Questions for the size deniers

[TexanStar]

I think size matters otherwise people wouldn't fixate on it.

To use one of your own examples, people do fixate on breast size.

Can you please let me know how you think breast size might "matter" to a sexual partner above and beyond their personal preference? Do women with larger breasts give their partners stronger or longer orgasms? Do women with small breasts have difficulty satisfying their partner?

 

[Doranq]

To use one of your own examples, people do fixate on breast size.

Can you please let me know how you think breast size might "matter" to a sexual partner above and beyond their personal preference? Do women with larger breasts give their partners stronger or longer orgasms? Do women with small breasts have difficulty satisfying their partner?

Breasts don't really offer much in the mechanical experiences of sex so I am not sure what your objective is here given their roles in sex are like comparing apples to oranges. So if your question is meant to somehow derail my post, you will be best served taking a more direct approach or at the very least using genitals vs genitals.

Pretty much the only impact breasts would have on sex is possibly how turned on he is. He may get more or less turned on with smaller breasts. Maybe if I stretched for their overall satisfaction, like how people may often report having more satisfying sex with someone who is more sexually appealing.hmmm or I guess it would give him the ability to brag about her assets given she has something that is deemed valuable (like a sense of pride/show horsing). Outside of that, tits do not do diddly squat in regards to sex. As far as satisfying him, nah she should be fine unless it is THAT much of a turn off for him. If she has physical difficulty the overwhelming odds are that it is something else.

Given the fact that women are scrutinized over their outer appearance and it very much does have an impact on their lives on whether or not they are deemed attractive. Breasts are heavily sexualized. Especially in the US. In another country it could be butts or something but here it is definitely boobs. So by "lacking" a specific trait you will be considered less attractive. Less attractive people generally are going to have a different experience than those who are attractive. You will find that people are not as nice to you had you been attractive.

This can impact how people may treat you in job interviews, how much they tip you, the way people talk about smaller breasts (in a similar boat as small dicks on the small is bad/big is good) They can be depicted as a negative quality or an indicator of one like she is jealous or envious. Because they are small they will say mean shit like she is flat like male which says that she is lacking something that is intrinsically female similar to one might say the same about a man with a small dick. They (try) to sell many things to give the illusion of a larger size and there are a good portion of women who do get breast surgery out of insecurity. Oft times sexual favoritism is shown to those with the larger chested women. Though that can work against them because their outfit may be considered lewd simply because of the size of their breasts.

A lot of jokes tend to be more disparaging when referring to smaller ones than when you do to bigger ones. stuff like this. There is a clear bias in the media, heck you can easily bolster your views by showing some cleavage.


Though I do want to say with women it is a bit more complicated because larger breasts do bring a lot of problems socially as well. Though it is a bit different than dicks given the fact men and women are judged for different things. Women generally get a lot of shit for being on any side of the scale while men it is a bit more linear, like left is bad but right is good.

 

[TexanStar]

Breasts don't really offer much in the mechanical experiences of sex so I am not sure what your objective is here given their roles in sex are like comparing apples to oranges. So if your question is meant to somehow derail my post, you will be best served taking a more direct approach or at the very least using genitals vs genitals.

Pretty much the only impact breasts would have on sex is possibly how turned on he is. He may get more or less turned on with smaller breasts. Maybe if I stretched for their overall satisfaction, like how people may often report having more satisfying sex with someone who is more sexually appealing.hmmm or I guess it would give him the ability to brag about her assets given she has something that is deemed valuable (like a sense of pride/show horsing). Outside of that, tits do not do diddly squat in regards to sex. As far as satisfying him, nah she should be fine unless it is THAT much of a turn off for him. If she has physical difficulty the overwhelming odds are that it is something else.

Given the fact that women are scrutinized over their outer appearance and it very much does have an impact on their lives on whether or not they are deemed attractive. Breasts are heavily sexualized. Especially in the US. In another country it could be butts or something but here it is definitely boobs. So by "lacking" a specific trait you will be considered less attractive. Less attractive people generally are going to have a different experience than those who are attractive. You will find that people are not as nice to you had you been attractive.

