Unsimulated sex scenes in a movie

Does anyone know why in the 70-early 2000's there were a lot more unsimulated sex scenes in porn as opposed to now? I mean, some of the hottest I've seen were from the 80's (of course the quality wasn't the best) but now with 4K resolution and stuff why aren't producers doing these movies anymore? Is society just too sensitive now?
 
erections from both male leads in "together alone"
Has anyone ever come across the 7 minute preview of this movie that was posted on Vimeo by the director some time ago? It supposedly had more explicit/unsimulated stuff in it than what is currently available, but he deleted it a long time ago and I haven't been able to find it anywhere yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vg122da and kev2001
Actually there is a cumshot in Public Eye
Well not in the vid posted here lol. The only one was through the lens of like a cam show which they could of literally taken any cam guys cumshot ever and added that in there since there's no face.
 
Does anyone know why in the 70-early 2000's there were a lot more unsimulated sex scenes in porn as opposed to now? I mean, some of the hottest I've seen were from the 80's (of course the quality wasn't the best) but now with 4K resolution and stuff why aren't producers doing these movies anymore? Is society just too sensitive now?

Firstly you're talking about a massive period of time there of 30+years. The 70's saw more of an explosion of these types of films became more common due to relaxed attitudes to sex from the 60's. Then it was uncommon from the late 70s til the late 90s.

Lars von Trier is credited with helping begin a new surge of 'arthouse' films that had unsimulated sex in them which led to all the films we'd have heard of in the early- mid noughties (Shortbus, All About Anna, Sindrome, Antares, 9 songs, Brown Bunny, Ken Park, Intimacy, Baise Moi etc)

I believe It's a perception issue though as of the 391 films indicated as having 'unsimulated sex' in them on IMDB, 222 of them have been since 2010 and many of these (Sexual Chronicles of a French Family, Stranger by the Lake, Acrobat, Love, DAU, Siempre Si and more) have gained prominence and have been posted regularly in this thread.

Bearing in mind these films probably don't make much money as they are commercially difficult to sell and COVID will have hampered production for 3 years, it seems the production of these films is as abundant as it has been.
 
Does anyone know why in the 70-early 2000's there were a lot more unsimulated sex scenes in porn as opposed to now? I mean, some of the hottest I've seen were from the 80's (of course the quality wasn't the best) but now with 4K resolution and stuff why aren't producers doing these movies anymore? Is society just too sensitive now?
I'm completely guessing here, but I suspect much of it has to do with such easy access to porn now. It used to be those scenes were very hot (still are), but now longer and close-ups and etc are readily available?
 
Firstly you're talking about a massive period of time there of 30+years. The 70's saw more of an explosion of these types of films became more common due to relaxed attitudes to sex from the 60's. Then it was uncommon from the late 70s til the late 90s.

Lars von Trier is credited with helping begin a new surge of 'arthouse' films that had unsimulated sex in them which led to all the films we'd have heard of in the early- mid noughties (Shortbus, All About Anna, Sindrome, Antares, 9 songs, Brown Bunny, Ken Park, Intimacy, Baise Moi etc)

I believe It's a perception issue though as of the 391 films indicated as having 'unsimulated sex' in them on IMDB, 222 of them have been since 2010 and many of these (Sexual Chronicles of a French Family, Stranger by the Lake, Acrobat, Love, DAU, Siempre Si and more) have gained prominence and have been posted regularly in this thread.

Bearing in mind these films probably don't make much money as they are commercially difficult to sell and COVID will have hampered production for 3 years, it seems the production of these films is as abundant as it has been.

I'm completely guessing here, but I suspect much of it has to do with such easy access to porn now. It used to be those scenes were very hot (still are), but now longer and close-ups and etc are readily available?

Good points. Completely forgot about Lars. Also, sorry in my initial post I said "porn" I meant movies.. but I guess you both got the gist lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kev2001
Good points. Completely forgot about Lars. Also, sorry in my initial post I said "porn" I meant movies.. but I guess you both got the gist lol.
I think there are several reasons for this.

One, most of these scenes have used body doubles and that's been done enough times it's become obvious. When the face and cock are never in the same shot, and it cuts between them when a pan or longer shot would have worked better that's a good sign it was a double.

Also, there's the existence of this thread and X videos and the like. 20 years ago doing an explicit scene meant it would be seen by the audience for that film, in context and in character. Now any actor doing a scene like this has to know it's going to end up on porn sites and seen by people who are never going to see the whole film.