Back on p.e again ? Seriously ? You tube full of sketchy before an after , not to insult your man sdp , that you guys love so much . My personal theory is some benefit of at least some of the less draconian type stretching , would be increased blood flow to the penis . It obviously grows the blood vessels dramatically . ( The dick is only as big as how much blood it can hold ). So I think what happens is : these subjects are suddenly able to achieve longer , and stronger erections .So I think p.e can be thought of as just maximizing what it potentially already was .Rather than it actuallly a ( growing or stretching the penis into a new permanent state .like I said , that's just my personal theory , take it how you want it . .....please excuse the handwriting ...
Measured porn stars??
- Thread starter _avg_
- Start date
- Clod,
Nah. People who are growers before PE tend to leave it showers. It does more than just increase erection hardness, otherwise viagra would be adding inches to people’s cocks.
Ariana Marie did a scene with Sly Diggler and she has also done scenes with Mandingo, Dredd, and Danny D.
If someone wanted to do some sort of comparison shot, may be worth it.
If someone wanted to do some sort of comparison shot, may be worth it.
Let's see if we can get tinyprincess to fund that research. A tidy little infographic would be nice for a change.
Sorry to open up a previous debate but I believe I can end it.
The debate that went on many pages was about what size "big" dick started at and Lance Bass wrote many times 6.5 is not big to women and two other users disagreed and said 6.5 is where big dick begins as 6.5 is obviously longer than average.
Please all watch this short video.
![upload_2021-3-15_0-50-50.png]( "upload_2021-3-15_0-50-50.png")
This guy is a legit 6.75" lets not even dispute that. There is far too much nitpicking and negativity sometimes posted here. We need to give credit where it is due. That is 100% legit and there is nothing at fault here, thats just a screenshot I took but at 0:28 there is a full body shot so no he did not cheat any way at all. It's an NBP measurement.
He also does a bone pressed measurement directly after and we can see he gets nearly an inch bone pressed this is why bone pressed measurements are not reliable in porn. Measurement should always be NBP visible penis length and his first NBP measure was perfect.
Now I raised this video because this guy clearly has a big dick. It's an honest 6.75
I am willing to retract my previous comment that big dick begins at 7 or 7.25. An honest 6.75 is honestly a big cock. I am being objective about this. Lance Bass may reply that this is wrong but sorry, no. Look where 5 or 5.5 is on the ruler. This guy is WELL above that. This is the definition of a BIG dick and his girth is average. So no, you don't need a giant girth to have a big dick in the 6" range. I am saying with all honesty a 6.75 cock is a big cock.
A 6.75" honestly measured is where I say big dick begins. Johnny Sins is around 7" long and we all know he is big.
This idea that you need to have bigger than 7 inches to be big is wrong IMO. We have direct proof above from an honest measurement.
I think a compromise to end that debate is to say big dick begins at 6.75" because that is what the evidence shows. The guy in the video is not even using good camera equipment. Imagine that dick in porn.
Lastly here is another cock not measured in a good way (its nowhere near 7.5) but it could be 6.75 or maybe even 6.5" properly measured with good girth
![upload_2021-3-15_1-7-14.png]( "upload_2021-3-15_1-7-14.png")
You can see the video as well. It just looks very impressive.
Is Lance Bass willing to admit he might have been slightly wrong about this? I am not saying 6.75 is a monster cock but it does fit the criteria as big.
6.75 for me is the start of big dick porn and that is a good compromise to end the debate. Any thoughts?
The debate that went on many pages was about what size "big" dick started at and Lance Bass wrote many times 6.5 is not big to women and two other users disagreed and said 6.5 is where big dick begins as 6.5 is obviously longer than average.
Please all watch this short video.
This guy is a legit 6.75" lets not even dispute that. There is far too much nitpicking and negativity sometimes posted here. We need to give credit where it is due. That is 100% legit and there is nothing at fault here, thats just a screenshot I took but at 0:28 there is a full body shot so no he did not cheat any way at all. It's an NBP measurement.
He also does a bone pressed measurement directly after and we can see he gets nearly an inch bone pressed this is why bone pressed measurements are not reliable in porn. Measurement should always be NBP visible penis length and his first NBP measure was perfect.
Now I raised this video because this guy clearly has a big dick. It's an honest 6.75
I am willing to retract my previous comment that big dick begins at 7 or 7.25. An honest 6.75 is honestly a big cock. I am being objective about this. Lance Bass may reply that this is wrong but sorry, no. Look where 5 or 5.5 is on the ruler. This guy is WELL above that. This is the definition of a BIG dick and his girth is average. So no, you don't need a giant girth to have a big dick in the 6" range. I am saying with all honesty a 6.75 cock is a big cock.
