The $10,000 10-inch challenge

I believe it is the only study specifying bone pressed. Also, the lifestyle study found an average of 5.9" and it was non bone pressed. Who knows what they would have found were it bone pressed, maybe close to 7".

Why would you link the "source" and then discredit the findings by saying that "maybe its even bigger?" I agree that your source is probably in accurate since its just some guy talking on a forum dedicated to surgical penis enlargement, but I think your making exceptions in the wrong direction.

Next time you don't have faith in the data you might as well not present it.
 
I'm aware of someone above 10 but sadly he doesn't use this site.
 
She's 5'3", 110lbs, according to her modelmayhem profile. Tiny partners are most popular in "big dick" porn, particularly interracial fetish productions, as the illusion (good vs bad, thug vs willing victim, black vs white) is more enhanced by little hands & mouths.

Also, his belt is 2" wide. Now look at the dick. I'll agree with the earlier 8-ish estimate. That's a huge fucking ween, but still no measured, or even credible, 10 incher has been posted here for the $$.

00000142.jpg
 
I'm aware of someone above 10 but sadly he doesn't use this site.
He doesn't need to use the site. Just ask him for a pic for proof. You both get the 10K as theres a finders fee
 
I believe it is the only study specifying bone pressed. Also, the lifestyle study found an average of 5.9" and it was non bone pressed. Who knows what they would have found were it bone pressed, maybe close to 7".
What are you even talking about? There are dozens of studies out there. Quite a few measured BP. Do your research the next time. Besides that 80 subjects isn't enough by far. That's why you should rely on a meta analysis since you'd need 10.000 subjects for reliable data if you wanna talk about the whole male population word wide. You should know that if you know a bit about statistics.
 
What are you even talking about? There are dozens of studies out there. Quite a few measured BP. Do your research the next time. Besides that 80 subjects isn't enough by far. That's why you should rely on a meta analysis since you'd need 10.000 subjects for reliable data if you wanna talk about the whole male population word wide. You should know that if you know a bit about statistics.

I actually do agree with you. It would be nice if there was a random study with 10,000 staff measured pharmacologically induced erections, but as far as I know, in the history of the world, only the 80 men in the Wessels study have ever been measured that way. That's all I can go on. Also, the lifestyle study was reportedly non bone pressed, and consisted of 300 men, not bad. The average was 5.9".
 
but as far as I know, in the history of the world, only the 80 men in the Wessels study have ever been measured that way.
Well, that's not true though at all. No clue how many studies you actually read but there is way more out there than Wessels and Lifestyles. And they are pretty much consistent with 5.0-5.2" nbpel and about 5.7" bp average.
And sorry but Lifestyles is a big controversy. Not reliable unless you can find the original data by Ansell. Besides, the selection of subjects was kinda biased in this one due to the way this was done. I'd rather rely on real scientifical studies published in high class journals.
 
Well, that's not true though at all. No clue how many studies you actually read but there is way more out there than Wessels and Lifestyles. And they are pretty much consistent with 5.0-5.2" nbpel and about 5.7" bp average.
And sorry but Lifestyles is a big controversy. Not reliable unless you can find the original data by Ansell. Besides, the selection of subjects was kinda biased in this one due to the way this was done. I'd rather rely on real scientifical studies published in high class journals.

Can you cite another study with a drug induced erection and measured by staff? I only know Wessels.
 
Last edited: