and delicious components, that all three of them together match into one perfect meal? Urks...
QuietPrelude
Worshipped Member
That attractive people share traits in common is nothing new. The ancient Greeks spoke of the "golden mean".
Yes, all attractive people share things i common. For instance, all the stupid pictures that people posted in this thread of men that they think are better looking than Chico Lachowski have a lot more in common with Chico than the average person. Such as:
- Facial symmetry.
- A well-defined jawline.
- Prportion between the lower, middle and upper face.
- A long ramus.
- Almond-shaped eyes with a positive canthal tilt.
- High cheek bones)in men)
- Thick eye brows(both sexes)
- Thick brow ridge(men only)
- Full lips.
I find it hilarious that the people in this thread tried to disprove me by posting pictures of men that have the exact characteristics of Chico Lachowski, except to a lower degree.
.The saying "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder" actually only applies when it comes to people that have these same characteristics. For instance, you get 2 men that both have highly symmetrical features with a clear jawline, etc.
Some people prefer more masculine-looking men, while others prefer pretty boys. Some people prefer Caucasian features, while others prefer Latino or Black features. Some prefer body hair and facial hair while others don't, etc.
But ALL attractive people will share the common traits of facial symmetry, proportions, balance and a well-developed skeletal structure. ALL of them. "All" as in "each and every single one of them".
If this is the case, then tell me if you find this face attractive. This person has all the facial and cranial characteristics of Chico Lachowski in reverse. Trust me, NO ONE finds this face attractive.
And he’d had a voice that just made my panties fall.
For those of you complainiing that Chico is beautiful but his body is meh, the most beautiful boy in the history of our species gives you some of his skin.
What would you do if Mr.Lachowski walked up to you naked and said: "Do what you want with my body.". How many of you would be man enough to handle him?
What would you do if Mr.Lachowski walked up to you naked and said: "Do what you want with my body.". How many of you would be man enough to handle him?
Here's an interesting fact about Chico: when he was 18, he was living in NYC and an agent from Vogue Magazine saw him at a Versace show and decided that he looked like "the perfect American teen boy", and wanted to cast him as the cover for "Teen Vogue". The problem: he is not an American. But the people at Teen Vogue decided that he was just too perfect for the cover for them to pass on the opportunity. So what they did was to replace the title of the article on him from:"The Perfect all-American teen boy", to just "The Perfect Teen Boy". But they still made him to look as much as an all-American boy as possible. They even had him dress in a high school American football quarterback uniform. Here is the video of the photographic shoot. The only thing that I can say in reply to this shoot is:
"Dear Lord have mercy!"
"Dear Lord have mercy!"
Is there ANYONE MORE PERFECT on IG & OF than bodybuilder CHARLIE LONDON?
(go ahead and gape)
![Charlie.jpg]( "Charlie.jpg")
(go ahead and gape)
Jose Manuel Muñoz ... the MUSCLES ... the VEINS ... the BULGE ... the FACE ... the MAN-TITS .... UNNNGGGGGGGGGGH!
![joseema.jpg]( "joseema.jpg")
Words fail me when it cums to JANGWOONG.JW ... UNNGGGHHHH!
(Splat)
![jangwoong copy.jpg]( "jangwoong copy.jpg")
(Splat)
One morning you open your groggy eyes to this ...
![GP face.jpg]( "GP face.jpg")
... and then you remember that yesterday you married GUILHERME FILPO.
![GP bath x2.jpg]( "GP bath x2.jpg")
Now that you're wide awake, what do you do next?
... and then you remember that yesterday you married GUILHERME FILPO.
Now that you're wide awake, what do you do next?
I nominate HANK MEYER for "MOST PERFECT DILF EVER."
![Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 2.37.27 PM.png]( "Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 2.37.27 PM.png")
whoa!! GREAT physqiqe! Never saw him before! To answer your question, I'd tell him "no need to get up...stay just like that...."One morning you open your groggy eyes to this ...
View attachment 135782841
... and then you remember that yesterday you married GUILHERME FILPO.
View attachment 135782901
Now that you're wide awake, what do you do next?
If you approach real-life discussions in the manner you've demonstrated in this thread, you've got to be one of the most unappealing people that others come across. Arrogance and condescension. Not the best way to engage others.
Just relax a little. No one is trying to "prove you wrong". Just providing a different preference. In the future, I suggest you start all your posts with "I just want to say what I want to say so dont ANYBODY make a comment!! This is my thread and mine alone! I just want to put this out there because I have the only and best opinion so no one has the right to say otherwise!" That way no one will make the mistake of unintentionally upsetting you and throwing you into a tizzy. You sound like you could have an aneurism at any second. I do apologize-- I didnt know no one was supposed to offer a differing opinion, that this forum was designed for us to read your comments, accept them as the definitive fact, smile, and move on so you wont be offended by someone having other tastes than yours. So sorry. Wont happen again. And all the best with the anger management therapy. Carrying that much rancor over a pretty girl....oh sorry, boy, pretty boy...has GOT to be tough.
Similar threads