A 6.75" honestly measured is where I say big dick begins. Johnny Sins is around 7" long and we all know he is big.
This idea that you need to have bigger than 7 inches to be big is wrong IMO. We have direct proof above from an honest measurement.
I think a compromise to end that debate is to say big dick begins at 6.75" because that is what the evidence shows. The guy in the video is not even using good camera equipment. Imagine that dick in porn.
Lastly here is another cock not measured in a good way (its nowhere near 7.5) but it could be 6.75 or maybe even 6.5" properly measured with good girth
You can see the video as well. It just looks very impressive.
Is Lance Bass willing to admit he might have been slightly wrong about this? I am not saying 6.75 is a monster cock but it does fit the criteria as big.
6.75 for me is the start of big dick porn and that is a good compromise to end the debate. Any thoughts?
- Clod,
I completely agree with all of this & that's a great vid for displaying proper measuring too. I'd also say a bit shorter than that CAN be big IF it has big girth. Inb4 shitstorm...
I personally believe 6.5 nbp is big, i mean look at Jordi for example, hes around 6.5 give or take and he looks pretty long in his videos.
I’m still getting Jordi at 6.25. Obviously he could be bigger cause he may not have been at full mast. But I’ve analyzed that entire measurement scene and am confident with 6.25.I personally believe 6.5 nbp is big, i mean look at Jordi for example, hes around 6.5 give or take and he looks pretty long in his videos.
![5a602b2081ac2.jpg]()
I’m gonna bite my tongue though with the “where big starts” debate.
I think long starts around 6.5'' nbp.
The angle and perspective the guy measured isn't the most flattering. Would be nice if he had more vids showing different angles & perspectives while erect.
Regarding size and what's "big" I think it's important to distinguish what we are comparing to. 6" NBP in porn is drastically & statistically different from 6" NBP in real life and so on.
However even by porn standards I think 6.5+ NBP can look long depending on the frame, the girl, length/girth proportions, etc. since some of the 7" guys like Johnny Sins can look really long and .5" length isn't a drastic difference.
99% agree with that last 1% being that I don't think that first guy has average girth. He looks a bit above average assuming average is 4.75-5.00, he looks around 5.25 maybe even a tiny bit more. Maybe I'm wrong tho.
I would agree with you, I think 6.5 with good girth or 6.75 with any girth looks big (or at least long in the 2nd case). 7+ is too long to consider the start of long because that is very long in an NBP sense, most pornstars are under that.
I think part of the issue is most people do not measure accurately. We are talking true, legitimate NBP length, most people do not measure themselves like that or even know what it is. 6.75 probably does not sound that impressive to these people. Seeing dicks that are that length as you showed might help people to visualize what that size truly is.
I understand some people make the argument that one has to be significantly above average size to seem as big in the real world (In other words you might be 90 something percentile or whatever but if the absolute difference is only a fraction of an inch over average, girls wont necessarily think of you as big.) But we have to remember the average NBP dick is around 5.5 inches at most. Anything 6.5+ would be an inch or more above average. That is a sizeable difference.
There are many dicks that are at least 6.5 but under 7 range in porn, in fact I would say this is probably the most common porn size. Somewhere here is where big/long has to apply.
I agree and we should also take into account that the overwhelming majority of men in the western world are over 20% body fat. That means their fat pad is at least 1 inch. So when we are referring to 6.5 nbp, that means we are referring to a 7.5 bpel. This is probably the 10th time that i use my self as an example but i think its good evidence. In my whole life I've always been in the 15% - 20 % body fat range. Probably 17% most of the year. Lets just say I look alot leaner than mandingo and lex steele. ( I had done a few dexa scans) and My fat pad is 0.9 inches. So it makes sense that most men on the street with love handles and a dad bod has a higher fat pad than me. I think 0.5 inch fat pad only applies to individuals at 12% body fat or lower and almost no one is that lean in general population in the western world with the exception of the fast metabolism guys and the few serious gym goers. So in that sense i can confidently say 6.5 nbp = 7.5 bpel and 6.75 nbp = 7.75 bpel for the majority of men in the western world and i don't think theres any exagerration to say thats the beginning of big.
This was posted before but deserves to be brought up again in relation to this discussion.
Here is Tyler Steel measured with a dollar at 20:55.
https://biguz.net/video/?id=1051324...nt-girl-fucks-for-tuition-money-with-stranger
Measured from the top he is barely bigger then 6.14" (the dollar) so he can't be anything bigger then 6.5" NBP and he still looks long to me.