This can impact how people may treat you in job interviews, how much they tip you, the way people talk about smaller breasts (in a similar boat as small dicks on the small is bad/big is good) They can be depicted as a negative quality or an indicator of one like she is jealous or envious. Because they are small they will say mean shit like she is flat like male which says that she is lacking something that is intrinsically female similar to one might say the same about a man with a small dick. They (try) to sell many things to give the illusion of a larger size and there are a good portion of women who do get breast surgery out of insecurity. Oft times sexual favoritism is shown to those with the larger chested women. Though that can work against them because their outfit may be considered lewd simply because of the size of their breasts.

A lot of jokes tend to be more disparaging when referring to smaller ones than when you do to bigger ones. stuff like this. There is a clear bias in the media, heck you can easily bolster your views by showing some cleavage.


Though I do want to say with women it is a bit more complicated because larger breasts do bring a lot of problems socially as well. Though it is a bit different than dicks given the fact men and women are judged for different things. Women generally get a lot of shit for being on any side of the scale while men it is a bit more linear, like left is bad but right is good.

You were making an argument that some people's fixation on dick size is, in and of itself, evidence that dick size matters. Applying that logic to other parts that also have a tendency to be fixated upon was a fair exploration of the argument, not a derail.

You basically say that although breasts do get fixated upon, they only matter in so far as some people have a personal preference for it or may treat you differently because of it, but it doesn't really have a big relevance on actual sexual satisfaction. And if you say that, then why would it necessarily be any different for dick size?

 

[Trott.lint]

@Doranq Excellent post. Just can't quite understand your audacity at daring to mebtion penis size might matter on a site that begins with the words 'large penis'. But hey ho

 

[Doranq]

You were making an argument that some people's fixation on dick size is, in and of itself, evidence that dick size matters. Applying that logic to other parts that also have a tendency to be fixated upon was a fair exploration of the argument, not a derail.

You basically say that although breasts do get fixated upon, they only matter in so far as some people have a personal preference for it or may treat you differently because of it, but it doesn't really have a big relevance on actual sexual satisfaction. And if you say that, then why would it necessarily be any different for dick size?

Probably because you don't stick your tits inside a man nor do you generally cover a body part of his. You can do titty fucking but that is more niche and isn't really standard.

Given the fact that is quite common to have PIV sex it is quite obvious that size is going to play a factor. To say size doesn't matter or size plays no role would be to ignore the fact that physical incompatibilities exist. You can be too small or too big. A combination of too long or thick. Even things such as being a particular shape but given your size that shape becomes somewhat problematic when at a larger or smaller size it would not have been. It may limit what kinds of sex someone can have which can definitely impact their overall experience and satisfaction. If you are too big then you might not be able to go as rough or if she really likes bodies slapping, it just may not be an option. Or if you are too girthy in combination with your link you may not be able to slide past her cervix which means if you go deep BAM, insta pain for your lady friend. Quickies as well may not be a thing or you cannot target a specific area. Maybe you make her sore too quickly. On the other hand you may be too small to provide a full or deep sensation. You may very simply not be able to reach one of her pleasure spots such as the posterior fornix. Maybe she has a big butt and her hips are tilted just so that it can block you from entering period. She may not even feel you as the stimulation threshold was not met given that people have varying sensitivities. On the flipside you may be able to have nothing but pleasurable sex as there is no chance to bash your partner's cervix, rub her raw, or any pain other than perhaps slipping out and fking up your entrance which would be universal to all. Quickies would be a thing as it would require less warm up to accommodate a smaller penis.

The size of her vagina also plays a role buuuuuut given that the vagina is an internal organ, this is often overlooked as we are visual creatures and will turn our attention to what we can see. So her size while relevant is irrelevant :\ This would explain why there are a lot more men who are so deeply concerned with their size.
Size shaming though for women revolves more around slut shaming which is a whole different can of worms.


There are workarounds for some of these problems. However it should be noted that while there may be workarounds, not everyone cares. So the degree on which this matter will vary from one to another. Also some matchups may have no workarounds as far as PIV goes.

A lot of us are average and when paired up with average seems to work quite well. Not too many problems. That said, that doesn't indicate whether or not they are having what they might consider the ideal experience. That is left up to the individual. It should also be noted that the penis while not only a mechanical object can play a big role in appearance. Some people will have visual preferences for the look and the size.


