Photos & Videos Yummyzine

If Ignacio does not go full frontal, he does not deserve to be on the cover! Only full frontal guys does deserve cover exposure. I do not understand why they did not decide to put Tommaso Cataldi on the cover, he's so hot!

@Yummy Magazine: It is important that you take your fans' comments into account. Without fans, there is no magazine.
 
I think that Smiggi has more credit in yummy magazine that he should have. He has shot impressive models but I think not because he is talented but just because he has the big machine supporting him. Maybe next time we could see less of him and more of other talented photographers in your main issue @Yummy Magazine ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kev2001
It's weird to me that the magazine still includes models that refuse to go full frontal. Yes, they may be hot but hot guys are literally a dime a dozen and the magazine is about male nudity. You don't want to be nude, you don't get to be in the magazine, there's literally hundreds of guys out there that would take your place.
 
It's weird to me that the magazine still includes models that refuse to go full frontal. Yes, they may be hot but hot guys are literally a dime a dozen and the magazine is about male nudity. You don't want to be nude, you don't get to be in the magazine, there's literally hundreds of guys out there that would take your place.

I disagree, I am fine with no frontal @Yummy Magazine
I rather a proper agency male model with no frontal than onlyfans personality or a non-model showing everything
Sometimes not seeing is the allure and the mystery!
 
I disagree, I am fine with no frontal @Yummy Magazine
I rather a proper agency male model with no frontal than onlyfans personality or a non-model showing everything
Sometimes not seeing is the allure and the mystery!
So you want "mystery" in a nude magazine? Ok.

Also what makes an "agency" male better than an onlyfans model? You got something against sex workers? Onlyfans guys usually have better bodies than those emaciated fashion models.
 
The allure or mystery can certainly add appeal to a model. However, there are more magazines that provide those kinds of aesthetics. In the context of Yummy Magazine, they have established itself as a brand that provides male nudity, then it could be agreed upon that consistency in providing those content could be beneficial for maintaining its distinct identity as a publishing company.

And what I mean is, it doesn't necessarily focus on explicit pornography towards its models, instead they can focus more on having an artistic approach to nude male photography.

I think they should stick to it because it sets them apart from other magazines and appeals to a specific audience that may be looking for that type of content. By being consistent in their approach, they can establish themselves as a go-to source for that particular type of content and attract a dedicated following of readers.
 
It's weird to me that the magazine still includes models that refuse to go full frontal.
Yummy is a flatform who celebrate the male body, not (just) the male penis. It already delivered some of the best sensual male imagery of recent years, including big name models. If you only crave a sausage cocktail, you are more than welcome to subscribe to Onlyfans, and enjoy full frontal nudity as much as you like.