AssMan1972
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2022
- Posts
- 67
- Media
- 17
- Likes
- 396
- Points
- 63
- Age
- 52
- Location
- Tampa, Florida,United States
- Sexuality
- 80% Straight, 20% Gay
- Gender
- Male
How many men are actually bisexual?
- Thread starter StrenghtenMe
- Start date
Easily over half of men would and have played with another man's cock.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
- Posts
- 22,606
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 121,047
- Points
- 458
- Location
- Saint Lucia
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- Pansexual
- Gender
- Male
- Joined
- May 26, 2011
- Posts
- 3,011
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 4,167
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Birmingham, AL, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
That's the kind of fantasy-driven assertion that I expect from most men here at LPSG, denying all data and casual observation to the contrary, while adhering to a false narrative and attacking those who dare speak the blasphemous truth, making it all akin to a religious belief in its dogma.
Actually, that statistic seems a bit random to me. I mean, I can't say I've had many experiences, but "over half of men" seems a bit surreal, don't you think?I could be wrong, tho
Depends on how truly they are at responding to the question and their age. OMG, in my twenties, I took offense at bi guys but I got older.
Because it is not a "statistic" but an assertion plucked out of thin air, masquerading as a data-based statement, but only belying a hopeful fantasy that even similar optimists do not buy. It's not just "a bit random," it's completely fabricated.
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
- Posts
- 124
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 214
- Points
- 188
- Location
- Columbus (Ohio, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
- Joined
- May 31, 2018
- Posts
- 3,841
- Media
- 46
- Likes
- 13,732
- Points
- 433
- Location
- Los Angeles, California, US
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 69% Straight, 31% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I just had to come back to this labeling thing...
There are a number of guys in my area on Sniffies that list themselves as "straight curious". Then we have the "oral tops" or "oral bottoms" (give or receive head only). So this labeling thing is a waste of time.
There are a number of guys in my area on Sniffies that list themselves as "straight curious". Then we have the "oral tops" or "oral bottoms" (give or receive head only). So this labeling thing is a waste of time.
These days people are identifying as all kinds of things, like dogs, cats, whatever, and that’s accepted. But somehow a man can’t identify as straight if he occasionally has sex with another man? That’s a double standard. Some of you guys are just such hypocrites. A lot of straight men who criticize this have probably done wild fetish stuff themselves. Should that define their identity? I’m gay but I enjoy sleeping with women sometimes. That doesn’t make me bisexual. It’s just fantasy, not identity.
Yeah, seems daft we all have to be a certain label. I have been told I am gay on this site before because I like trans women.
I don't find men sexually attractive at all. I am however very attracted to trans women and do like their cocks and have sucked two but it is definitely femininity that turns me on, I just happen to like both kinds of genitals.
Like I said I don't find men attractive but I am open to and want to try wanking with another guy. So fuck knows what label that makes me!
Also it is fluid, a few years ago I would have thought a woman with a cock was not my thing and it is only a recent thing wanting to experiment with a guy, would have horrified me a few years ago!
So, we need to choose whether to look at sexuality from a scientific or a philosophical perspective
Science, like with everything else, has always given names to things, and I don’t see why that should be condemned. We know that sexuality is a spectrum, so it’s not just 100% homosexual, 100% heterosexual, or 100% bisexual (50/50).
That said, we can't pretend there's no difference between a man who would never even consider the idea of touching a woman, and a man who, while mostly attracted to other men, enjoys sex with women too—simply because he doesn’t want to even consider the remote possibility of being partially bisexual.
It's clear that everyone is free to identify however they want and
I get the idea of wanting to break down labels, but giving something a definition helps make everything clear. That’s why I prefer to look at sexuality from a scientific perspective – it’s the best way to fight ignorance and taboos that lead people to think being gay is a choice or that a parent might hope their gay child will change and become straight.
That’s exactly what I meant. It’s clear that anyone who told you you’re gay or bi just because you’re attracted to trans women is ignorant and doesn’t understand what having a fetish means. I had a similar discussion with some people in a thread because they didn’t want to understand that having a fetish for trans women makes you less straight than other guys, but definitely not enough to be considered bi, since you’d never think about having sex with a man, being only attracted to femininity.
But as you can see, I still gave a definition here.
Then again, who knows? You mentioned wanting to experiment with a guy, so maybe that’ll help you discover other sides of your sexuality in the future.
I just want to clarify one last thing. Denying one's sexuality isn't just about straight men who realize they might not be as straight as they thought—it also applies to gay men. This is because it's not just about social factors; it's also about the fact that discovering a part of yourself you didn’t know about can be hard to accept sometimes.
Bro, you’re ignorant. Let them decide for themselves what they are. Because they like to have a dick once in a while doesn’t mean they are bisexual or gay. Because if that’s the route you want to go. 3/4 of lpsg people fantasizing about daddy and son sex should be considered pedophiles, sexual predators. What you do in bed, sexually, doesn’t define who you are deep down as a human being. Because liking to play dad and son and liking to have a dick in your mouth once a year doesn’t mean shit.
Well, tell it how you want.
Since your reading comprehension is so good, I don’t think it’s worth continuing.
my reading comprehension? next time you use chatgpt to write your so-smart and philosophical paragraph, make sure you tell it not to use dashes 10 times in the paragraph. that way, it will look genuine and well-thought-out. anyone smart can spot a chatgpt response just by the dashes all over the place.
It honestly blows my mind that the gay community spent so many years fighting for the freedom to just be ourselves, and now here we are trying to put other people in boxes and tell them who or what they are. To the straight guys jumping into this thread to argue about whether someone’s straight or bi just because they’ve had experiences with other men, seriously, what are you doing here? Why are you even interested in this conversation if you’re coming from a toxic masculine mindset? And honestly, I’ve never really felt like a proud member of the gay community. In my experience, a lot of the people who are the most vocal or active in it can come off as hypocritical, snobbish, and pretty self-centered. It’s frustrating when the very community that’s supposed to stand for freedom, authenticity, and acceptance ends up being just as judgmental as the world we fought against. At the end of the day, can we please just let people be who they are without constantly trying to label them or police their identity? It’s not our place to decide that for anyone. Everyone deserves the space to define themselves on their own terms. And on top of that, I honestly feel like this generation of the LGBTQ+ community has started to make a mockery of everything the people before us fought to survive. Being gay used to be about the right to live freely, to love who we love without fear or shame. It was about courage, resistance, and authenticity. Now it feels like it’s been watered down into a spectacle, more about being loud, performative, and trendy than about real connection or meaning. Being gay doesn’t mean being feminine. It doesn’t mean using certain pronouns. It doesn’t mean dressing in leather or having sex in the streets at events like Folsom. That might be someone’s personal expression, and they have every right to it, but it’s not what being gay is. And I’m tired of being automatically associated with all of that just because I’m gay. We fought to be seen as individuals, not to be lumped into another box with a new set of expectations. Let people define what being gay, straight, bisexual, hetero, or flexible means for them, and stop trying to make it one-size-fits-all.
Similar threads
