The $10,000 10-inch challenge

I agree that many people here seems to be significantly larger than me. But I also know what my measurement is. So I find it very strange that none of them are actually 10", that is the main reason I follow this thread. But I think that the fact that I way less than 110 lbs also contributes to my length. "Bone pressed" isn't really a thing for me, if i just place a ruler on top of my dick it is bone pressed by default, because I have no fatpad and hardly any muscles to speak of.

But since, as I have said time and time again, my size is completely irrelevant to the point of my post. Which was that if your dick doesn't reach your bellybutton you can impossibly be 10". Maybe we can let the precise size of my dick rest for now? Until I have time to unpack.

You keep taking your time to comment but refuse to share a measured NBP picture.
 
Well I hope you realize that you are literally the definition of what this thread is ought to prove.

i.e. you claim 9 inches NBP - when you are clearly under 7" NBP. So the market gets skewed when you have all these guys (like yourself) lie and inflate their cock size and then people start to believe a legit 9" is 12 inches etc. and that 10" cocks are somewhat common - even though this thread pretty much proves that 10" cocks doesn't exist at all.

I know, you're not the first to do this nor the last (or the worst) but it's still silly. Just accept your size and be happy with it. 6.5-7" x 5ish is still bigger than average.

9x6.25 or whatever you claim to be would literally make you bigger than any man in porn. Do you seriously think that's a reasonable claim to make?
I thought this thread was looking for a 10" penis?! :scream:
I must have confused it with some other thread. I apologize for the confusion and will keep my distance until I have gotten to the bottom with this.
Thanks for the information, I literally had no idea.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: slay
In terms of measuring standing up vs sitting down, does this lead to different measurements? Or is it just so everyone who competes for the 10 inch prize is measuring in a similar way as to avoid confusion and potential cheating?

also, for the curved guys who compete, is straightening the curve out any different to measuring along the top of curve with, say, a ruler that bends slightly, or even a measuring tape. Do they give different results?

Not questioning the rules of this thread by any means, I think there as fair as you can get,, just interested to know how how these slight differences in technique affect your final measurement…
 
In terms of measuring standing up vs sitting down, does this lead to different measurements? Or is it just so everyone who competes for the 10 inch prize is measuring in a similar way as to avoid confusion and potential cheating?

Only my own opinion, but I think it's a little of each. Simply sitting down changes it some (maybe for the worse), but it's usually accompanied by sitting on the edge of something, with the legs splayed outward and leaning back slightly while pushing the dick downward. It does something to that gap where your dick meets the pubic mound, and it kind of opens up and expands so the ruler can sit further back. If you simply "sat" with your body at a 90° angle, your crotch would actually likely pull inward making it hard to get the full length. I'm not even sure how you would get your dick to the appropriate perpendicular point to see how far it sticks out from your body with your legs in the way.

also, for the curved guys who compete, is straightening the curve out any different to measuring along the top of curve with, say, a ruler that bends slightly, or even a measuring tape. Do they give different results?

It's still getting you a false reading, as the outer side of the curve will stretch the skin and all, while the inner part contracts. The reading you got would only be valid for that very topmost layer of skin, and get shorter and shorter as you headed in toward the center or bottom side, so the only true length would be an average of all those numbers which is the same thing you'd get (theoretically) when it was straightened out.

Take Care
 
Only my own opinion, but I think it's a little of each. Simply sitting down changes it some (maybe for the worse), but it's usually accompanied by sitting on the edge of something, with the legs splayed outward and leaning back slightly while pushing the dick downward. It does something to that gap where your dick meets the pubic mound, and it kind of opens up and expands so the ruler can sit further back. If you simply "sat" with your body at a 90° angle, your crotch would actually likely pull inward making it hard to get the full length. I'm not even sure how you would get your dick to the appropriate perpendicular point to see how far it sticks out from your body with your legs in the way.