Now you look at this and you'll notice that they both have cons and benefits. One would think they would be on even ground, nah. To use wally as an example. People similar to him are not very uncommon, (maybe not to the point he takes it) however the reverse of wally where it is someone soooo insecure about the mere fact they are above average or big I have yet to run into. Maybe huge but even then i have yet to run into. I come across a lot of pride, being content, and glad I'm as big as i am because I could of been smaller attitudes.


We could look at something unrelated but similar. If we look at race we can see it doesn't really matter in theory. It may come down to be personal preference for appearance........but yet it is an issue, an absolutely massive issue in different places. That is what I want to focus on. Why is something that otherwise shouldn't be an issue is blown up to be a much larger one that it is. Clearly there is an issue. So if we run back to dicks we kind of see the same thing. They aren't really that important in the grand schemes yet their importance is blown up. Women's appearances aren't really that important either yet it is blown up. So what happens at the end of the day is that yes they actually do matter. In a perfect world it wouldn't....but this isn't a perfect world.


So why are smaller ones routinely shat upon? why is being small viewed as such a negative thing. Why is it a go to insult or to add insult to injury?
Why is being large something one might be considered to be "lucky". Why would one appreciate the size they are because they could of been smaller?

Why are things not the reverse? Heck why not equal? like I said before if something truly didn't matter, we really wouldn't focus so much on it. I'm sure many men have been mocked for having one less fold in their eye lid,their ankles are more flat than pointy(visa versa), or the thickness of their shin is a little less than the average shin...oh wait no, no they haven't because no one really cares,....it doesn't matter :\ hell I'd go so far to say as most men haven't even considered that crap because it doesn't matter.


Clearly there is a problem which is the point I'm driving it. We are social creature and what others think of us and how others treat us does affect us all at some level.

 

[TexanStar]

Probably because you don't stick your tits inside a man nor do you generally cover a body part of his. You can do titty fucking but that is more niche and isn't really standard.

Given the fact that is quite common to have PIV sex it is quite obvious that size is going to play a factor. To say size doesn't matter or size plays no role would be to ignore the fact that physical incompatibilities exist. You can be too small or too big. A combination of too long or thick. Even things such as being a particular shape but given your size that shape becomes somewhat problematic when at a larger or smaller size it would not have been. It may limit what kinds of sex someone can have which can definitely impact their overall experience and satisfaction. If you are too big then you might not be able to go as rough or if she really likes bodies slapping, it just may not be an option. Or if you are too girthy in combination with your link you may not be able to slide past her cervix which means if you go deep BAM, insta pain for your lady friend. Quickies as well may not be a thing or you cannot target a specific area. Maybe you make her sore too quickly. On the other hand you may be too small to provide a full or deep sensation. You may very simply not be able to reach one of her pleasure spots such as the posterior fornix. Maybe she has a big butt and her hips are tilted just so that it can block you from entering period. She may not even feel you as the stimulation threshold was not met given that people have varying sensitivities. On the flipside you may be able to have nothing but pleasurable sex as there is no chance to bash your partner's cervix, rub her raw, or any pain other than perhaps slipping out and fking up your entrance which would be universal to all. Quickies would be a thing as it would require less warm up to accommodate a smaller penis.

The size of her vagina also plays a role buuuuuut given that the vagina is an internal organ, this is often overlooked as we are visual creatures and will turn our attention to what we can see. So her size while relevant is irrelevant :\ This would explain why there are a lot more men who are so deeply concerned with their size.
Size shaming though for women revolves more around slut shaming which is a whole different can of worms.


There are workarounds for some of these problems. However it should be noted that while there may be workarounds, not everyone cares. So the degree on which this matter will vary from one to another. Also some matchups may have no workarounds as far as PIV goes.

A lot of us are average and when paired up with average seems to work quite well. Not too many problems. That said, that doesn't indicate whether or not they are having what they might consider the ideal experience. That is left up to the individual. It should also be noted that the penis while not only a mechanical object can play a big role in appearance. Some people will have visual preferences for the look and the size.


Now you look at this and you'll notice that they both have cons and benefits. One would think they would be on even ground, nah. To use wally as an example. People similar to him are not very uncommon, (maybe not to the point he takes it) however the reverse of wally where it is someone soooo insecure about the mere fact they are above average or big I have yet to run into. Maybe huge but even then i have yet to run into. I come across a lot of pride, being content, and glad I'm as big as i am because I could of been smaller attitudes.