Here is Tyler Steel measured with a dollar at 20:55.
https://biguz.net/video/?id=1051324...nt-girl-fucks-for-tuition-money-with-stranger
Measured from the top he is barely bigger then 6.14" (the dollar) so he can't be anything bigger then 6.5" NBP and he still looks long to me.
Yep its been posted before.
And yah he is arond 6 to 6.5 NBP and as you can see from the posts above yours, that is where a lot of us believe a dick begins to look big at 6.5 NBP.
I think that 6.5 is pretty big, if it is straight. If it has a upward curve it hink it needs to be closer to 7 to really have the same effect visually, at least if I compare myself because I have a decent upward curve similar to Blanco and I am currently at 6.7 or so.
Well since everybody seems to enjoy talking about that debate no reason for me to hold off...
I agree with the above that 6.5 is where length starts to look big. In fact that was my original argument following Lance claim that “7.25 is where big starts”. However, I then interpreted the question not as A.“where do *you* think a dick starts to *look* long? but B. “When *statistically* does a dick become long?”
If A, my answer is around 6.5 because my viewing sample size is mostly porn.If B, my answer is around 6.0 because that’s what the science shows.
I agree with the above that 6.5 is where length starts to look big. In fact that was my original argument following Lance claim that “7.25 is where big starts”. However, I then interpreted the question not as A.“where do *you* think a dick starts to *look* long? but B. “When *statistically* does a dick become long?”
If A, my answer is around 6.5 because my viewing sample size is mostly porn.If B, my answer is around 6.0 because that’s what the science shows.
I agree on length with 7.25 possible. Maybe closer to 6” girth cause he doesn’t look the same or more than Shane to me.
I have not read all posts 
but I it may be some ”male-guessing” on penis- sizes...
No need to guess when there are science.
And science exist that is NOT based on unreliable self-reporting and/or bias with men larger than avarage to apply for a study
Link:
How big is the average penis?
from the article:
”Many earlier studies relied on self-reporting, which doesn’t always yield reliable results. “People tend to overestimate themselves,” says David Veale, a psychiatrist at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. So when Veale and his team set out to settle the score on penile proportions, they decided to compile data from clinicians who followed a standardized measuring procedure.
Published today in the British Journal of Urology International, their new study synthesizes data from 17 previous academic papers that included measurements from a total of 15,521 men from around the world.
”
”According to the team’s analysis, the average flaccid, pendulous penis is 9.16 cm (3.61 inches) in length; the average erect penis is 13.12 cm (5.16 inches) long. The corresponding girth measurements are 9.31 cm (3.66 inches) for a flaccid penis and 11.66 cm (4.59 inches) for an erect one.
A graph of the size distribution shows that outliers are rare. A 16-cm (6.3-inch) erect penis falls into the 95th percentile: Out of 100 men, only five would have a penis larger than 16 cm. Conversely, an erect penis measuring 10 cm (3.94 inches) falls into the 5th percentile: Only five out of 100 men would have a penis smaller than 10 cm.
”
![upload_2021-3-15_21-8-55.png]( "upload_2021-3-15_21-8-55.png")
but I it may be some ”male-guessing” on penis- sizes...No need to guess when there are science.
And science exist that is NOT based on unreliable self-reporting and/or bias with men larger than avarage to apply for a study
Link:
How big is the average penis?
from the article:
”Many earlier studies relied on self-reporting, which doesn’t always yield reliable results. “People tend to overestimate themselves,” says David Veale, a psychiatrist at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. So when Veale and his team set out to settle the score on penile proportions, they decided to compile data from clinicians who followed a standardized measuring procedure.
Published today in the British Journal of Urology International, their new study synthesizes data from 17 previous academic papers that included measurements from a total of 15,521 men from around the world.
”
”According to the team’s analysis, the average flaccid, pendulous penis is 9.16 cm (3.61 inches) in length; the average erect penis is 13.12 cm (5.16 inches) long. The corresponding girth measurements are 9.31 cm (3.66 inches) for a flaccid penis and 11.66 cm (4.59 inches) for an erect one.
A graph of the size distribution shows that outliers are rare. A 16-cm (6.3-inch) erect penis falls into the 95th percentile: Out of 100 men, only five would have a penis larger than 16 cm. Conversely, an erect penis measuring 10 cm (3.94 inches) falls into the 5th percentile: Only five out of 100 men would have a penis smaller than 10 cm.
”
