Measured porn stars??

Not sure why you guys are making snarky comments. He didn't make any conclusions. You want to bitch that the measuring is inaccurate? Guess what. Almost all of the measurements in this whole thread are inaccurate. Almost all of them cheat the measurement. Simply snorting "that's not accurate" at this point in a 171 page thread is amateur hour.
We KNOW the measurements as applied in almost all those scenes are misleading. If someone posts a picture but isn't making any claims about the size, then what do YOU think the size is?
 
It's possible to get Rico Strong's exact size with a bit of detective work, because Gabriella Paltrova pretty much measures him here fully erect:

View attachment 596354

View attachment 596355

It is a baseball cap, with the words "Bang", there cannot be too many of those:

View attachment 596356

If we had the length of the front section of the cap, we would have his exact size.
Well we could go by her eyes, the average human eye is almost
exactly an inch long
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldzilla and Ocine
So... out of obsession, I purchased that remote in which slim poke had placed against his cock in comparison, and found that my suspicions were right when it came to the dimensions of the remote on amazon. The remote, when properly measured, yields a length of 9.31 inches in length.
Sadly though, my phone is unable to capture the depth perception of the remote and the ruler (the remote is slightly raised in the back, this is why my phone cannot capture it when the remote and ruler are placed on top of one another), as in, the remote looks as if it is being measured at .125-.25 inches instead of zero at the beginning and 9 inches instead of 9.31 inches at the end.
The first pic presents the depth of the remote in which my camera cannot capture and the second pic presents what I was stating earlier in how the camera is deceiving the eye, by making the eye see the ruler start at .125-.25 inches on the remote (when it really starts at zero) and end at 9 inches (really ends at 9.31 inches). So take it in which you want it, I have no reason to downplay or up-play the guy, I just simply want to truthfully know his size (penis detective lol).
20161213_165510.jpg
20161213_165558.jpg
 

Attachments

Not a perfect hand/dick comparison but pretty damn close. I took snaps of cindy starfall's hands on slims and mandingos cock. I had to go off of knuckles and side of hand due to no showing of the whole backside of the hand (backside of hand portrays the hand width more accurately), which led me to overestimate Cindy's handwidth a bit. If there's a slight advantage for slim pokes hand/dick ration, it was not intentional (again, there were zero times in which Cindy shows the whole backside of her hand with either slim or mandingo, so I had to visually guesstimate) but it further shows that mandingo (even without seeing the full hand width of Cindy starfall, and slightly overestimating it) seems to be equal with slim. All in all, both slim and mandingo with the helping hand of Cindy Starfall, we're able to have roughly up to 3 ( Cindy's) full hands on their cocks.

Screenshot_2016-12-13-21-01-23.jpg
Screenshot_2016-12-13-21-00-37.jpg
Screenshot_2016-12-13-21-01-00.jpg
Screenshot_2016-12-13-21-00-14.jpg
Screenshot_2016-12-13-21-00-26.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldzilla
So... out of obsession, I purchased that remote in which slim poke had placed against his cock in comparison, and found that my suspicions were right when it came to the dimensions of the remote on amazon. The remote, when properly measured, yields a length of 9.31 inches in length.
Sadly though, my phone is unable to capture the depth perception of the remote and the ruler (the remote is slightly raised in the back, this is why my phone cannot capture it when the remote and ruler are placed on top of one another), as in, the remote looks as if it is being measured at .125-.25 inches instead of zero at the beginning and 9 inches instead of 9.31 inches at the end.
The first pic presents the depth of the remote in which my camera cannot capture and the second pic presents what I was stating earlier in how the camera is deceiving the eye, by making the eye see the ruler start at .125-.25 inches on the remote (when it really starts at zero) and end at 9 inches (really ends at 9.31 inches). So take it in which you want it, I have no reason to downplay or up-play the guy, I just simply want to truthfully know his size (penis detective lol).
View attachment 597022 View attachment 597023

upload_2016-12-9_21-45-15-png.593568

cd2f8ddf820583337b0b3f8553239b29080e1532.png


327137-1d70959d624affd41faaf3d3cafb9118.jpg


wesley pipes and slim poke similar size, maybe 8.5 inchess
mandingo 9inchs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigger4life
It further shows that mandingo seems to be equal with slim.

No. If you want to make that kind of comparison the angles and positions must be the same.
Your Slim pics are good and do show 3 hands along the cock, but in Mandingo's pics the hand is at the base and the cock is pointing away from the camera.
Imagine the hand moving to the other end of the cock, it would appear much smaller. Taking the perspective into account there would be more than 3 hands along the cock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dgyeezy
No. If you want to make that kind of comparison the angles and positions must be the same.
Your Slim pics are good and do show 3 hands along the cock, but in Mandingo's pics the hand is at the base and the cock is pointing away from the camera.
Imagine the hand moving to the other end of the cock, it would appear much smaller. Taking the perspective into account there would be more than 3 hands along the cock.

