Drifterwood
Superior Member
Rocking a kaftan on a catamaran.
Opening line? I like the cut/uncut of your jib.
https://www.rmg.co.uk/cutty-sark
The afternoon tea looks delightful.
Rocking a kaftan on a catamaran.
Opening line? I like the cut/uncut of your jib.
If you cut it in half on the diagonal... It makes it fancy.
Which is the best for you women? Cut or uncut partners? Among us males the debateI’ve had the pleasure of sampling both
Which is the best for you women? Cut or uncut partners? Among us males the debate is widely open.
I’ve had the pleasure of sampling both and overall it doesn’t really matter to me.
It is understandable. And in truth: dudes should be a lot more considerate.Personally, if I just had to have sex with a man for whatever reason, I would choose circumcised due to the fact that there is a reduced risk of STI transmission because of less bacterial harboring thanks to the lack of foreskin.
I'm going by averages. Obviously, there are exceptions to every rule, and there are certainly many circumcised men who are basically walking Petri dishes while there are uncircumcised men who are as clean as freshly autoclaved surgical instruments. That is not my point. I'm talking about overall risk reduction per statistics.
Apparently, I'm highly susceptible to UTIs. 3/4 of the times I've had PIV sex, I contracted a UTI, even if I urinated immediately after and was straight out of the shower prior. It was miserable on top of all of the other miserable experiences I've had with PIV sex.
Asymptomatic UTIs, in particular, are also more common in uncircumcised males while females, in general, are more susceptible to symptomatic UTIs due to our shorter urethras.
TL;DR: I would not have sex with an uncut man.
My mother told me once a long time ago: men give women yeast infections.