We could look at something unrelated but similar. If we look at race we can see it doesn't really matter in theory. It may come down to be personal preference for appearance........but yet it is an issue, an absolutely massive issue in different places. That is what I want to focus on. Why is something that otherwise shouldn't be an issue is blown up to be a much larger one that it is. Clearly there is an issue. So if we run back to dicks we kind of see the same thing. They aren't really that important in the grand schemes yet their importance is blown up. Women's appearances aren't really that important either yet it is blown up. So what happens at the end of the day is that yes they actually do matter. In a perfect world it wouldn't....but this isn't a perfect world.


So why are smaller ones routinely shat upon? why is being small viewed as such a negative thing. Why is it a go to insult or to add insult to injury?
Why is being large something one might be considered to be "lucky". Why would one appreciate the size they are because they could of been smaller?

Why are things not the reverse? Heck why not equal? like I said before if something truly didn't matter, we really wouldn't focus so much on it. I'm sure many men have been mocked for having one less fold in their eye lid,their ankles are more flat than pointy(visa versa), or the thickness of their shin is a little less than the average shin...oh wait no, no they haven't because no one really cares,....it doesn't matter :\ hell I'd go so far to say as most men haven't even considered that crap because it doesn't matter.


Clearly there is a problem which is the point I'm driving it. We are social creature and what others think of us and how others treat us does affect us all at some level.

Does vaginal tightness matter to you? I don't mean "matter" like "can it have some impact". I mean "matter" like "is it important?".

Is the vaginal tightness of your sexual partners important to you? Do you try to get an indication of how tight a woman's vagina is before you would fully commit? Would you ever consider leaving a relationship with one woman to start one with another just because she has a tighter vagina? Would you feel dissatisfied in a relationship that was otherwise going swimmingly if you thought that there were other women out there with tighter vaginas?

 

[Doranq]

Does vaginal tightness matter to you? I don't mean "matter" like "can it have some impact". I mean "matter" like "is it important?".

Is the vaginal tightness of your sexual partners important to you? Do you try to get an indication of how tight a woman's vagina is before you would fully commit? Would you ever consider leaving a relationship with one woman to start one with another just because she has a tighter vagina? Would you feel dissatisfied in a relationship that was otherwise going swimmingly if you thought that there were other women out there with tighter vaginas?

I don't see how my opinion matters in this instance. So I say yes and no to them all, the outcome is the same.

I should note that kegels can help a great deal as they allow the vagina to clamp down more tightly which will produce a similar affect as being tighter, though possibly better as she'll have more control. So that is probably up to personal preference.


Also given that I have primarily focused on the more social aspect of things I don't see the relevance of this question. I pointed out the physical component to demonstrate how neither is intrinsically superior to the other. Both have advantages and flaws.Yet one is viewed/treated differently than the other in social scenarios. One set is focused on more than the other for obvious reasons. We can see what an average dick looks like, we cannot see what an average vagina looks like unless we cut it out of her or use very specialized equipment.

 

[KennF]

For as much as people claim as size doesn't matter, it sure as shit is brought up a lot.

Tbh I can't recall a time someone made fun of someone for the size of their achilles tendon or the size of their elbow. I could entertain the thought if there was something very wrong with that specific part. Though why is that? Why do people not make fun of things like your molars, the heels of your feet, your 4th knuckle on your left hand? Well it in general doesn't matter at all.


I think size matters otherwise people wouldn't fixate on it. Whether they praise or make fun of or are proud of or ashamed of.

I think small dicks are similar to small breasts in the sense you can clearly sense that they get dumped on quite a bit and their larger counterparts are spared much of the criticisms and in fact are held generally in much higher regard by the general population. We could even go more general with the looks do not matter. Lol, they do.

I can't imagine insulting a man by telling him his penis is big. How could something that is at this point naturally a compliment be even an insult? You would have to be quite creative. Meanwhile small is an insult. How many women here (or men) would have the nerve to say during sex "Oh god, your penis is so small" and expect for that to roll over well? I would think zero. How many of you would fear by telling your partner that they had a big penis that they would become insecure about it?

Again if size didn't matter, why is small penis humiliation such a thing when big penis humiliation is all but unheard of? Why is small even an insult in the first place? Why is the size relevant, why not big instead?

Why would penis size be such a common insecurity if it didn't matter? Why not instead the lightness of my sclera instead. After all it doesn't matter so something as insignificant as that would be just as valid to have such widespread insecurity as the penis no?

