Random thoughts

prefer
chinesem light silk
no heavy weight allowed ha

ZXO4HtxxzX9SI19ua3LHy9bcBNAf91-rfJzzKWJSq3-E4ZfWnDA3HGd5CBvlCUeIuDXXuZ1GSOT7GK1BhmxOYImz3G39a4aI_23GlXR5cMC6Yhb9QH6ks9V6I7PaEIrXvCSRuexxAJ0=s0-d-e1-ft


Our favorite weighted blankets for a better night's sleep

Welcome additions to the bedroom.

for all yo ball enthusiasts


What’s really behind baseball’s recent home run surge

It might not (just) be foul play.


that
i do agree with
maybe 3x a week,but not excessive
- dr rbkwp
stop feeding the pharmaceutical corps

Why experts now say daily aspirin could do more harm than good
If you've never had a heart attack, you probably shouldn't be taking it.


Why experts now say daily aspirin could do more harm than good

If you've never had a heart attack, you probably shouldn't be taking it.

no doubt college sdtudents get up to wacky uummm fun ha grrrr


The weirdest things we learned this week: College students swallowed guppies for sport and chickens wore glasses

Plus: The man whose insatiable hunger drove him to do terrible things (including, allegedly, eating a toddler)
 
Most of What You Know About Daddy Longlegs Is Wrong
c70d3349-6fcd-49fb-d079-b15311972d90.jpg

The Better to Eat You With, My Dear

So right out of the gate, this playground legend is already kind of useless; the two kinds of daddy longlegs aren't even that closely related, so they can't both have the deadliest venom. And as a matter of fact, neither of them does.

When it comes to harvestmen, you might as well be just as afraid that a ladybug will bite you. These bugs don't have venom glands, fangs, or anything else they can use to subdue prey. They generally eat decomposing plants and animals, killing small prey here and there when the opportunity presents itself. But humans? As the saying goes, they're probably more scared of you than you are of them.


Cellar spiders do have venom and fangs, but for them, the legend just isn't based in fact: There's no evidence that their venom is toxic to humans, but there's also no evidence that their fangs can't penetrate human skin. According to entomologist Rick Vetter, there are no studies that have tested how lethal their venom is to mammals — even to lab mice. And while their fangs are pretty small, Vetter points out that they work the same way as the fearsome brown recluse spider, which is certainly able to bite humans. Most likely, a cellar spider could bite you, but it wouldn't cause much harm.


In the end, it's best to treat these creatures like any other harmless species: leave them be. If they're in your home, you could try trapping them under a glass and taking them outside. But playground legends aside, they're not a threat — no matter which daddy longlegs you're actually talking about.
 
never knew
how wonderful
Australia as well,god bless you all


The native animals, mostly reptiles and frogs, were removed from the 1,000ha construction footprint over seven years. Many were found curled up inside termite mounds which were carefully dismantled, first by excavators and then using hand tools to ensure none of the animals were crushed.



Gas plant construction makes WA history by moving 30,000 native animals to safety


Other mining companies urged to follow suit after contractors at Chevron’s Wheatstone LNG plant spend seven years relocating fauna

Calla Wahlquist

@callapilla
Thu 25 Jul 2019 19.00 BSTLast modified on Fri 26 Jul 201906.34 BS
81

Most of the animals relocated from the Wheatstone LNG plant site in Western Australia were reptiles, such as this central netted dragon (Ctenophorus nuchalis). Photograph: Supplied by Terrestrial Ecosystems.
Environment contractors who relocated 30,000 animals during the construction of the Wheatstone LNG plant in Western Australia have called on other mining companies to take a similar approach to protecting native fauna.

The native animals, mostly reptiles and frogs, were removed from the 1,000ha construction footprint over seven years. Many were found curled up inside termite mounds which were carefully dismantled, first by excavators and then using hand tools to ensure none of the animals were crushed.


