White Boys aren't as small as people think

[whosthatman116]

Fantastic, no one is debating the existence of 9 inch penises. There is clear, obvious visual evidence of that size that exists. "10 inches" (bone-pressed or non-bone-pressed), however, which the user in question is claiming cannot be classified in that same category, because no authentic evidence of that size exists. (Your own hilariously photoshopped photos you're always linking on the forum don't count BTW).



For making a claim. If you do not want to be scrutinized, then don't make unrealistic claims, then fail to back them up. How do you not understand that?

I make the claim that this is my cock. If you claim "foul" or photoshop, or it's someone else's picture then prove it..[/QUOTE]

Hah! Forget those photos. All one has to do is peruse through your joke of a gallery and see there's foul play going on.

In one photo, there's a bunch of completely unnatural rings around your shaft which are present in no other photo.

In the photo where your penis is hanging out of your blue jeans with your belt undone, there's a mole/birthmark on the upper left side (your left) of the shaft. In all the other photos, it is blatantly missing.

If you want, I could get into a discussion further with some other people here who analyze photos and we could depict and point out evidence of foul play in all (or nearly all) of your photos.

Fucking amateur.

 

[scanlan]

And every time I post it, I am right. Ho hum...

Not right, but you are a narcissist.

 

[bush11]

Not right, but you are a narcissist.

I agree only some black guys are massive my friends black he's smaller than me

 

[whosthatman116]

Not right, but you are a narcissist.

No...no. I'm right. Please see above post.

 

[scanlan]

I make the claim that this is my cock. If you claim "foul" or photoshop, or it's someone else's picture then prove it..

Hah! Forget those photos. All one has to do is peruse through your joke of a gallery and see there's foul play going on.

In one photo, there's a bunch of completely unnatural rings around your shaft which are present in no other photo.

In the photo where your penis is hanging out of your blue jeans with your belt undone, there's a mole/birthmark on the upper left side (your left) of the shaft. In all the other photos, it is blatantly missing.

If you want, I could get into a discussion further with some other people here who analyze photos and we could depict and point out evidence of foul play in all (or nearly all) of your photos.

Fucking amateur.[/QUOTE]


Why not start with the 2 I posted above? The rings are, as I explained, because it was crammed in my underwear all day. I don't know about the birthmark maybe it was a bruise or something. Please don't re-post any of the pictures in my gallery here, because that was tried before but the member got caught adding things trying to discredit me. He hasn't made a peep since then.

 

[scanlan]

No...no. I'm right. Please see above post.

Narcissists are always right...in their own mind.

 

[whosthatman116]

Narcissists are always right...in their own mind.

Maybe, but there's no doubt my post that just exposed you is wrong. Would you like to acknowledge that? Hmm?

 

[whosthatman116]

Maybe, but there's no doubt my post that just exposed you is wrong. Would you like to acknowledge that? Hmm?

*right

 

[scanlan]

What in the world are you talking about?

 

[whosthatman116]

Hah! Forget those photos. All one has to do is peruse through your joke of a gallery and see there's foul play going on.

In one photo, there's a bunch of completely unnatural rings around your shaft which are present in no other photo.

In the photo where your penis is hanging out of your blue jeans with your belt undone, there's a mole/birthmark on the upper left side (your left) of the shaft. In all the other photos, it is blatantly missing.

If you want, I could get into a discussion further with some other people here who analyze photos and we could depict and point out evidence of foul play in all (or nearly all) of your photos.

Fucking amateur.

Why not start with the 2 I posted above? The rings are, as I explained, because it was crammed in my underwear all day. I don't know about the birthmark maybe it was a bruise or something. Please don't re-post any of the pictures in my gallery here, because that was tried before but the member got caught adding things trying to discredit me. He hasn't made a peep since then.[/QUOTE]

Wow.

LAMEST excuses hahahahah!

Just come clean.

