The $10,000 10-inch challenge

[Snakebyte]

Comparisons with statistics is only meaningful if one measures in the same way as gathered in the statistics. Different studies have measured differently, but here is a video with a demonstration on flaccid measurements.

Plenty of studies used exactly the same methods. But it's funny that you keep ignoring any post that contradicts your agenda.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

Comparisons with statistics is only meaningful if one measures in the same way as gathered in the statistics. Different studies have measured differently, but here is a video with a demonstration on flaccid measurements.

Still doesn't show Wessels stating a 6.2" average.

But thanks for trying to divert attention from that diversion from the actual thread topic.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjADegQIBBAD&usg=AOvVaw002khqSeMQlKtsLoQaDHmX

Now IF you wanna see some real 9, 10s & up!?!?! Check out this site!

Figured since we're on a derailment binge. Might as well throw in my .02 cents

So, so much Photoshop.

And.......

A Quercusone sighting!!!!

 

[creek47]

And it just keeps going

 

[TinyPrincess]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjADegQIBBAD&usg=AOvVaw002khqSeMQlKtsLoQaDHmX

Now IF you wanna see some real 9, 10s & up!?!?! Check out this site!

Figured since we're on a derailment binge. Might as well throw in my .02 cents

My favourite is the black dick half way through - 8" girth apparently - but also under 2" in diameter....

Oh, the tape has to be tightened... My bad

 

[Bourbon34f]

Not looking to cite any specific study, but in my casual perusing of the data I’ve looked at, 8X6 is more like 1:1,000... not 1:100. And 10X”anything” is non existent... which is pretty much what TP has said all along.

Just sayin...

Cheers.

 

[Nothin-on-me73]

sorry. typo. on. that. ,. pharmacuetically induced. erection ? from what. iv. read. its. a drug combination called. trimix , the main drug being the opiate derivative papavarine. ?

 

[INCUBUS]

sorry. typo. on. that. ,. pharmacuetically induced. erection ? from what. iv. read. its. a drug combination called. trimix , the main drug being the opiate derivative papavarine. ?

And your post is relevant to the Topic how?

 

[MrHUGE1n]

11" extender
View attachment Snapchat-2051660548.mp4

 

[Clod]

Not looking to cite any specific study, but in my casual perusing of the data I’ve looked at, 8X6 is more like 1:1,000... not 1:100. And 10X”anything” is non existent... which is pretty much what TP has said all along.

Just sayin...

Cheers.

8x6 nbp is probably rarer than that. Check out the 8” thread.

 

[Nothin-on-me73]

View attachment 8201781
And your post is relevant to the Topic how?

it was relevant to dick size surveys . I dont know how it would be reliable to a survey , from what iv. read it doesnt necesarilly maximize an erection for every guy that uses trimix .

 

[IntactMale]

The thread isn't about surveys and averages. It's about at least one individual who can provide proof of a 10 inch penis according to the terms of the thread.

I'm also not sure if taking a drug that could potentially push your body beyond its natural capacity would fall within the guidelines. It's not my decision, but it seems like that would be similar to pumping your penis before measuring it, or stuffing it into a contraption that stretches it.

 

[Mr. Show the Bulge]

Jonah Falcon? The only actual evidence of his size is a video of him masturbating. When he managed to get hard, he was at best 8 inches. He has an unusually long foreskin. But that ain't dick. And it ain't 13.5 inches as he claims.

So going by this, you have seen guys who were all well under 8 inches.

And if you want to mock people by calling them "penis size police", by all means show us where and how an opinion has been wrong. This thread SEEKS a ten inch penis. But it needs to actually be a penis, and ten inches.

You're absolutely right about Jonah Falcon not being 13 inches hard. I saw that masturbation video, too, and estimated his erection to be about 9 inches. Jonah Falcon has a huge flaccid penis. That he has, and he has big balls, too, creating a huge bulge. For the rest, however, he's a big fraud.

I can't understand how he can come on TV and lie about his size simply to get attention. He needs help and lots of it.

 

[Excelsus]

I saw that masturbation video, too, and estimated his erection to be about 9 inches. Jonah Falcon has a huge flaccid penis. That he has, and he has big balls, too, creating a huge bulge. For the rest, however, he's a big fraud.

This video?

I can't see anything huge there. neither flaccid nor errect. He's slightly above average. Maybe 7.5 at best.

 

[Mr. Show the Bulge]

This video?

I can't see anything huge there. neither flaccid nor errect. He's slightly above average. Maybe 7.5 at best.

Yes, that video. Yeah, his erection is probably between 7.5 - 9 inches. It's hard to say exactly. What isn't hard to say, though, is that he's nowhere near his alleged 13 inches.

 

[fordonfire]

Yeah, I'm not into this enough to go dig things up, but one in a hundred being 8x6 sounds sort of screwed up if it isn't self reported.

The truth is even most of the well controlled studies (not self reported like Wessells) will still suffer from selection bias. Its very difficult to bring in participants without them having any idea that a researcher is going to make them get hard and get measured, it's too unusual a situation to just surprise someone with... Typically the men are going to be aware of it and the larger guys are more likely to show up and the smaller ones more likely to not participate at all.

 

[Mr. Show the Bulge]

The truth is even most of the well controlled studies (not self reported like Wessells) will still suffer from selection bias. Its very difficult to bring in participants without them having any idea that a researcher is going to make them get hard and get measured, it's too unusual a situation to just surprise someone with... Typically the men are going to be aware of it and the larger guys are more likely to show up and the smaller ones more likely to not participate at all.

I believe what you're saying is right.

 

[Nexolaris]

The truth is even most of the well controlled studies (not self reported like Wessells) will still suffer from selection bias. Its very difficult to bring in participants without them having any idea that a researcher is going to make them get hard and get measured, it's too unusual a situation to just surprise someone with... Typically the men are going to be aware of it and the larger guys are more likely to show up and the smaller ones more likely to not participate at all.

There are some studies done during military recruitments. I'd guess those guys didn't really have a choice. So those studies should be pretty good indicators of average sizes even when they only measured stretched flaccid length.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

The truth is even most of the well controlled studies (not self reported like Wessells) will still suffer from selection bias. Its very difficult to bring in participants without them having any idea that a researcher is going to make them get hard and get measured, it's too unusual a situation to just surprise someone with... Typically the men are going to be aware of it and the larger guys are more likely to show up and the smaller ones more likely to not participate at all.

Wessels was not self-reported. If it was, then BJUI would not have included it in their meta-. A criteria of the meta-analysis was measurement by a clinician.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

There are some studies done during military recruitments. I'd guess those guys didn't really have a choice. So those studies should be pretty good indicators of average sizes even when they only measured stretched flaccid length.

Yes, and others are included in other medical procedures. Subjects are simply asked to participate while in hospital for for example prostatectomy. This is partly why many utilized flaccid stretched measurements, as it has no requirement for erection, and correlates closely with erect size. Few studies actually invite subjects, and many of them, such as M&J, result in peer rejection for poor methodology.