FacebookTwitterPinterest
158 termite mounds were destroyed during the clearing of the Wheatstone LNG plant site. Each mound is a mini-ecosystem, and ecologists removed all vertebrate animals found inside and relocated them to similar habitats in the surrounding area. Photograph: Supplied by Terrestrial Ecosystems
It was the largest effort to remove animals from an industrial site in Western Australia. Scott Thompson, a partner and principal zoologist for contractor Terrestrial Ecosystems, who managed the move, said he hoped other companies would follow suit.

1381.jpg

FacebookTwitterPinterest
This desert spadefoot, or Notaden nichollsi, was one of 10,000 frogs or toads relocated from the LNG plant site during its seven-year construction. Photograph: Supplied by Terrestrial Ecosystems.
The relocation of animals began when the project was approved in 2011 and continued until August last year, after the first shipment of LNG.

Relocating terrestrial fauna was not part of the environmental conditions placed on the project, which largely concerned impact on seagrass beds and federally-listed marine species such as dugongs and sawfish.

“The first thing companies try to do is cut costs, and environment is one of the areas where they try to cut costs,” Thompson said. “This company went above and beyond what they had to do [and] had exceptional outcomes.”

They focused on microfauna, on the assumption that larger animals, such as kangaroos and wallabies, would move themselves. Midsized animals, such as echidnas and goannas, were the largest of those that needed help.

“They only go so far without finding a hole to hide in,” Thompson said.


FacebookTwitterPinterest
An echidna is moved to safety. Photograph: Supplied by Terrestrial Ecosystem
Gas plant construction makes WA history by moving 30,000 native animals to safety
 
Endangered species

Give endangered jaguars legal rights, Argentina campaigners ask court



With fewer than 20 left in the South American country’s Gran Chaco forest – the big cats could be classed as a ‘non-human person’



Uki Goñi in Buenos Aires

Fri 19 Jul 2019 19.28 BSTLast modified on Mon 22 Jul 201910.59Shares
363



A jaguar in the dwindling Gran Chaco forest of Argentina. Photograph: Pablo Petracci/Greenpeace Argentina
Argentina’s supreme court has been asked to recognize the legal rights of the South American jaguar, of which fewer than 20 individuals remain alive in the country’s Gran Chaco region.

The largest cat in the Americas once roamed the continent as far north as the Grand Canyon, but is now in decline across the entire western hemisphere.

In Argentina, the speckled feline has been driven to the brink of extinction by the destruction of habitat to make way for soy plantations and cattle ranches.

1812.jpg


Give endangered jaguars legal rights, Argentina campaigners ask court
 

incredible

Arctic ablaze in 'unprecedented' wildfires

5:16 pm on 27 July 2019
Share this


Wildfires are ravaging the Arctic, with areas of northern Siberia, northern Scandinavia, Alaska and Greenland engulfed in flames.

eight_col_71020723_l.jpg

"Unprecedented" wildfires are covering mostly uninhabited regions across eastern Russia, northern Scandinavia, Greenland and Alaska. Photo: 123RF

Lightning frequently triggers fires in the region but this year they have been worsened by summer temperatures that are higher than average because of climate change.

Plumes of smoke from the fires can be seen from space.

Mark Parrington, a wildfires expert at the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (Cams), described them as "unprecedented".

How bad is it?
There are hundreds of fires covering mostly uninhabited regions across eastern Russia, northern Scandinavia, Greenland and Alaska.

But smoke is affecting wider surrounding areas, engulfing some places completely.

Cities in eastern Russia have noted a significant decrease in air quality since the fires started.


Wja-mwS8


\\he smoke has reportedly reached Russia's Tyumen region in western Siberia, six time zones away from the fires on the east coast.

In June, the fires released an estimated 50 megatonnes of carbon dioxide - the equivalent of Sweden's annual carbon output, according to Cams.

How unusual is this?
Arctic fires are common between May and October and wildfires are a natural part of an ecosystem, offering some benefits for the environment, according to the Alaska Centers website.

But the intensity of these fires, as well as the large area they have taken up, make these unusual.

"It is unusual to see fires of this scale and duration at such high latitudes in June," said Mr Parrington.

