Senate Staffer Caught Filming Gay Sex Tape In Senate Hearing Room

[Lobon3000]

Twitter is so messy

 

[JoeRoscoe]

no, all the photos are from the social media which is gone

Yes, it was taken from his social media (and, as I said, a group chat he was part of) before it was gone. And then some other images perhaps in the short time between the story breaking and him deleting his accounts. Hello? It's not complicated. None of us magically reactivated his accounts.

 

[JoeRoscoe]

 

[LPSG Richard]

No Political Discussion
while everyone discusses this person who is a political aide in a political setting!​

 

[jbf78]

Homophobia definitely plays a part. If a Dem female staffer filmed and posted herself getting plowed by a German at work, she'd get fired and roasted online, but the noise from the right would not be nearly as loud.

Boebert gave a handjob in public surrounded by families and kids and didn't even get fired

If she’s in Florida,
That would be an automatic SO registry

 

[jbf78]

Act of love in the butt

 

[jbf78]

A historic pounding indeed

 

[ParanoidRED]

Oh it just keeps getting messier and messier

Welp, gg Biden, this is gonna be used against him for the entire next election

 

[AtYourCervix10]

It's on Politico, NBC News, CNN, Yahoo News... a bunch of foreign media too.

NBC news covered it in a blurb as an "alleged event by right wing media". ha!

 

[JoeRoscoe]

At the time that was written, it was the most responsible way to describe it. Also, did you not see the mod's "No politics" command just above?

 

[darkninja]

A historic pounding indeed

Yikes. I stand by my point

 

[Nudygy]

The frequency of an infraction doesn't impact its severity. Murder or theft aren't suddenly less serious because lots of people have killed someone or stolen things. Also I think the homophobia is minimal here. People are emotional and offended because its humiliating. A representative of the US government (elected or not) shared a video of himself getting butt-fucked by a foreigner (German citizen) inside what is supposedly one of our most secure federal buildings. That just doesn't sit right with folks and it's honestly strange that anyone would try to minimize that.

If you would look at some of the shit being said about him online, you would know homophobia has this story in a chokehold. And if you’d read anything else I’ve said in this thread, you’d know I’m suspicious af how there were no cameras or guards that caught this. Also also the other guy here seemingly only cares about how bad sex positivity and public sex has “rotted” this generation despite that shit being the norm in the queer community for the last hundred years due to homophobia.

 

[Nudygy]

As a

If she’s in Florida,
That would be an automatic SO registry

As a Floridian, no lmao
Public indecency at best and good luck even getting that to stick since nobody saw them

 

[MermaidSpunk]

if Trump was in office... and this was a STRAIGHT couple having sex in the capitol...

it would have been ALL OVER the Main Stream Media as a horrendous scandal.

They would be out with torches and pitchforks.

Main stream media isnt even covering it. It's really only on Twitter.

That says a lot....

This is such a dumb take. A simple google will show plenty of MSM coverage (e.g., The Guardian, Fox, CNN, Time). I swear, some of y'all right-wingers will do the absolute least to fact-check before crying double-standards or how you're the actual victims. Biggest eyeroll.

 

[JoeRoscoe]

I can't believe his self-pitying and ill-advised LinkedIn post is still up.

 

[Nudygy]

I can't believe his self-pitying and ill-advised LinkedIn post is still up.

Who cares dude
Move on

 

[heinz.friedrich]

This is such a dumb take. A simple google will show plenty of MSM coverage (e.g., The Guardian, Fox, CNN, Time). I swear, some of y'all right-wingers will do the absolute least to fact-check before crying double-standards or how you're the actual victims. Biggest eyeroll.

They always cover the other side negatively, because that gives them ratings and they need advertisers. That is why you need independent media and not these kind of media. They need the separation of the society to make money.

Public broadcaster like the BBC in the UK should be independent that is why they were created but they also have their biases and outrage culture through human error. But technically they can send boring stuff although it is not good for the ratings.

If the media said that 10 people on X claimed this and that, nobody would watch this stuff. So they claim "all right winger" say this and that, and the "right wing media is bigoted"

The most people on the right are not even against gay rights. Just look at the studies.

NBC news covered it in a blurb as an "alleged event by right wing media". ha!

That coverge reminds me of an example of Greta Thunberg.

There was picture of a girl that looked like Greta thunberg in the 19 hundreds. The internet discussed it and nobody believed that she was a time traveler. What did the media do? They made articles aboutpeople on the internet that are claiming she is a time traveler. So these articles are a complete fabrication.

 

[Nudygy]

They always cover the other side negatively, because that gives them ratings and they need advertisers. That is why you need independent media and not these kind of media. They need the separation of the society to make money.

Public broadcaster like the BBC in the UK should be independent that is why they were created but they also have their biases and outrage culture through human error. But technically they can send boring stuff although it is not good for the ratings.

If the media said that 10 people on X claimed this and that, nobody would watch this stuff. So they claim "all right winger" say this and that, and the "right wing media is bigoted"

The most people on the right are not even against gay rights. Just look at the studies.


That coverge reminds me of an example of Greta Thunberg.

There was picture of a girl that looked like Greta thunberg in the 19 hundreds. The internet discussed it and nobody believed that she was a time traveler. What did the media do? They made articles aboutpeople on the internet that are claiming she is a time traveler. So these articles are a complete fabrication.

What are you even on about rn dude

 

[Lordh]

Fine, then Germany at least. That's not a small village cut off from the media and technology. I'm sure there are probably one or two Germans on this site.

I doubt people could even recognise Monica Lewinsky nowadays, nevertheless a twink who got bummed in a blurry video...

 

[Bottom brazil]

They always cover the other side negatively, because that gives them ratings and they need advertisers. That is why you need independent media and not these kind of media. They need the separation of the society to make money.

Public broadcaster like the BBC in the UK should be independent that is why they were created but they also have their biases and outrage culture through human error. But technically they can send boring stuff although it is not good for the ratings.

If the media said that 10 people on X claimed this and that, nobody would watch this stuff. So they claim "all right winger" say this and that, and the "right wing media is bigoted"

The most people on the right are not even against gay rights. Just look at the studies.


That coverge reminds me of an example of Greta Thunberg.

There was picture of a girl that looked like Greta thunberg in the 19 hundreds. The internet discussed it and nobody believed that she was a time traveler. What did the media do? They made articles aboutpeople on the internet that are claiming she is a time traveler. So these articles are a complete fabrication.

Most people on the right are not against gay rights? Are you fucking serious? The right is the reason we need to fight for gay rights in first place.