Drainmyrod
Worshipped Member
You right he’ll just keep getting better with age.
Kit Connor
- Thread starter 121994
- Start date
-
- Tags
- kit connor netflix
- Status
Drainmyrod
Worshipped Member
Lol > the moderators will be sending you a stern warning no doubt!
Bizarre moderator policy though since actor Kit Connor is 18y/o legal adult age and his current character role in "A Cuban Girl's Guide" is also 18+y/o > BUT since one his other characters "Nick Nelson" is only 16y/o > this means there can be NO naughty comments made about 18y/o actor Kit Connor or his other 18y/o legal age characters aside from "Nick Nelson"!
LOL > The actual fair-minded logic behind this moderator policy totally escapes me!Seems pretty simple to me. You cannot talk about him in reference to his minor character. No pictures or videos of him as that character either.
AGREED > BUT > posters are being given warnings for making naughty comments about photos of 18y/o ADULT Kit Connor NOT playing 16y/o character "Nick Nelson" > which would understandably be "underage off-limits" > Photos of legal age adult Kit Connor off-camera posted on social media and not on-set playing "Nick Nelson"!
OR photos of Kit Connor playing a legal age 18y/o+ character in his new movie currently in production > NOT an underage character > yet posters are being given warnings for these NON-NICK NELSON photos, both off-camera and on-set
AGREED > BUT > posters are being given warnings for making naughty comments about photos of 18y/o ADULT Kit Connor NOT playing 16y/o character "Nick Nelson" > which would understandably be "underage off-limits" > Photos of legal age adult Kit Connor off-camera posted on social media and not on-set playing "Nick Nelson"!
OR photos of Kit Connor playing a legal age 18y/o+ character in his new movie currently in production > NOT an underage character > yet posters are being given warnings for these NON-NICK NELSON photos, both off-camera and on-set
This makes zero sense... Words aren't meant to be in a salad...
Screencaps, videos or promotional photography of him as his character will be off-limits, now the behind the scenes pics would fall under a gray area... not sure how the moderators will deal with that.
Keeping it really simple for "H.O.T." posters online here > Photos of Kit playing 16y/o underage "Nick Nelson" should definitely be off-limits for sexy-talk...
Photos of 18y/o legal adult actor Kit Connor, not in character as "Nick Nelson" should be open to sexy-talk, including photos of Kit playing other LEGAL AGE characters in other productions
This actually makes great sense!
What is your use of ">" meant to represent?
It's really not difficult. No pictures or discussion of anyone (real or fictional) who is under 18. Pretty simple and straight forward... I'm really not sure how it is so difficult for some to comprehend.
It's an old internet thing. Like early days. The > is supposed to make a new paragraph
Lmao... There's no way that's what they're using it for... My brain hurts applying that to their comments...
AGREED > BUT > posters are being given warnings for making naughty comments about photos of 18y/o ADULT Kit Connor NOT playing 16y/o character "Nick Nelson" > which would understandably be "underage off-limits" > Photos of legal age adult Kit Connor off-camera posted on social media and not on-set playing "Nick Nelson"!
OR photos of Kit Connor playing a legal age 18y/o+ character in his new movie currently in production > NOT an underage character > yet posters are being given warnings for these NON-NICK NELSON photos, both off-camera and on-set
What in the helllllllllllKeeping it really simple for "H.O.T." posters online here > Photos of Kit playing 16y/o underage "Nick Nelson" should definitely be off-limits for sexy-talk...
Photos of 18y/o legal adult actor Kit Connor, not in character as "Nick Nelson" should be open to sexy-talk, including photos of Kit playing other LEGAL AGE characters in other productions
This actually makes great sense!
Talk to an admin. But please stop with the >. Commas and periods exist.
It's the only logical explanation. Because the only other text form I've seen use > is for quoting. Like on forums like 4chan if you put > before something it'll highlight it and show it as a quote. But he's no quoting anyone, so it has to be the old usage for paragraphsLmao... There's no way that's what they're using it for... My brain hurts applying that to their comments...
JML88
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 7
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 101
- Points
- 38
- Location
- United States
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
Serving Gregg Sulkin (another English cutie <3 lol)
Except that that logic instantly fails when you try to apply it to what he's been typing lol
i said it's the logical explanation. which means his reasoning his not logical. if it were, people would've got it
Matty1203
Superior Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2022
- Posts
- 197
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 3,526
- Points
- 288
- Location
- London, ON, Canada
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
Do I see a bulge in that one pixel??
![08B849FB-0B29-4826-A0D4-2B5EE91D91E8.jpeg]( "08B849FB-0B29-4826-A0D4-2B5EE91D91E8.jpeg")
- Status
