ConanTheBarber
Legendary Member
Gawd doesn't think so, and neither does glorious, soon-to-be-King Charles.Just contrary then?![]()
But they are often wrong.
Contrary??????? Perhaaaaaaps.
Facetious? Most certainly.
Gawd doesn't think so, and neither does glorious, soon-to-be-King Charles.Just contrary then?![]()
Once Scotland is independent weather or not the monarchy carries on it wont effect youState broadcaster went into full North Korean mode over the passing of a 99yo racist - and they're still at it, even after the funeral, and in spite of over 110,000 complaints about their blanket sycophantic coverage. Meat and drink for the battalion of "royal experts"
Let's hope that Britain grows up and becomes a republic after the nazi queen joins her husband. A country can't claim to be a proper democracy if a citizen can't aspire to become head of state.
Thank goodness Scotland is destined to become independent soon and we can leave Brexit Britain to continue on its journey to fascism.
State broadcaster went into full North Korean mode...
Delighted to know you never for one moment wondered what colour the baby would from the offspring of a 45% black American and a redhead because that would really be a racist thought!
I don't find them hilarious. And I would be dismayed to see someone in their twenties expressing some of those views. But in Philip, who was born in the early 1920s, I find someone who was fully shaped before the Second World War, probably typifies the views of a lot of Inglishmun of a certain age and class, and whose refusal to adapt to changing times probably wins some points, among some people, for an "I-yam-what-I-yam" authenticity.
I agree that he wasn't a bad character.
He was good enough. He was vivid. He was, at least imo, surprisingly real.
And he did the job.
"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?"
"Do you still throw spears at each other?"
"If you stay here much longer you will all be slitty-eyed,"
This isn't called 'observational comedy' in the UK, it's called being a racist cunt, unless you're a royalist and then a member of the royal family could piss in your mothers mouth and you'd find a way to excuse them for it.
Not knowing the context, his tone, or the reaction of whoever he was communicating with, I couldn’t say.
I’m not about to get worked up about someone who’s dead. lol
I'm honestly not sure how you can read;
"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?"
"Do you still throw spears at each other?"
"If you stay here much longer you will all be slitty-eyed,"
And think 'i don't know the context, tone or reaction', that's a really FoxNews 'here's video evidence but I don't want to admit it makes the situation clear so I have to be as vague as possible' attitude don't you think? I mean come on, how much more obvious could be it? Can you really not read any of those three statements and say 'yes, this is definitely something that I or a prince could say without being at all offensive and meaning only good things'.
When would you ever visit Australia and ask indigenous people if they throw spears at each other? or Scotland, who you're family have repeatedly invaded and subjugated, and then ask someone who teaches people how to drive how they keep Scottish people sober long enough to pass their test???? I know he's not standing in front of an orphanage and saying he hates poor people before throwing a Molotov cocktail threw the window but does it need to be that cut and dry and obvious for you?
Very good post, njersey.Here’s an analogous joke for you (and don’t worry, I’m all these things so it’s okay even by today’s standards).
A gay man and a Jew meet in a bar. They have some drinks and decide to hook up. They both get up and go to leave and the gay man asks, “are you going to leave the tip?” The Jew replies, “Are you crazy? No real Jew leaves the tip!”
Get it? Because gay men are hypersexual and make their dates pay and Jews are both cheap and circumcised? It’s funny because it’s not true. Minus the circumcision.
This introduces a logical complication. You see, I’m not homophobic or anti-semitic. I’m quite in love with myself and my sexuality and my ethnicity are my favorite aspects of myself.
So is my joke homophobic and anti-semitic? Can my words be something I’m not? Maybe only if I really meant it? Maybe it depends on who hears it? Maybe if it is a reflection of my true beliefs?
If I just wrote it down anonymously and someone found it, would the joke still be homophobic and anti-semitic?
Before we get too anthropomorphic here: words aren’t human beings. They don’t hold beliefs or opinions. Human beings do.
Now go through those lines. Do you really believe a presumably sane, reasonably educated adult would *truly* believe any of those things? Or was he making off-color jokes?
Do bad jokes make bad people?
Here’s an analogous joke for you (and don’t worry, I’m all these things so it’s okay even by today’s standards).