"But temperatures in the Arctic have been increasing at a much faster rate than the global average, and warmer conditions encourage fires to grow and persist once they have been ignited."

Extremely dry ground and hotter than average temperatures, combined with heat lightning and strong winds, have caused the fires to spread aggressively.

The burning has been sustained by the forest ground, which consists of exposed, thawed, dried peat - a substance with high carbon content.

What is being done to tackle the fires?
Russian authorities are not tackling the majority of the fires as they argue the cost would be bigger than the damage caused by the flames.

"They do not threaten any settlements or the economy," the press service of the Krasnoyarsk Region forestry ministry told a Siberian news website.

The hashtags #putouttheSiberianfires and #saveSiberianforests are currently trending on Twitter as Russians complain the government is not doing enough to tackle the crisis.

Some argue that the Notre Dame fire in Paris received far more media attention than the forest fires.

"Remember how far the news about the Notre Dame fire spread? Now is the time to do the same about the Siberian forest fires," said one tweet.

Another said: "Let's not forget that nature is no less important than history. Numerous animals have lost their homes, and many of them are probably dead. Just thinking about this is painful."

Alaska Centers agree that "fire-suppression efforts sometimes are more damaging than the wildfire".

- BBC
 
Eastern_Red_Bat.jpeg




D5HBMSvf-D9D74x-wpk.png



ENVIRONMENT
Whales Are People Too
Could granting legal personhood save an endangered species?
BY LYNDSIE BOURGONPublished 15:12, Jul. 25, 2019

iStock/MarkMalleson


LAST SUMMER, the plight of the southern resident orcas—which migrate along the craggy Pacific shoreline between southeastern Alaska and central California and are icons of the Salish Sea—turned dramatic and inescapably anthropomorphic. A new mother , J35, carried her deceased calf draped over her nose throughout the coastal waters, buoying it for seventeen days. The public outpouring in response was swift. How could you not cry? Here was a mother that could not let go of her child, which had died in a marine habitat that’s a watery flashpoint for political and economic debate in western Canada. At the same time, scientists had sounded the alarm that some of the orcas were starving to death: the Chinook salmon population that the resident orcas rely on is endangered too. The whales were a perfect backdrop on which to project what scholar Kriss Kevorkian calls “environmental grief”—a reaction that stems from the loss of ecosystems.

Whales Are People Too | The Walrus
 
IF THE ZOMBIES DON'T GET YOU, THE WILD ANIMALS AND FERAL DOGS WILL
Ye Aung Thu/Getty Images


When the zombie outbreak finally happens, we know our loyal dogs will be at our sides, ready to defend us against the hordes of undead. Except you know it won't really be like that, right?

If your dog doesn't get eaten by a zombie there's not much chance that he's going to stick around once the kibble in your emergency kit runs out. He'll go feral, along with all those other dogs whose families joined the ranks of the undead. And packs of feral dogs are even more dangerous than packs of shambling zombies because feral dogs are actually fast, they have jaws made for biting and killing, their brains still work, and they don't respond to "sit."


if-the-zombies-dont-get-you-the-wild-animals-and-feral-dogs-will-1564174580.jpg



Happily, How Stuff Works seems to think that zombies would have as much to fear from feral dogs and other wild animals as humans would — as far as most carnivores are concerned, an animated corpse is, after all, really just some walking pork chops and a ham butt. Of course that's only true until those corpses start to stink — even vultures won't go near an animal that's in advanced stages of decomposition. So all that really means is you don't have to worry so much about the fresh corpses. The slimy, stinking, horrifying ones are still going to be a huge problem. Awesome.

Read More: Why you'd never survive a zombie apocalypse

yahoooo
happy balance of existence us earthlings
dont deserve anything else thats for sure

and/or
never a truer word spoken


IF THE WILD ANIMALS AND FERAL DOGS DON'T GET YOU, OTHER HUMANS WILL

if-the-wild-animals-and-feral-dogs-dont-get-you-other-humans-will-1564174580.jpg


Any Walking Dead fan can tell you that it isn't really the dead we have to fear in the event of an apocalypse — it's the living. In the absence of law and order and in the presence of mortal peril, there really aren't any limits to what human beings might do in the interests of their own survival. The Zombie Research Society recommends forming a gang, preferably in advance of the apocalypse, so you'll all be prepared to deal with the many other post-apocalypse gangs that will be looting, killing, and generally behaving terribly.