I think there is a lot of negativity out there for the lesser endowed men.

:\ it is a topic that is usually dismissed tbh. If you do even a teensy bit of looking there is nothing around that points to it being an issue.


I guess this would just apply to males more in general given that things like height, weight, and overall body size would fall under this.

I didn't bother replying to the 1-10 because while like 1 or 2 were decent questions, the large majority were stupid or poorly phrased. I think more would of been gotten out of this thread if you just focused on stuff like 3. as opposed to stuff like 5,8,9,10.

I think you may be trying to distinguish between "fixation" and "being judged on".

Certainly people notice that which they can see and will make snap, uninformed, stereotyped judgments on everything. That is part of human process of evaluation. We take in hundreds of pieces of information and make dozens of snap judgments based on our first glimpse of a person. We use our own experiences and preferences as a model to determine everything from sex appeal to attitude to wealth to background to compatibility to emotions all from a single moment, before someone even moves or says hello.

Those stereotypes and judgments change over time and cultures.

However, that is not the same as saying that someone with big/small penis will be treated differently in court, or on the job, or while driving, or in a restaurant, or in a retail store, or in school, or <fill in the blank>.

Only in circumstances where people can see a penis or hear about penis will judgments begin.

Separately, self-confidence may be based on part of how someone feels about their own equipment. And self-confidence comes through in your walk, talk, style, and mannerisms. So, feeling meek/strong about yourself, based on your looks, albeit shallow, can translate into the way others treat you.

It isn't that size is ignored, but, the other extreme where size is a relevant determining factor in everything is just a delusion.

The traffic light doesn't change to green because a guy with a big dick pulls up to the intersection. People don't conclude contracts based on the cock size of the person opposite them at the conference table.

People are in relationships with people, not dicks or tits.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

For as much as people claim as size doesn't matter, it sure as shit is brought up a lot.

I think your arguments overlook a few points. Regarding the OP, his claim was a most definite "all or nothing". And this is patently incorrect. All women and all men do not require or even care about large penises. Period.

And the fact that size matters only means, by definition, that a particular size is right or wrong for a particular person. And like everything else, that "right" size...the one that matters, can change as time goes on. It does not mean that only large size matters, for everyone, (as the OP claims) because clearly there are people for whom medium, small, or tiny matters.

 

[KennF]

being late is not respectful at all

and will have more of an impact than having a big dick.

 

[Doranq]

I think your arguments overlook a few points. Regarding the OP, his claim was a most definite "all or nothing". And this is patently incorrect. All women and all men do not require or even care about large penises. Period.

And the fact that size matters only means, by definition, that a particular size is right or wrong for a particular person. And like everything else, that "right" size...the one that matters, can change as time goes on. It does not mean that only large size matters, for everyone, (as the OP claims) because clearly there are people for whom medium, small, or tiny matters.

I ignored wally's points but acknowledge that there is a clear social bias. In fact I even said I thought the majority were stupid, purposely so. If you want to argue with wally's points, then argue with Wally. ) I think he would get more meaningful results if he just dialed the over the top-ness back. I'm sure he could craft a well written and thought out post if he took the time rather than trying to get a rise out of people and while pointing out some obvious social issues(though I think the rise aspect burns like a sun) I guess you could say my posts are in relations to his 3rd question. 3.

Also you are overly focused on PIV when the issue I'm focusing on is more social or outside the bedroom. The only time I focused on actual sex is when another person directed it that way. In fact if you read any part of my previous post the last paragraph is 100% redundant and covers nothing I haven't already said. And ironically was never once addressed in the post you quoted that out of, sooooo............. yeah.

Think of something like fat shaming. Sure we could talk about what people like and how not all people dislike overweight or larger bodied people, and sure they can have great sex lives. However that doesn't address the primary issue of why it is being shamed so heavily and disproportionately compared to other body types.

I could jump on the bandwagon and ignore an obvious stigma and just throw out some line resembling there is someone for everyone and everyone is different thus we like different things. After all why would I care, it doesn't affect me at all? The elephant in the room still remains, the stigma still remains.

