no issues; super comfortable
yeah how old are you 70?no issues; super comfortable
I would seriously just ignore Miky****’s posts - he’s not worth the effort.Last Sunday you wrote:
"how is it all messed up?? in the 20 30 40 50 60 boys and guys had to get naked to go swimming"
You said nothing about the YMCA at the time, and I can tell you as a kid in the 60's at the Y that no one swam naked. Now, I believe they did further back as there seems to be evidence of that.
But since you didn't mention the YMCA specifically but only said "in the 20 30 40 50 60 boys and guys had to get naked to go swimming" I thought you meant generally speaking men swam naked, which was the case, perhaps, in West Virginia rivers or whatever but not in general; say, at public pools etc. It was a matter of specificity and clarification. THAT's what I "thought you were trying to say."
hahaha your funny welcome to ignore what are you straight or gayI would seriously just ignore Miky****’s posts - he’s not worth the effort.
no they just got normalAmerican locker rooms used to be like this. Then all the younger guys got all pussified and started doing towel dances, etc.
They got "normal"??no they just got normal
I think circumcision has made American men ashamed. The older generations weren’t cut and loved to show off.American locker rooms used to be like this. Then all the younger guys got all pussified and started doing towel dances, etc.
the older generation didnt knowI think circumcision has made American men ashamed. The older generations weren’t cut and loved to show off.
I don't see how this is even close to accurate. We were never ashamed of being cut. In fact, where I grew up, I never saw an uncut cock in the locker room until college. there was no question of "shame."I think circumcision has made American men ashamed. The older generations weren’t cut and loved to show off.
They weren’t ashamed of their bodies, the way cultures that routinely circ are. Most cultures where people are comfortable changing in front of others are ones that don’t cut outside of rare medical issues. The ones that do cut are very prudish, like the USS, Islamic cultures, African cultures, etc.the older generation didnt know
Cultures that tend to be very prudish and the men are rushing to cover their penises tend to be nations with very high circ rates, like the Islamic nations or the USA. The nations where men just let it hang tend to not cut outside of rare medical issues, that’s just what I observed myself.I don't see how this is even close to accurate. We were never ashamed of being cut. In fact, where I grew up, I never saw an uncut cock in the locker room until college. there was no question of "shame."
I think circumcision has made American men ashamed. The older generations weren’t cut and loved to show off.
This is a very far-fetched theory. American men were not "rushing to cover their penises" in the 20th century. I saw little of that and I have been in locker rooms for decades. If anything, it was the uncut guys who were modest.Cultures that tend to be very prudish and the men are rushing to cover their penises tend to be nations with very high circ rates, like the Islamic nations or the USA. The nations where men just let it hang tend to not cut outside of rare medical issues, that’s just what I observed myself.
Then why are they always so quick to cover?absurd.
Uncut guys in the USA are modest because we live in a culture that sadly demonizes them for not having their body altered, STRANGE!This is a very far-fetched theory. American men were not "rushing to cover their penises" in the 20th century. I saw little of that and I have been in locker rooms for decades. If anything, it was the uncut guys who were modest.
Maybe they are uncomfortable with you staring at their dicks all of the time.Then why are they always so quick to cover?