Why people think it's okay to use photos from angles like this in any circumstance, I will never know. This is something a child should be able to understand. We live in a world of 3 dimensions, gotta acknowledge all of them.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: sdp
Why people think it's okay to use photos from angles like this in any circumstance, I will never know.

Photos from angles like this can be used if the hand is halfway down the cock. Still it wouldn't account for the curved perspective induced by the wide angle lens but unless the base of the cock is really close to the camera it doesn't make a huge difference.
 
Can't see how this is 6.5" - besides Ramon seems a tad longer than Shane Diesel in their flicks together. And Shane's 7.5".

Shane is not 7.5 inches, why do you keep saying this?

upload_2016-11-12_22-36-56-png.571844


If Shane was 7.5 inches long, the tape would start at 2.5 inches. It doesn't. You can clearly see the 2" mark on the tape, there is still shaft there, the tape does not start at 2 or 2.5!! Impossible. You will admit this right? Anyone can see this!! It's there in the measurement. :)

The downplaying on here by certain users :rolleyes:
 
Shane is not 7.5 inches, why do you keep saying this?

upload_2016-11-12_22-36-56-png.571844


If Shane was 7.5 inches long, the tape would start at 2.5 inches. It doesn't. You can clearly see the 2" mark on the tape, there is still shaft there, the tape does not start at 2 or 2.5!! Impossible. You will admit this right? Anyone can see this!! It's there in the measurement. :)

The downplaying on here by certain users :rolleyes:

At this point, why even waste my time with this, but here goes...

Because if you take a hard ruler, bring the penis completely perpendicular to the torso, and measure in a straight line, not following the curve with a tape ---which yields the outside curve length of a penis, not the true length --- and keep the measurement in a straight, non-straying-from-centre-line along the dorsal side of the penis, you would get a sub-8" measurement.

Now I'm going to ask of you what I think a lot people would sincerely appreciate: please shut the fuck up.
 
Because if you take a hard ruler

If, if, if. Nobody is talking about ifs or pulling out an imaginary ruler, we are talking about what is visible in the measurements with our own eyes. Just look. :D

Look above. Shane is not 7.5 inches in that measurement. You can see with your own eyes, the tape does not start at 2 or 2.5, therefore he is longer than 7.5 inches in that measurement. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: dgyeezy and bustedm
No. If you want to make that kind of comparison the angles and positions must be the same.
Your Slim pics are good and do show 3 hands along the cock, but in Mandingo's pics the hand is at the base and the cock is pointing away from the camera.
Imagine the hand moving to the other end of the cock, it would appear much smaller. Taking the perspective into account there would be more than 3 hands along the cock.

I'll take note of that;)
 
Shane is not 7.5 inches, why do you keep saying this?

Because it's his size as proven by his dildo.

upload_2016-11-12_22-36-56-png.571844


If Shane was 7.5 inches long, the tape would start at 2.5 inches. It doesn't. You can clearly see the 2" mark on the tape, there is still shaft there, the tape does not start at 2 or 2.5!! Impossible. You will admit this right? Anyone can see this!! It's there in the measurement. :)

If his cock was level and they used a ruler you would have a correct measurement. If I used a tape to measure my height following my curves, I would easily be 6'. IRL I'm not even close.

The downplaying on here by certain users :rolleyes:

The fantasising on here by two users ;)
 
upload_2016-12-9_21-45-15-png.593568

cd2f8ddf820583337b0b3f8553239b29080e1532.png


327137-1d70959d624affd41faaf3d3cafb9118.jpg


wesley pipes and slim poke similar size, maybe 8.5 inchess
mandingo 9inchs

Scratch...scratch...(upon my head)? Uhhh no. Though I do not have the patience and tenacity to argue your opinion of "8.5 inches", I will say that slim if quite flaccid and semi hard in his scenes and its a bit of a bitch to capture the times in which hes hard. And the times in which he is hard, he is definitely not below 9 inches, I can bet my eyes and knowledge of a ruler on that, but anyways at the end of the day this is all up in the air hypothetical shit, so each to their own;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldzilla
Because it's his size as proven by his dildo.

Shane Diesel's dildo is not 7.5 inches long lol.

I direct you to user bustedm's post on the Shane Diesel thread that debunked that idea:

The Shane Diesel dildo is 10 inches long. This can be verified at any number of online stores.
The advertised "insertable length" of the dildo is 7 1/2 inches.
Even a dullard can see that the suction cup portion of the dildo cannot possibly take up 2 1/2 inches of the total length.
The "insertable length" of the dildo is 7 1/2 inches due to the molded testicles that do not move.
Thus, the dildo when measured along the top to the suction cup must be more than 7 1/2 inches long.

In response to this

The fantasising on here by two users

No fantasy at all, I am just saying what his measurement shows from the picture directly above. He is longer than 7.5 inches erect. In that measurement he is about 8.25 inches long, which most rational people peg him at.