So yes as I so clearly wrote out before and in fact many times before. Small-large have their own set of benefits and disadvantages. They pair up well with different women who have the appropriate vaginal capacities. People like different things, there are even most times workarounds for incompatibilities. Penis size isn't the most important thing on the planet or in a relationship, huzzah

 

[Doranq]

I ignored wally's points but acknowledge that there is a clear social bias. In fact I even said I thought the majority were stupid, purposely so. If you want to argue with wally's points, then argue with Wally. ) I think he would get more meaningful results if he just dialed the over the top-ness back. I'm sure he could craft a well written and thought out post if he took the time rather than trying to get a rise out of people and while pointing out some obvious social issues(though I think the rise aspect burns like a sun) I guess you could say my posts are in relations to his 3rd question. 3.

Also you are overly focused on PIV when the issue I'm focusing on is more social or outside the bedroom. The only time I focused on actual sex is when another person directed it that way. In fact if you read any part of my previous post the last paragraph is 100% redundant and covers nothing I haven't already said. And ironically was never once addressed in the post you quoted that out of, sooooo............. yeah.

Think of something like fat shaming. Sure we could talk about what people like and how not all people dislike overweight or larger bodied people, and sure they can have great sex lives. However that doesn't address the primary issue of why it is being shamed so heavily and disproportionately compared to other body types.

I could jump on the bandwagon and ignore an obvious stigma and just throw out some line resembling there is someone for everyone and everyone is different thus we like different things. After all why would I care, it doesn't affect me at all? The elephant in the room still remains, the stigma still remains.

So yes as I so clearly wrote out before and in fact many times before. Small-large have their own set of benefits and disadvantages. They pair up well with different women who have the appropriate vaginal capacities. People like different things, there are even most times workarounds for incompatibilities. Penis size isn't the most important thing on the planet or in a relationship, huzzah

Sometimes I do wonder if people purposely do this kind of stuff or are they.....................................

@wallyj84 your choice of word "conspiracy" makes more sense. Something to not be taken literally but rather a humorous word choice that points at something different and leads me to believe that the reason this and other posts like it are written this way are with the purpose to mock. :\ now the posts, but more specifically the majority of responses are more sad/prove your point.

If true, well played Wally, well played.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

I ignored wally's points but acknowledge that there is a clear social bias. In fact I even said I thought the majority were stupid, purposely so. If you want to argue with wally's points, then argue with Wally. ) I think he would get more meaningful results if he just dialed the over the top-ness back. I'm sure he could craft a well written and thought out post if he took the time rather than trying to get a rise out of people and while pointing out some obvious social issues(though I think the rise aspect burns like a sun) I guess you could say my posts are in relations to his 3rd question. 3.

Also you are overly focused on PIV when the issue I'm focusing on is more social or outside the bedroom. The only time I focused on actual sex is when another person directed it that way. In fact if you read any part of my previous post the last paragraph is 100% redundant and covers nothing I haven't already said. And ironically was never once addressed in the post you quoted that out of, sooooo............. yeah.

Think of something like fat shaming. Sure we could talk about what people like and how not all people dislike overweight or larger bodied people, and sure they can have great sex lives. However that doesn't address the primary issue of why it is being shamed so heavily and disproportionately compared to other body types.

I could jump on the bandwagon and ignore an obvious stigma and just throw out some line resembling there is someone for everyone and everyone is different thus we like different things. After all why would I care, it doesn't affect me at all? The elephant in the room still remains, the stigma still remains.

So yes as I so clearly wrote out before and in fact many times before. Small-large have their own set of benefits and disadvantages. They pair up well with different women who have the appropriate vaginal capacities. People like different things, there are even most times workarounds for incompatibilities. Penis size isn't the most important thing on the planet or in a relationship, huzzah

What part of my post makes you think I'm "overly focused on PIV" ???? Never even mentioned sex.

 

[Doranq]

What part of my post makes you think I'm "overly focused on PIV" ???? Never even mentioned sex.

What could all women and men possibly (not) require a large penis for? Hmm I wonder if the answer is a purely platonic relationship, perhaps to eat, maybe to make action figures out of big dicks. Somehow I don't think any of those are the correct answer. hmmm what could you possibly be referring to, it couldn't possibly be sex or a relationship that involves sex. Nahhh that's just preposterous.There is no way you could of been referring to that, that's the absolute most illogical answer. How could I possibly have arrived at such an off base conclusion, I mean dicks aren't even designed for sex so it wouldn't even make sense to even suggest that you are talking about sex at all.