It's not just evil people you'll have to contend with; it's also scared, desperate people. Once the hordes take over, there really aren't going to be a lot of secure places left in the world. And as soon as you've cleared the undead from your prison, remote island, or underground bunker, you can be pretty sure someone is going to come along and try to take it all away from you. So you not only have to be prepared to defend yourself against the dead, you also have to be prepared to defend yourself against the living. And shooting a super-scary rotting corpse is not the same thing as shooting a desperate band of survivors who would do just about anything for security.

Read More: Why you'd never survive a zombie apocalypse



Read More: Why you'd never survive a zombie apocalypse
 
Last edited:
The First Step to Getting Rid of Invasive Lionfish? Listen Closely …
Scientists have recorded the “roar” of the unwanted reef predators.
BY SAMIR S. PATELMAY 15, 2017




image.jpg

Clearfin lionfish. THE HIGH FIN SPERM WHALE/CC BY-SA 3.0

THEY CAN BE AWFUL PRETTY, but there are very few circumstances under which a lionfish is a welcome sight on a coral reef. They are voracious, aggressive, and territorial—and surrounded by a halo of long, twitchy, venomous spines. For divers and fishermen there is the risk of a sting, but it’s worse for full-time reef dwellers. One study conducted in the Bahamas by marine biologists from Oregon State University found that just one lionfish took out 80 percent of the juvenile fish in its territory. In the Caribbean, East Coast of the United States, and other places outside of their usual range on Indo-Pacific reefs, they are an invasive scourge with few natural predators.

Devising new strategies for limiting lionfish populations means learning as much as possible about their biology and behavior, including the sounds that they make. Scientists in North Carolina recently identified and recorded for the first time the “roar” of the lionfish, which is more of a guttural heartbeat that grows into a drum-like thumping when they’re agitated.

Lionfish 'Roar' May Be Key to Limiting Their Numbers
 
to me
its that ignorant Trump styile denying that puts a country in a position its in now
with liars and decitful people running the place
so many things have happened in a negative sense that isent it better to be very wary and cautious
even if that takes the next 50 plus years



No, Lyme disease is not an escaped military bioweapon, despite what conspiracy theorists say

Ticks could spread weaponized bacteria – but B. burgdorferi that causes Lyme isn’t one of them.



Everything you need to know about shark bites

Sharks: They're just not that into you.
 
JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK
The Iconic Joshua Tree Is in Trouble
Nexus Media
Jul. 29, 2019 09:23AM ESTPOPULAR

Pixabay




The Iconic Joshua Tree Is in Trouble



By Marlene Cimons

Botanist Lynn Sweet regularly treks through California's Joshua Tree National Park, nearly 800,000 acres that lie at the intersection of the Mojave and Colorado deserts. She likes to photograph the gnarly, spikey-limbed trees, which look — as some have observed — like a picture from a Dr. Seuss children's book.

Much as many of the park's million or more yearly tourists do, she marvels at their strange beauty. "They have an amazing shape," she said. She said they don't bloom every year, but when they do it's very special. "This year, the plants flowered earlier than most people had ever seen. Some plants started flowering in November, and then the number of trees in flower increased until springtime, when nearly every tree was in flower. It was incredible," she said.

The trees, legend has it, were named after the Biblical figure Joshua by 19th century Mormons who thought their upwardly outstretched limbs resembled arms raised in prayer. The trees have been around since the Pleistocene, which began more than 2 million years ago and concluded at the end of the last ice age. Woolly mammoths, mastodons, giant cave bears and saber-toothed tigers roamed among them. The animals are long gone, but these iconic trees still exist.

