Measured porn stars??

D

deleted978960

Guest
How did y'all skip over this?
because it was discussed million times before his name is doubblelongdaddy he was a former member in thunder's and got banned then he started his own site for pe he is just a fraud trying to sell pe devices he claims to increase his penis from 6.5x4.75 to 11x7, also his pictures were proved to be fake many times before
 

Lance Bass

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Posts
3,504
Media
0
Likes
3,413
Points
148
Location
Indian Springs (Maryland, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
because it was discussed million times before his name is doubblelongdaddy he was a former member in thunder's and got banned then he started his own site for pe he is just a fraud trying to sell pe devices he claims to increase his penis from 6.5x4.75 to 11x7, also his pictures were proved to be fake many times before

@AVx22 @Nikeairs23
 

sdp

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Posts
1,678
Media
763
Likes
43,930
Points
618
Location
Blue Ball, PA, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
sdp can elaborate on what he did more in depth

More in depth I don't know, it's pretty straightforward, he worked from two different pics.
Contrary to his first attempt where one could detect repeating patterns on the cock, this is rather well done, he made sure that there'd be enough hand coverage to avoid exposing the same part of the cock twice.

There's a dead giveaway though: go grab your own cock or a similarly shaped object and try to make your hand look exactly like his. Impossible right? It's as though his hand has no thickness at the knuckles, and that's because the top part of the hand comes from the other pic where the hand was in a slightly different position.
 
Last edited:

The Meat Rod Cometh

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 9, 2017
Posts
1,220
Media
20
Likes
2,771
Points
258
Location
Boise (Idaho, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
More in depth I don't know, it's pretty straightforward, he worked from two different pics.
Contrary to his first attempt where one could detect repeating patterns on the cock, this is rather well done, he made sure that there'd be enough hand coverage to avoid exposing the same part of the cock twice.

There's a dead giveaway though: go grab your own cock or a similarly shaped object and try to make your hand look exactly like his. Impossible right? It's as though his hand has no thickness at the knuckles, and that's because the top part of the hand comes from the other pic where the hand was in a slightly different position.

Boom, There you have it again boys! DEBUNKED! LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lance Bass

Shepardson

Superior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Posts
2,770
Media
0
Likes
3,986
Points
208
Gender
Male
try to make your hand look exactly like his. Impossible right? It's as though his hand has no thickness at the knuckles, and that's because the top part of the hand comes from the other pic where the hand was in a slightly different position.
Man, that is some screwed up shit if that's what's going on. It's like the lump where his pointer finger knuckle should be has been pulled back to where his thumb begins. I need to look around for a larger version to study (think I might have one).

Not that I have any doubts about whether his images are doctored. It's just interesting to see exactly what people have done to achieve it.
 

Snakebyte

Superior Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2005
Posts
9,983
Media
0
Likes
6,763
Points
708
More in depth I don't know, it's pretty straightforward, he worked from two different pics.
Contrary to his first attempt where one could detect repeating patterns on the cock, this is rather well done, he made sure that there'd be enough hand coverage to avoid exposing the same part of the cock twice.

There's a dead giveaway though: go grab your own cock or a similarly shaped object and try to make your hand look exactly like his. Impossible right? It's as though his hand has no thickness at the knuckles, and that's because the top part of the hand comes from the other pic where the hand was in a slightly different position.
All those fools have no clue about photoshop. It's so easy to get rid of repeating patterns in the skin. The thing is, every idiot can fake a picture nowadays so that it's hard to identify as fake. A person who really knows how to work with photoshop on the other hand will fake it without the slightest chance of anyone ever noticing.
 
D

deleted978960

Guest
Rob Piper chris strokes
1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lance Bass

sdp

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Posts
1,678
Media
763
Likes
43,930
Points
618
Location
Blue Ball, PA, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I need to look around for a larger version to study (think I might have one).

I have a larger version as well, but it's still too low-res to find any obvious seams or really damning artifacts IMO. There's what looks like blurring here and there but how can I be sure. Wait, the shadow of the thumb looks off... time for a little gamma boost.

dld-jpg.399995.jpg
 

RokiD

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2017
Posts
801
Media
0
Likes
1,061
Points
138
Location
Poland
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male

Alex22876

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Feb 6, 2013
Posts
2,362
Media
296
Likes
17,469
Points
483
Location
Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male

Shepardson

Superior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Posts
2,770
Media
0
Likes
3,986
Points
208
Gender
Male
All those fools have no clue about photoshop. It's so easy to get rid of repeating patterns in the skin. The thing is, every idiot can fake a picture nowadays so that it's hard to identify as fake. A person who really knows how to work with photoshop on the other hand will fake it without the slightest chance of anyone ever noticing.
All too true. Hell, you could grab skin off somebody else's and make a Frankendick if you really wanted to be certain there weren't any duplicates, or just flip,rotate,resize or distort the part you copied.

It's really getting frightening these days as digital editing of everything is moving further and further into the hands of "Joe Consumer" and is no longer strictly a pro thing. The boob threads and the "pear-shaped" thread look like they're over 50% shopped now and very few notice. I skimmed through the "other" section looking at trans dicks the other day, and now, even those guys are all bigger than the monster dick straight performers and I thought I remembered them usually being on the smaller side (maybe from hormones or something).

Not sure where exactly this is heading unless someone comes up with a really easy way to validate digital shit, but they'll just crack that the day it's released like everything else. It's a mess.

Take Care
 

Alex22876

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Feb 6, 2013
Posts
2,362
Media
296
Likes
17,469
Points
483
Location
Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male

RokiD

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2017
Posts
801
Media
0
Likes
1,061
Points
138
Location
Poland
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
7.8 x 2.1 diameter so like 6.5 girth
Actually I have seen even smaller cans in Poland, It can be 7.8 can but with cap on you genius and without its 7.25 in mine own and how about soda can comparing, how big is 330ml can? isnt it 12cm x 6cm?
And as I said fleshlight crystal is 8.5" long (without pushing) and how far he can go?