The $10,000 10-inch challenge

[grandunification]

No, the mean erect length was 12.9cm. That's 5.078"

American Urological Association

Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation. - PubMed - NCBI

The "functional length" as they called it was 6.2". That's what they mean by bone pressed.

I find it amazing that people are in denial that the average cock is a bit over 6" erect depending on the measuring technique. You just desperately need the average to be as low as possible so you can feel good about yourselves. Fact is, 8 X 6.5 is pretty common, you'll just have to live with it.

 

[Shepardson]

Fact is, 8 X 6.5 is pretty common

I'd be interested to know your estimations of some of the monster dick porn stars or even the larger members on this site.

 

[hzs3fg]

The "functional length" as they called it was 6.2". That's what they mean by bone pressed.

I find it amazing that people are in denial that the average cock is a bit over 6" erect depending on the measuring technique. You just desperately need the average to be as low as possible so you can feel good about yourselves. Fact is, 8 X 6.5 is pretty common, you'll just have to live with it.

Why so surprised when no study has ever reached that conclusion?

And the idea that "8 x 6.5 is pretty common" is actually patently ridiculous.

 

[Snakebyte]

Can you cite another study with a drug induced erection and measured by staff? I only know Wessels.

Actually most of the studies did. For example Schneider. Just take the Veale meta analysis and take a look at all the studies yourself

The "functional length" as they called it was 6.2". That's what they mean by bone pressed.

I find it amazing that people are in denial that the average cock is a bit over 6" erect depending on the measuring technique. You just desperately need the average to be as low as possible so you can feel good about yourselves. Fact is, 8 X 6.5 is pretty common, you'll just have to live with it.

No, people are annoyed that you take one single study to make a claim while ALL other studies contradict that claim.
8x6.5 are so common that only a hand full of members could actually provide a 8" measurement. But now it's clear that you are not interested in facts.

 

[grandunification]

Why so surprised when no study has ever reached that conclusion?

And the idea that "8 x 6.5 is pretty common" is actually patently ridiculous.

By common, I meant about 1 per 100. Not what you'd expect, but if you go into a grocery store with 100 guys, there's a good chance someone is packing that much. It's common enough that you'll come across one just by walking outside.

 

[johanlo]

What about this one? https://i.redd.it/ya7kbekahtt31.png

Post again? Link down

 

[johanlo]

https://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/2922431/

8 inches soft. Almost 11 inches rock hard.

https://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/2922441/

Is that you holding the dick? If so, measure it hard and show us

 

[Shepardson]

By common, I meant about 1 per 100.

Which dick study came up with an 8x6.5 guy? That's roughly John Holmes' length and Shane Diesel's girth.

 

[grandunification]

Which dick study came up with an 8x6.5 guy? That's roughly John Holmes' length and Shane Diesel's girth.[/QUOTE
All the s

Which dick study came up with an 8x6.5 guy? That's roughly John Holmes' length and Shane Diesel's girth.

All the studies that list their max size are finding 8 X 6 cocks or even bigger out of 100 men.

 

[upright_member]

If no one fronts up with a 'tenner' has there been a contender for runner-up?

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

The "functional length" as they called it was 6.2". That's what they mean by bone pressed.

I find it amazing that people are in denial that the average cock is a bit over 6" erect depending on the measuring technique. You just desperately need the average to be as low as possible so you can feel good about yourselves. Fact is, 8 X 6.5 is pretty common, you'll just have to live with it.

Where is "functional length" even mentioned? Where is "6.2 inches" mentioned? Provide links and the exact passages mentioning this. I did your work for you by linking to two abstracts of Wessels. You haven't shown anything at all to support your 6.2" assertion, let alone this new term, "functional length".

It isn't even logical for bone-pressed to be called "functional length". But I can be convinced...link to an actual site that has Wessels showing both that term and a 6.2" mean.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

All the studies that list their max size are finding 8 X 6 cocks or even bigger out of 100 men.

Links to those studies?

 

[Shepardson]

Links to those studies?

Yeah, I'm not into this enough to go dig things up, but one in a hundred being 8x6 sounds sort of screwed up if it isn't self reported.

 

[Snakebyte]

All the studies that list their max size are finding 8 X 6 cocks or even bigger out of 100 men.

And again not true at all. There are plenty of studies that found like 17-19cm max. This is getting boring since it's obvious you didn't read lots of studies.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

Yeah, I'm not into this enough to go dig things up, but one in a hundred being 8x6 sounds sort of screwed up if it isn't self reported.

I've never seen a size study that reported both length and girth together for a study subject. And there is not one shred of evidence from Wessels showing 6.2" as median.

But again, I'm gIving this guy time to provide actual data we can see.

Not that it gets anyone any closer to the prize.

 

[Khegan]

Maybe they took their "random" sample from a horseman's club or some other big dick society meeting, LOL

 

[Nothin-on-me73]

The "functional length" as they called it was 6.2". That's what they mean by bone pressed.

I find it amazing that people are in denial that the average cock is a bit over 6" erect depending on the measuring technique. You just desperately need the average to be as low as possible so you can feel good about yourselves. Fact is, 8 X 6.5 is pretty common, you'll just have to live with it.

 

[grandunification]

Comparisons with statistics is only meaningful if one measures in the same way as gathered in the statistics. Different studies have measured differently, but here is a video with a demonstration on flaccid measurements.

 

[INCUBUS]

Is pretty much how I feel about the past few pages. Study says this! Study says that! Study still has not shown any proof of a legitimate 10" dick to claim $10,000.00!

 

[INCUBUS]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjADegQIBBAD&usg=AOvVaw002khqSeMQlKtsLoQaDHmX

Now IF you wanna see some real 9, 10s & up!?!?! Check out this site!

Figured since we're on a derailment binge. Might as well throw in my .02 cents