Though I should of just said sex. It would of applied to many various forms of it and couplings as opposed to PIV. Either way it doesn't matter. You are right. You never broached sex, you can't possibly talk a subject you didn't explicitly state.

. All women and all men do not require or even care about large penises. Period.

And the fact that size matters only means, by definition, that a particular size is right or wrong for a particular person. And like everything else, that "right" size...the one that matters, can change as time goes on. It does not mean that only large size matters, for everyone, (as the OP claims) because clearly there are people for whom medium, small, or tiny matters.

 

[xxsweet_spunkxx]

I mean, Wally is clearly a troll, I don't see how he hasn't been banned. I mean, he hasn't really violated any terms of agreement with the site, but it's obvious he's a troll. If he's not a troll, and he truly has a micropenis as he has stated, like, I feel bad for that. But honestly....I have given him countless examples to disprove his beliefs. He seems to think having a "big dick" is like, the easy way out in life. It's fucking not. He's a fucking joke. He needs mental help. There is more to life than penis size. Like I told him. I have seen people that are homeless, literally shitting (not sitting, but actually shitting) on the street, that had huge fucking soft dicks. His response to my answer, was "They were overwhelmed with their big dick". I told him I had been with women who cheated on their husbands who had a bigger dick than mine, and he told me they were mentally ill. He clearly is a fucking nutcase, a great comedian, or a troll. I really don't see who he is still a member. He has no clue what he is talking about, and if he's serious in what he says he really needs some professional help.

 

[xxsweet_spunkxx]

I mean after this thread, he will simply make another. I think there are a few possibilities to explain wally. either he has a big dick and is a failure in life, to where he needs the validation that having a big dick makes you successful in all other areas of non-sex life, or he is being truthful and truly does have a micro-penis but wants to bitch about it non stop on the internet. Everytime anyone, male or female, contradicts his "truth", he says they are mentally ill. This guy is a fucking nutcase. You give him evidence or personal opinions that contradict his opinons, and he tells you that you are mentally ill. A male or female gives him evidence or experiences, and he has nothing to say. For fucks sake, why can't someone ban this asshole who is clearly a small dicked bitch, or a hung asshole who has nothing to do but troll and make stupid posts?

 

[xxsweet_spunkxx]

If he truly has a "micropenis" as he claims to have, cool story bro, tell it again, but go to your own small dick forum and bitch about it there, because we really don't fucking care. What is your issue that you have the need to make post after post on a site called large penis support group? Get a fucking life man... seriously.

 

[ConanTheBarber]

If he truly has a "micropenis" as he claims to have, cool story bro, tell it again, but go to your own small dick forum and bitch about it there, because we really don't fucking care. What is your issue that you have the need to make post after post on a site called large penis support group? Get a fucking life man... seriously.

Obviously, something in Wally's nonsense works because he gets huge numbers of people to post. Your last post was the 177th in this thread. So, from the perspective of the management, what's not to like?
Why would they ban him?

 

[xxsweet_spunkxx]

Obviously, something in Wally's nonsense works because he gets huge numbers of people to post. Your last post was the 177th in this thread. So, from the perspective of the management, what's not to like?
Why would they ban him?

you're right man. i just don't get it. he is entertaining, i'll give you that. he could probably go viral on youtube if he would make a video about said subject. it just blows my mind that thread after thread that he makes, he gets the same response, and he just re-words it a different way and makes a new topic. gotta give him credit for that at least.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

What could all women and men possibly (not) require a large penis for? Hmm I wonder if the answer is a purely platonic relationship, perhaps to eat, maybe to make action figures out of big dicks. Somehow I don't think any of those are the correct answer. hmmm what could you possibly be referring to, it couldn't possibly be sex or a relationship that involves sex. Nahhh that's just preposterous.There is no way you could of been referring to that, that's the absolute most illogical answer. How could I possibly have arrived at such an off base conclusion, I mean dicks aren't even designed for sex so it wouldn't even make sense to even suggest that you are talking about sex at all.

Though I should of just said sex. It would of applied to many various forms of it and couplings as opposed to PIV. Either way it doesn't matter. You are right. You never broached sex, you can't possibly talk a subject you didn't explicitly state.

You wrote "PIV", and obviously know it refers to one sex act. Yes, if you meant "sex", then writing that would let me know what you meant.