 

[scanlan]

Hah! Forget those photos. All one has to do is peruse through your joke of a gallery and see there's foul play going on.

In one photo, there's a bunch of completely unnatural rings around your shaft which are present in no other photo.

In the photo where your penis is hanging out of your blue jeans with your belt undone, there's a mole/birthmark on the upper left side (your left) of the shaft. In all the other photos, it is blatantly missing.

If you want, I could get into a discussion further with some other people here who analyze photos and we could depict and point out evidence of foul play in all (or nearly all) of your photos.

I'm a moron.

Bring in the experts and analyze away..

 

[whosthatman116]

What in the world are you talking about?

That your photos are altered. Is your brain altered as well? Is that why you can't follow what I'm saying?

Your photos are fraudulent. End of story. Your lame ass excuses are ridiculous and any remotely knowledgable person can see that.

 

[whosthatman116]

Bring in the experts and analyze away..

Your photos are altered, I JUST pointed out 2 glaring flaws without even trying. Every single non-bulge photo in your gallery looks hilariously fabricated.

 

[scanlan]

Your photos are altered, I JUST pointed out 2 glaring flaws without even trying. Every single non-bulge photo in your gallery looks hilariously fabricated.

Did you even read my explanation? The rings are from being packed in my underwear all day (I explained that in the caption) and the so-called birthmark might have been a bruise or something..I really don't know. Why would I add rings and a birthmark if that's even possible? You are making no sense at all.

 

[whosthatman116]

Did you even read my explanation? The rings are from being packed in my underwear all day (I explained that in the caption) and the so-called birthmark might have been a bruise or something..I really don't know. Why would I add rings and a birthmark if that's even possible? You are making no sense at all.

Nobody's penis would look like that even if it was "packed away". They're completely and utterly unnatural looking and I'm guessing that caption was a preemptive defence mechanism to discourage people from calling out your bullshit.

As far as the mole goes. That's obviously a mole. I mean, I don't know what else to say. If you think that's a bruise, or some temporary mark or something, all I can say is you're completely defiant in admitting your forgery, legally blind, or insane. My guess is your just being childishly defiant.

 

[scanlan]

You are deleting posts make you look ridiculous. Like 198 where you state that your post that just exposed me is wrong. Freudian slip maybe?

 

[scanlan]

Nobody's penis would look like that even if it was "packed away". They're completely and utterly unnatural looking and I'm guessing that caption was a preemptive defence mechanism to discourage people from calling out your bullshit.

As far as the mole goes. That's obviously a mole. I mean, I don't know what else to say. If you think that's a bruise, or some temporary mark or something, all I can say is you're completely defiant in admitting your forgery, legally blind, or insane. My guess is your just being childishly defiant.

I'm done here and you are free to think and say whatever you want. Moles and rings mean nothing and prove nothing and I think you know it.

 

[whosthatman116]

Did you even read my explanation? The rings are from being packed in my underwear all day (I explained that in the caption) and the so-called birthmark might have been a bruise or something..I really don't know. Why would I add rings and a birthmark if that's even possible? You are making no sense at all.

You wouldn't "add" rings. They're just a side effect and tell take sign of photo fakery.

And again, lol, you wouldn't "add" a mole, it would just inadvertently get taken out due to tampering with your photos. Any inconsistency like that is about as sure fire a sign as you can get that a photo or photos have been tampered with.

 

[whosthatman116]

You are deleting posts make you look ridiculous. Like 198 where you state that your post that just exposed me is wrong. Freudian slip maybe?

I didn't delete anything? No idea what you're talking about.

 

[whosthatman116]

I'm done here and you are free to think and say whatever you want. Moles and rings mean nothing and prove nothing and I think you know it.

Then what does mean something? Do I have to literally come find you, chop it off and bring it around for everyone to see?

Your photos show multiple tell-take signs of forgery. There's no two ways about it. You can deny it all, but the visual evidence speaks for itself.