It's still getting you a false reading, as the outer side of the curve will stretch the skin and all, while the inner part contracts. The reading you got would only be valid for that very topmost layer of skin, and get shorter and shorter as you headed in toward the center or bottom side, so the only true length would be an average of all those numbers which is the same thing you'd get (theoretically) when it was straightened out.

Take Care
Very informative post, thanks. :)
 
In terms of measuring standing up vs sitting down, does this lead to different measurements? Or is it just so everyone who competes for the 10 inch prize is measuring in a similar way as to avoid confusion and potential cheating?

also, for the curved guys who compete, is straightening the curve out any different to measuring along the top of curve with, say, a ruler that bends slightly, or even a measuring tape. Do they give different results?

Not questioning the rules of this thread by any means, I think there as fair as you can get,, just interested to know how how these slight differences in technique affect your final measurement…
I posted this diagram in another thread regarding poor measuring...
1669089045287.png

And I would add... Are these guys dicks so fucking rock hard they can't bend it slightly straighter..? I say BS.
 
I posted this diagram in another thread regarding poor measuring...
View attachment 82843481
And I would add... Are these guys dicks so fucking rock hard they can't bend it slightly straighter..? I say BS.
To be fair, when i am fully hard i can't bend my penis at all. That's basically what rock hard means.
 
To be fair, when i am fully hard i can't bend my penis at all. That's basically what rock hard means.
That's interesting. My cock (a mere 6") even "rock hard" can be bent to some degree. I would have thought a much longer one would bend even easier given the length.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
In terms of measuring standing up vs sitting down, does this lead to different measurements? Or is it just so everyone who competes for the 10 inch prize is measuring in a similar way as to avoid confusion and potential cheating?

also, for the curved guys who compete, is straightening the curve out any different to measuring along the top of curve with, say, a ruler that bends slightly, or even a measuring tape. Do they give different results?

Not questioning the rules of this thread by any means, I think there as fair as you can get,, just interested to know how how these slight differences in technique affect your final measurement…
It is also a way to standarise the measurement. You need everyone following the same procedure to have something comparable.

If you have a curve, you can straighten your dick while measuring. It is not going to make a big difference in most cases, but sure you can. I think bending the rule is a worse idea
 
It is also a way to standarise the measurement. You need everyone following the same procedure to have something comparable.

If you have a curve, you can straighten your dick while measuring. It is not going to make a big difference in most cases, but sure you can. I think bending the rule is a worse idea

Agreed. That conversation will happen, if before a straight 10" shows up, a guy who is 9.5" or more who falls ever so slightly short of a NBP 10" with significant banana bend shows up first. However that guy hasn't risen from the depths with his kaiju crank yet either.
 
Laying down would be exactly the same as standing , as long as it was on the same 90° angle per the standing rules . Probably a little harder to determine when laying down . If. You took a measurement above the 90° degrees ( which is pretty easy to do ). then you could pretty easily short change yourself a quarter or half inch .
 
Can't speak for others. But I have a curve and I can't straighten it out while being fully erect.
That's impressive! I would have thought given the fibrous nature of the penis there would be some give to it. Example: Placing a piece of wood against the inside of the curve and squeezing the gap closed. I only bring this up because it appears longest dicks seem to be curved from what I'm reading here. So if there is zero flex... one would have to "best fit" the measurement such as making sure the base and tip are on the same plane and parallel to the scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
If this is provable, you'd think there'd be an asterisk next to photo or whatever.

Man, only in a perfect world. Maybe one day we'll have something like my UV cat pee flashlight where we can hold a piece of tinted plastic over our screens and all the fake dicks will start glowing red or something. ;)
 
Man, only in a perfect world. Maybe one day we'll have something like my UV cat pee flashlight where we can hold a piece of tinted plastic over our screens and all the fake dicks will start glowing red or something. ;)
And we all know it will be the exact opposite because photoshop is getting better and easier to use. And if not photoshop.. AI will do the job.