Why are they trying to force sexual fluidity onto gay men

[bigboaster]

Just like on this forum, right?

Sure. I mean social media in general. If any porn star has a thread on here, the discussion should be focusing on the content they produce, their prices, business practices and such. I couldn't care less about their personal lives, their sexuality or their personalities. But unfortunately that is where it typically veers into.

 

[006]

You're not less of a gay man because you have sex with women once or twice a year,

Ahh, yes…you are.

 

[2_fresh_2deathhh]

I believe a lot of it is a call to the silent majority. The bisexuals who have always been forced by the gay and straight communities to pick a side.

For too long, some gay and straight people have seen bisexuality as simply a gateway for closeted gay men to come out. This is true, but there is a much bigger number who are actually a shade of bisexual who enjoy both to varying degrees.

These shows are trying to make people aware that bisexuals can have relationships or even just sex with any gender and that it is normal for these people.

It's not erasure of gay identity. It's an acceptance that there are real bisexuals who never really identified as gay.

If someone self identifies and then changes then they erased themselves. Plus why are people identifying before understanding their own desires and wants. Plus bisexual men have always lie and use gay men for money , attention and clout. Cade maddox is one of them who lies about being gay but really is bisexual. Look at his rentmen page.

The real issue is with society not making space for men’s sexuality and that men can sleep and be with whomever.

Well going back in the closet is erasing gay individuals. Kyle connors and rocco reed are examples of men who says they are bi/straight then turn anti-gay even though they were doing drugs. Their stance for hating gays is stupid.

 

[2_fresh_2deathhh]

I’m not saying they’re right or should be trusted but it was becoming a thing several years ago. “Gay” men craving pussy. Hopefully it’s peaked and we’re coming down the other side back to reality.

Bro its a person NOT CRACK. Again the fact that they are sooooooo unaware about how they sound.

Makes me glad that I dont listen to drug or sex addicts for any type of advice or feedback.

They are not good people to follow unless you want the gonorrhea of the eyes.

If i see them say that they LOSE money.

 

[michael_3165]

Can you define what you mean by "they"?

 

[Nomebear]

I’m not saying they’re right or should be trusted but it was becoming a thing several years ago. “Gay” men craving pussy. Hopefully it’s peaked and we’re coming down the other side back to reality.

Ha! I've craved a lot of things in my life, but pussy will never be on the list.

 

[2_fresh_2deathhh]

Can you define what you mean by "they"?

Who is the subject of the conversation. Are you reading the same forum messages? Can you even read the title of the forum?

 

[michael_3165]

Who is the subject of the conversation. Are you reading the same forum messages? Can you even read the title of the forum?

Yes I can. The OP is using the term like a monolith.

 

[michael_3165]

Well, it's not different, it's the same problem and it's still relevant. Straight or gay, it can still be upsetting to be made to feel like you're not progressive if you're not bisexual (or whatever made-up word they have for bisexual these days).

I'd argue that if one gets upset about how people perceive ones progressiveness, that it one's own issue.

But I simply don't see this in reality. Maybe in some quirky online space but irl I don't think your average person even considers it. At all.

 

[2_fresh_2deathhh]

Yes I can. The OP is using the term like a monolith.

I wasn’t. If you read and comprehend the subject of MY post. You would be able to understand

I'd argue that if one gets upset about how people perceive ones progressiveness, that it one's own issue.

But I simply don't see this in reality. Maybe in some quirky online space but irl I don't think your average person even considers it. At all.

Just cause you don’t see something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or to trivialize someone else’s experience. You are only viewing life from your limited perspective.

Again someone who is black and gay can be discriminated against. You may never have that experience doesn’t mean it isn’t valid or something to discuss. Again your lack of experience is showing.

 

[michael_3165]

I wasn’t. If you read and comprehend the subject of MY post. You would be able to understand

Just cause you don’t see something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or to trivialize someone else’s experience. You are only viewing life from your limited perspective.

Again someone who is black and gay can be discriminated against. You may never have that experience doesn’t mean it isn’t valid or something to discuss. Again your lack of experience is showing.

Why the hostility? When you make big claims my expectation is that there's some widely held evidence. If it's that rare that I've not come across it... well... what can I tell you.