Stratavos
Superior Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2014
- Posts
- 1,067
- Media
- 41
- Likes
- 2,798
- Points
- 183
- Location
- Ontario (Canada)
- Sexuality
- 80% Gay, 20% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I was verified and then it was revoked. I haven't felt the need to re-verify since.
I was verified and then it was revoked. I haven't felt the need to re-verify since.
Never thought about it that way but that's a good point . It keeps members from posting a penis belonging to someone else as their own
Same here..I was verified and then it was revoked. I haven't felt the need to re-verify since.
Well the verification photo in your album shows no dick at all, just you in a tee shirt with your name on a piece of paper. The first post has the instructions on what is acceptable.I have been verified twice, and twice revoked. Once, "because" (I never really got an answer), and the second time I was told because I didn't show enough skin. So - I grew weary of trying.
And that's what's wrong with the verification standards. The men are required to show full frontal nudity, and the women aren't.Well the verification photo in your album shows no dick at all, just you in a tee shirt with your name on a piece of paper. The first post has the instructions on what is acceptable.
His photo could be a woman with hairy legs, if it came right down to it. No offence @Hatched69 .And that's what's wrong with the verification standards. The men are required to show full frontal nudity, and the women aren't.
I would not tend to think so; by your same argument, photos of women in shirts could appear to be men with gynecomastia. My point is this: men can take photos of themselves that don't need to show full frontal nudity to prove it. I'd like to be verified but I don't feel I should have to exhibit my privates to do so.His photo could be a woman with hairy legs, if it came right down to it. No offence @Hatched69 .
Well it is a site about penises. Women don't have penises so maybe boobs or vag for them? There's really no clear-cut answer on this one. You can also just pay if you want gold.I would not tend to think so; by your same argument, photos of women in shirts could appear to be men with gynecomastia. My point is this: men can take photos of themselves that don't need to show full frontal nudity to prove it. I'd like to be verified but I don't feel I should have to exhibit my privates to do so.
I think there's a fair solution. The women need only show enough to prove that they're female. It doesn't necessarily mean they have to show their nakedness. I'd say it should be the same for the men.Well it is a site about penises. Women don't have penises so maybe boobs or vag for them? There's really no clear-cut answer on this one. You can also just pay if you want gold.
No offense taken. In my first verification photo, I did show my twig and giggleberries, along with plenty of other skin. But, the verification was yanked for an as-of-yet-undisclosed reason. So, I went with what you saw in the current photo. I am of the mindset that verification SHOULD require a photo of your "bits and pieces" - male AND female alike. Yes, this is a phallic-oriented site, but asking someone to reciprocate when exposing oneself isn't too much to ask, IMHO.His photo could be a woman with hairy legs, if it came right down to it. No offence @Hatched69 .
WHAAAAT? Really?I've been coming across a lot of great photos and albums posted by users that aren't verified. So I wanted to ask for those of you that aren't verified why not?
Also, did you know getting verified comes with a Gold Membership?
I've been coming across a lot of great photos and albums posted by users that aren't verified. So I wanted to ask for those of you that aren't verified why not?
Also, did you know getting verified comes with a Gold Membership?