Nick Sandell Of
- Thread starter Hello66682
- Start date
-
- Tags
- nick sandell onlyfans
It is actually quite nicely sized, perhaps a bit discolored, but otherwise lovely. 120 pages of posts seem to think he has something to offer. But I am sure you just put Nick right to shame, huh?
Rubbish. He is a normal healthy man, who was, like so many of his contemporaries, circumcised, probably at birth to ensure he never had any health problems in that area, as some of us who were not so lucky did. It probably took 15 minutes and the baby was probably over it in a couple of days. He certainly doesn't remember it being done, and he is happy and confident showing it now. That really was an insulting and distasteful thing to say, not just about him, but any other cut man who you take exception to.
Great to see- and the sound of the lube is pure ASMR. Thanks for sharing
Um..
Yeah what that the person was said was disgusting but nothing about circumcision should be defended. It's still barbaric that's its done to literal babies with zero consent.
Last edited:
There are significant sexual and health benefits to being uncircumcised. Anyone who has health problems down there usually is unsanitary or unsafe, and it has nothing to do with being uncircumcised.
Bigboaster and Max. The American body concerned with paediatric medicine have stated in terms that uncircumcised babies and more likely to have waterworks problems and infections than circumcised babies.
I think everyone should get away from this idea that parents are inflicting a cruel punishment on their sons at birth - 99% of them are doing what every parent does - doing the best they can for them to ensure they have a healthy and happy life. There is no cruel intent. A baby can't consent to have the umbilical chord cut, or any medical or dental work needed in early childhood. parents and doctors make the decision about what is best for the child. Though it is highly unlikely I will ever have a son, based on my childhood experiences and the fear something of the sort might happen to him, I would have him circumcised at birth. Believe me, it is much more painful and embarrassing at 16!
I agree that the idea that foreskins are sold to the cosmetic industry, if true, seems mercenery and in poor taste, and should be stopped, but, gentleman, as regards the cleanliness point that Max makes, I was once a little boy, and little boys are not exactly the watchword for hygiene. I was uncircumcised for the first 16 years of my life and the fact that I was unable to pull back my over-lengthy foreskin to wash underneath it, didn't bother me at all till I was 14 - also going to a British school I was surrounded at every PE lesson , and the post lesson showers, by other lads the same age, and being British most were uncut. Their ideas of washing under their foreskins was to pee through the pinhole opening of their (probably) balanitis infected foreskins. I was the same and just as bad. I just don't understand, if a parent or doctor sees a boy with an excess of foreskin why the subject and a possible solution are not discussed. I am not saying make it compulsory, but let it be offered
If a lad or man has a very short foreskin which doesn't overhang the glans then fair enough - some of the best sex I ever had was a bloke also called Andy, who was very clean and had a short foreskin. The biggest shock I ever had came from a Dutch guy (no offence, please, to any readers in Holland) who had a very long skin and a very tight fit. He told me that most blokes in Holland had the same type and shape of skin. Well, if that is what they want, so be it, but excuse me if I say no thanks, and I am glad that what I had done in 1999 was done.
Last edited by a moderator:
losdanger
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2020
- Posts
- 1,989
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 13,666
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Maybe you all should start (or find) a thread about circumcision and health and chat about it there. Nick's dick is gorgeous and looks 100% fine and normal for a circumcised American. The dark ring is just the cut line... a disgusting and barbaric procedure but like a lot of things in the good old USA, misinformation and ignorance has kept the practice going up til now.
But I digress... can you all please focus on Nick's overall beauty and get off his cock... cuz it's my turn to get up on it! ;-)
But I digress... can you all please focus on Nick's overall beauty and get off his cock... cuz it's my turn to get up on it! ;-)
Is his OF worth it? or he just jerk off?
All you queens complaining about Nick’s cut dick would gobble it up given half a chance.
losdanger
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2020
- Posts
- 1,989
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 13,666
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Dude there’s tons of pics of dick in this thread… just hit the “most liked” link at the top or just Google “Nick Sandell naked” and you’ll see it.
Courtesy of Amsterdambrasil, who I was thanking for sharing you can see it in this download - his gf comes in for the last few seconds but only Nick touches his dick:
View attachment 35920151 .
Is the "My First Full Jackoff and Cum" video worth it? Do we actually get to see him cum? Has anyone seen it? Would love a review! Anyone have any favorite videos that are worth purchasing? Thanks!
Foreskin naturally lubricates and preserves sensitivity and pleasure. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
Max I am not going to get into a cut/uncut argument. I just repeat I have been both in my life and I am glad to be cut now. One of the pleasures for me, being dry, is that lube is very erotic for me., the feel, the coolness of it, even the sound of it
As for your second post, honestly I don't understand what you are saying - are you saying he was circumcised for using steroids or using steroids because he is cut?. I dare say a lot of uncircumcised men have misused drugs.
I am not a medical expert, and don't pretend to be - I just know I am grateful for my status and wouldn't want my foreskin back even if it were possible. On that latter point, I have had 22 years to "restore" I never have and never will. That should be the answer to that one.
The reason I used the word "rubbish" is because most American men of his age were circumcised at birth (RIC) - by Intactavists calling them mutilated, can you not understand the extra distress you are causing to men who are cut, and are unhappy or resent it?. They can't have it sown back on and you are just adding to that distress.
Some people don't know they need to wash their cocks at least once in awhile lol. Some foreskins are extremely tight and cause problems. That is not the norm. Doctors promote the mutilation to get paid.
But for those who are tight (as I was) it is a permanent solution that works. I'd rather be "mutilated" (according to the Intactavists) then spend my life feeling dirty and in pain. Others might feel differently, but I can only tell you what was true for me. Some men prefer to use creams, but the problem can reoccur at any time, often more than once, for others it might not, so that was my decision. That's all I know
And back to Nick Sandell!
Similar threads
