FrankieGuile
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2023
- Posts
- 1,141
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,062
- Points
- 133
- Location
- San Diego, California,United States
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
In that context, I meant that such a person cannot be considered straight. (I'll drop the 100% because anything less than 100% is not "straight" in my book). But your first question prompts a dilemma. If a person's sexuality can change, then how does that square with the "born that way" contention? Does it not give credibility to abhorrent past practices to reform a gay person? Or can one's sexuality only change in one direction; i.e., heterosexual to homosexual but never homosexual to heterosexual? It seems to me that the same people who reject the notion that homosexuals can become heterosexuals would embrace the notion that a person's sexuality can change!Are you saying that you don't believe a person's sexuality can change? Or simply that such a person should not be considered "100 straight?"