Joey Birlem

They look comfortable around each other... maybe they'll decide to spice things up in their OFs :rolleyes:
They have been going to the gym together and working out together for 2 years, they have definitely seen each other naked, maybe they had a little experiment. While Hunter is away, Brandon and Joey will play ;)
 
From what my eyes can tell, it's not a fake bulge but it's a very carefully planned one. First you have the black underwear not showing too much, then you have the right angles and finally he's not soft, it's a semi.

I've said it before and still stand by it (perhaps we'll soon see): Joey is completely average. Anywhere from 5 inches to 6. No more, no less.
I think he could be a bit bigger, like 6.5
 
  • Love
Reactions: Qfp
Instead of directly replying, let me leave this here for everyone. Tho, while this is in this thread, this also applies to every single performer.

You don't need to pay for it.
If you'd go on a date, you'd pay probably more, without even seeing anything.

All that "free to watch" porn that has been exploiting actors has corrupted most peoples sense for worth of the human body and dignity. If you think $35 is too much to see a persons lewds that you otherwise would have never seen, then it's you who is wrong and greedy, not the person that puts it's own body out there for the thirst.

If you consume pop culture, then you are part of the problem, not of the solution, as "Influencers" showing off and squeezing money out of their last remains of "fame" is a direct consequence of building up and burning down "fame" in pop culture.

Can we stop fucking discussing and blaming self organized Adult Entertainment workers? Either go for it, or leave it. Or are you going to a private room in a strip club and then complain about the prices? I doubt that. And on OnlyFans, for the first time in history, the entertainers can freely decide their own worth in a very convenient and safe way for both the entertainer and the consumer.

Instead of complaining; calm down, relax, breathe through your pants and be thankful someone posts stuff so you don't have to pay. And learn about the frigin' free market system.
 
Instead of directly replying, let me leave this here for everyone. Tho, while this is in this thread, this also applies to every single performer.

You don't need to pay for it.
If you'd go on a date, you'd pay probably more, without even seeing anything.

All that "free to watch" porn that has been exploiting actors has corrupted most peoples sense for worth of the human body and dignity. If you think $35 is too much to see a persons lewds that you otherwise would have never seen, then it's you who is wrong and greedy, not the person that puts it's own body out there for the thirst.

If you consume pop culture, then you are part of the problem, not of the solution, as "Influencers" showing off and squeezing money out of their last remains of "fame" is a direct consequence of building up and burning down "fame" in pop culture.

Can we stop fucking discussing and blaming self organized Adult Entertainment workers? Either go for it, or leave it. Or are you going to a private room in a strip club and then complain about the prices? I doubt that. And on OnlyFans, for the first time in history, the entertainers can freely decide their own worth in a very convenient and safe way for both the entertainer and the consumer.

Instead of complaining; calm down, relax, breathe through your pants and be thankful someone posts stuff so you don't have to pay. And learn about the frigin' free market system.

WTF even is this!? Something's really should be left in the drafts... this really doesn't have anything to do with this thread...

No one here has talked about going on a date with anyone...

He, as of yet, hasn't posted anything that could be considered "lewd". All of his pics could appear on the front cover of a magazine displayed in full view of the public without issue.

$35 is more than the monthly subscription price of just about every porn website out there... Paying that for a single picture/short video that again are not lewd at all, is way over market price... Since you're so keen on the free market then you'd also know that if you set your prices too high you significantly reduce the number of buyers.

I have no idea what the whole part about pop culture and "self organized adult entertainment workers" even is...

Maybe you should take your own advice... Instead of posting this unhinged diatribe of nonsense; calm down, relax, and breathe through your pants...

Also, WTF does "breathe through your pants" even mean!?!?
 
WTF even is this!? Something's really should be left in the drafts... this really doesn't have anything to do with this thread...

No one here has talked about going on a date with anyone...

He, as of yet, hasn't posted anything that could be considered "lewd". All of his pics could appear on the front cover of a magazine displayed in full view of the public without issue.

$35 is more than the monthly subscription price of just about every porn website out there... Paying that for a single picture/short video that again are not lewd at all, is way over market price... Since you're so keen on the free market then you'd also know that if you set your prices too high you significantly reduce the number of buyers.

I have no idea what the whole part about pop culture and "self organized adult entertainment workers" even is...

Maybe you should take your own advice... Instead of posting this unhinged diatribe of nonsense; calm down, relax, and breathe through your pants...

Also, WTF does "breathe through your pants" even mean!?!?
You do realise people who model like in underwear for magazines or porn sites do it for a price too ... $35 is barely much compared to what porn stars and models get for showing their body so you cant really compare the 2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neijo
You do realise people who model like in underwear for magazines or porn sites do it for a price too ... $35 is barely much compared to what porn stars and models get for showing their body so you cant really compare the 2.

You do realize the consumer doesn't pay $35 per picture in the magazine either, right??? They pay maybe $5 for a copy of one issue full of pictures and ads... FFS, if that were the case it would cost hundreds if not thousands of dollars to buy a single copy of one issue of a magazine... You really thought that one through didn't you???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sam_hh and Rokea55