A gay man and a Jew meet in a bar. They have some drinks and decide to hook up. They both get up and go to leave and the gay man asks, “are you going to leave the tip?” The Jew replies, “Are you crazy? No real Jew leaves the tip!”
Get it? Because gay men are hypersexual and make their dates pay and Jews are both cheap and circumcised? It’s funny because it’s not true. Minus the circumcision.
This introduces a logical complication. You see, I’m not homophobic or anti-semitic. I’m quite in love with myself and my sexuality and my ethnicity are my favorite aspects of myself.
So is my joke homophobic and anti-semitic? Can my words be something I’m not? Maybe only if I really meant it? Maybe it depends on who hears it? Maybe if it is a reflection of my true beliefs?
If I just wrote it down anonymously and someone found it, would the joke still be homophobic and anti-semitic?
Before we get too anthropomorphic here: words aren’t human beings. They don’t hold beliefs or opinions. Human beings do.
Now go through those lines. Do you really believe a presumably sane, reasonably educated adult would *truly* believe any of those things? Or was he making off-color jokes?
Do bad jokes make bad people?
Here’s an analogous joke for you (and don’t worry, I’m all these things so it’s okay even by today’s standards).
A gay man and a Jew meet in a bar. They have some drinks and decide to hook up. They both get up and go to leave and the gay man asks, “are you going to leave the tip?” The Jew replies, “Are you crazy? No real Jew leaves the tip!”
Get it? Because gay men are hypersexual and make their dates pay and Jews are both cheap and circumcised? It’s funny because it’s not true. Minus the circumcision.
This introduces a logical complication. You see, I’m not homophobic or anti-semitic. I’m quite in love with myself and my sexuality and my ethnicity are my favorite aspects of myself.
So is my joke homophobic and anti-semitic? Can my words be something I’m not? Maybe only if I really meant it? Maybe it depends on who hears it? Maybe if it is a reflection of my true beliefs?
If I just wrote it down anonymously and someone found it, would the joke still be homophobic and anti-semitic?
Before we get too anthropomorphic here: words aren’t human beings. They don’t hold beliefs or opinions. Human beings do.
Now go through those lines. Do you really believe a presumably sane, reasonably educated adult would *truly* believe any of those things? Or was he making off-color jokes?
Do bad jokes make bad people?
Here’s an analogous joke for you (and don’t worry, I’m all these things so it’s okay even by today’s standards).
A gay man and a Jew meet in a bar. They have some drinks and decide to hook up. They both get up and go to leave and the gay man asks, “are you going to leave the tip?” The Jew replies, “Are you crazy? No real Jew leaves the tip!”
Get it? Because gay men are hypersexual and make their dates pay and Jews are both cheap and circumcised? It’s funny because it’s not true. Minus the circumcision.
This introduces a logical complication. You see, I’m not homophobic or anti-semitic. I’m quite in love with myself and my sexuality and my ethnicity are my favorite aspects of myself.
So is my joke homophobic and anti-semitic? Can my words be something I’m not? Maybe only if I really meant it? Maybe it depends on who hears it? Maybe if it is a reflection of my true beliefs?
If I just wrote it down anonymously and someone found it, would the joke still be homophobic and anti-semitic?
Before we get too anthropomorphic here: words aren’t human beings. They don’t hold beliefs or opinions. Human beings do.
Now go through those lines. Do you really believe a presumably sane, reasonably educated adult would *truly* believe any of those things? Or was he making off-color jokes?
Do bad jokes make bad people?
Who in this situation is without language?1/ without words/language people have no higher thoughts, concepts, ideas, imagination, history, memory or future. The language we use defines the world around us.
To the person you have to explain it to. Which certainly includes jamieb and perhaps includes you.2/ if you have to explain a joke, it's not funny![]()
Who in this situation is without language?.
time for the thread to take a break from life;ik,e the duke wsely did
noone can deny vacating a scene
Everybody on the planet starts this way, before we acquire language we have no thoughts or memories as we cannot describe the world around us - we are instinctive.
As a general rule of thumb, if you have to explain the joke, it's not funny. I said you were contrary![]()