The $10,000 10-inch challenge

[Darwinsurvival]

I'm not sure what you think you are proving with that study, because there is no rhyme or reason to the tiny differences you find in the subgroup analysis section. The size ranges a bit between region, but not congruent with the stereotypes you are conveying in this thread. And the confidence intervals overlap for every group except Asian, and there is no indication about whether perhaps the Asian analysis is populated with more studies of a urology treatment nature (which are the lowest category of all for obvious reasons: these men are getting measured because they have a medical problem with their penises). So the low Asian result could potentially be completely explained away by a confounding variable, and there is no other evidence in the study to suggest that racial stereotypes are true.

Sure, there are overlaps, but that doesn't mean there aren't significant differences.

Are you a creationist ?

Evolution acts on different populations.

For example, there are differences in blood types... We can also find differences in penises.

Nature doesn't care what you think.

The evolution of species has no morality or purpose.

 

[Darwinsurvival]

According to that study, erect penile length has increased by 24% within a few decades. That can hardly be explained by evolution.

Evolution can affect very small periods.

But it may also be that the old data was not correct.

 

[Darwinsurvival]

And it's not a negative thing.

I love big black dick.

 

[theogman]

Sure, there are overlaps, but that doesn't mean there aren't significant differences.

Are you a creationist ?

Evolution acts on different populations.

For example, there are differences in blood types... We can also find differences in penises.

Nature doesn't care what you think.

The evolution of species has no morality or purpose.

Evolution can affect very small periods.

But it may also be that the old data was not correct.

The study says 24% in 29 years. That would be one generation. Again, that can not be explaines by evolution.
It may also be that the new data is not correct. Or that the study is missing something.

 

[romanbellic]

Size estimate on this?

 

[kahlua123]

Size estimate on this?

A thin 7.5-8.5 inches on a small man. Needs a ruler to qualify here, anyway.

 

[TinyPrincess]

According to that study, erect penile length has increased by 24% within a few decades. That can hardly be explained by evolution.

Nutrition is Darwins middle name...

 

[PRPC75]

Must be close ?

 

[SubbySlutForBigDick]

Must be close ?

Camera angles make him look bigger

 

[flynn]

Must be close ?

It looks like he is three hands long. Assume a man's hand is 3" minimum across the knuckles, I would say he is 9" long.

 

[BillDunn]

The problem with trying to pin down length based on videos like this is that there is no measurement.

Now, that said, he does look longer than average in that there is a tendency for penises to grow more in length than in girth as they grow larger than average. So, it has that "long" look. The rest can be an illusion of the relative size of the man it's attached to.

For example, the width of the man's hips might be rather small, so his dick looks bigger in relation to the other things we see on the camera, and we perceive more absolute size than there might really be. The general size of a man's skeleton can vary a great deal, just like penises. So, a man 5'7" man, with narrow hips and low bodyfat with an 8" x 5" that could 'look' even bigger than it is.

Now granted, a legit nbp 8" is much more than average, but it is simply impossible to say if it is that big, or even bigger than that. Everything else in the footage is of unknown size, and the camera is in the most generous position.

That is why for purposes of this contest, there are very specific rules listed on the opening post on page 1, including exactly how it must be measured.

1. Hard ruler/ not a tape measure
2. On top of penis/ not to the side or under it or anything else
3. Penis Must be erect/ not stretched flaccid and neither inside of a pump tube
4. Man must be standing/ not laying down or sitting
5. Penis must be horizontal/ not pointing downward
6. 0 must be visible on the ruler/ non-bone-pressed

 

[Shepardson]

For example, the width of the man's hips might be rather small, so his dick looks bigger in relation to the other things we see on the camera, and we perceive more absolute size than there might really be. The general size of a man's skeleton can vary a great deal, just like penises. So, a man 5'7" man, with narrow hips and low bodyfat with an 8" x 5" that could 'look' even bigger than it is.

Now granted, a legit nbp 8" is much more than average, but it is simply impossible to say if it is that big, or even bigger than that. Everything else in the footage is of unknown size, and the camera is in the most generous position.

Good points. That cropping has a similar effect on body size too, which is why you always see solo dick videos in a narrow strip across the waist or pictures chopped down to nothing but the dick. More non-dick skin or visible body parts = lower dick to body ratio = less impressive. It's especially effective with certain dick shapes and narrow frames as you pointed out.

He does look longer than most of the long dick show-off videos considering they're often much more cheesy with the tricks or lens distortion. If there was any hint of a left forearm tattoo, I'd swear it was Danny D with that shape, body and foreskin, but one of the effects of those lenses is that they expand anything toward the foreground, and he maintains that 45° angle the whole time, so he may not actually have that larger front end.

PS- Hope he didn't nut on that nice, clean couch.

 

[VIIby5]

Camera angles make him look bigger

Yep. He's probably Just slightly bigger than average .

 

[Shepardson]

Yep. He's probably Just slightly bigger than average .

Not sure if that was sarcastic, but I can't see that being the case unless he had a freakishly petite body like that kid way back with the angled video, where we eventually realized that he was eye-level with the light switch.

 

[dickapick]

Not sure if that was sarcastic, but I can't see that being the case unless he had a freakishly petite body like that kid way back with the angled video, where we eventually realized that he was eye-level with the light switch.

I am afraid not. He is one of those people that thinks 7 inches is below average. If you believe so, 8 inches will automatically be just slightly bigger than average ..

To get this slightly back on topic. @VIIby5 can you explain the lack of 10 inch penises in this thread, when people only have to be 2.5 inches longer than what you claim is average?

 

[Evenflow618]

Everybody has to accept 10 inches doesn’t exist

 

[Snakebyte]

Everybody has to accept 10 inches doesn’t exist

No, that's a claim just as stupid as when people claim they had several of them.

 

[Evenflow618]

How is it stupid if we have 815 pages with no proof and there is a porn industry that would have documented it already

No, that's a claim just as stupid as when people claim they had several of them.

 

[dickapick]

How is it stupid if we have 815 pages with no proof and there is a porn industry that would have documented it already

The porn industry documented way more than a lousy 10 inches. Claims of 13 inches and more are not uncommon. But they are not very trustworthy.

This thread only proves that there are a lot less than people claim there are.

 

[Clod]

The porn industry documented way more than a lousy 10 inches. Claims of 13 inches and more are not uncommon. But they are not very trustworthy.

This thread only proves that there are a lot less than people claim there are.

I don't disagree that 10 inches "could" exist, but you're being a bit too charitable here. This thread proves there are zero legit provable 10 inchers to be found on the entire internet so far after over 6 years of extensive searching. In a world where "13 inches and more are not uncommon", ZERO dicks at all being 10 inches seems REALLY undersold by "a lot less than people claim there are". There are presumably also a lot less Bigfoots, Loch Ness monsters, & chupacabras than people claim there are. Still, even then, WAY more people believe in 10 inch cocks than Bigfoot...