But scientists like Sweet fear they might not be here much longer if climate change continues unabated. For many Joshua trees, this century could be their last. They've managed to tolerate the assaults of prehistoric times, only to fall prey to industrial advances that are now heating up the planet.

"Whereas shifts in the past may have been major — such as during the Pleistocene — the current shifts are very rapid," Sweet said. The temperatures are rising so fast, that Joshua trees are little able to migrate to cooler areas. Additionally the species, "now has barriers, such as roads and development to move across," she said.

Sweet, a plant ecologist at the University of California Riverside's Center for Conservation Biology, partnering with the Earthwatch Institute, enlisted volunteers to help collect data on about 4,000 trees in the park to determine whether climate change already has had an impact. She mapped out where Joshua trees live in the park to determine which conditions they do best in, and then compared that with projections of what Joshua Tree National Park will like look later this century.

"I chose climate change projections for end-of-century," she explained. She looked at how much the climate will change if humans tackle the problem, and how much it will change if humans do nothing. "In the upper end, where we do nothing to address climate change, we may see almost no more habitat for the Joshua tree in the Park,"

Her calculations suggest that addressing climate change could save 19 percent of the trees after 2070. If nothing is done, however, the park likely only would keep a scant 0.02 percent. The study appears in the journal Ecosphere.

The work builds upon an earlier study in 2012, also by UC Riverside researchers, which found the trees would begin to vanish if temperatures rose 3 degrees C. The newest study considered additional factors, such as soil moisture estimates and precipitation, among others.

The trees already have begun drifting to higher areas in the park, where they might escape the heat and have a better chance at producing younger plants, she said. In hot areas, however, tress reproduce less — and those that do are dying, the study said. Older trees, which can live as long as 300 years, can store large amounts of water, which helps them cope with drought. But younger trees lack this capacity, and are less likely to survive.

Prolonged droughts make things difficult for animals and plants that need water, prompting many species to relocate to areas that are more hospitable, often cooler, wetter and higher. "For the Joshua tree, on broad, flat areas, this is like outrunning a very wide flash flood," Sweet said. "Over flat ground, great distances are involved to escape the threat of hotter, drier temperatures. Moving upslope to where it's cooler is another way to escape the heat, but these areas may or may not be suitable to the root system or growth of the Joshua tree."

The tree is also missing a key ally that previously helped it migrate to new areas. "The Joshua tree is pretty tough," she said. "It is built to survive and persist through droughts. In the past, the species as a whole was able to migrate distances using its likely primary disperser, the Shasta ground sloth. Since this species is [now] extinct, the tree can no longer migrate great distances. This is a problem with this new, more rapid shift in climate."

Also, the trees in the western Mojave differ from those further to the east in Utah and Nevada, facing special challenges, Sweet said. "Joshua trees have a particular pollinator and only this insect, a yucca moth, can pollinate them," she said. "The relationship is thus really special — there is benefit for both the insect and the moth in the relationship. The moth gets food for its larvae, and the Joshua tree is able to get pollen moved from tree to tree. No other insect can do this. Thus, though common, it's really a fragile existence. If climate change affects the moth in a different way than the tree, we may be in tro

img.jpg


The study also found that wildfires pose an additional hazard, as invasive plants and shrubs — fueled by smog and car exhaust — serve as kindling for the blazes. The scientists said that the U.S. Park Service — also a partner in the work — has been trying to reduce the danger by eliminating many of the plants.

As a park visitor, Sweet continues to find the trees inspiring. "I really enjoy watching wildlife use the trees," she said. "I've spent time watching Orioles move in and out of nests on the trees. I've seen spiny lizards darting up and down the trunks. It's just such an important structure in the habitat. It's not a shy tree. It's the most noticeable component of the [park] and the Mojave."

img.jpg



But as a scientist, she believes that only aggressive climate mitigation can save them. "Changes are already occurring on the landscape in terms of where the new trees are occurring, and this supports the predictions about future changes," she said. "We know things may get worse. The degree to which this happens depe
national parks california joshua tree national park