Nick Sandell Of

[bigboaster]

You clearly don’t have any clue about history. The gays that won those rights weren’t policing language and canceling people. Quiet the opposite. The entire movement was about live and let live. Be anything you want to be. In that spirit I support and am flattered by straight boys trying to temp me into giving them money. That doesn’t mean I’ll fall for their temptations, but sometimes I do. My money, my choice.

Off topic :
Have you ever heard or Stonewall? And um even back when homosexuality was removed from the DSM? You still have far right types today that accuse the lgbt lobby of threatening the APA to do so. So again, be grateful for the "sjws" in the past that got us to where we are today. It's because of places like Hollywood showing gay people on TV that normalised gay folks to straight people as well.

 

[mischieff08]

are there any pics or vids left on this page? or is it just a message board now?

 

[Es50457]

That last sentence couldn't be further from the truth. Do you understand what a scam artist is...he delivers in what he says...and doesn't remotely have disdain for gays. By "Over the top", I mean he's TOO detailed and the language is too colorful. If you don't like him...your prerogative...but false accusations aren't cool.

“My first Jerk off & cum video. This is the first video I actually bust a nut in”
The original complaint was about this video. Are you saying that this video description isn’t misleading? When the result is that you don’t see him cum, rather just see cum landing on himself. And does this description now mean that his other video where he just lets cum land is fake cum? It was $50 to see him cum when in reality he just meant the camera was rolling as he came, even if not pointed at his dick. Then when I told him the description was misleading, he proceeded to block me despite being a subscriber for years

 

[Sammie13]

“My first Jerk off & cum video. This is the first video I actually bust a nut in”
The original complaint was about this video. Are you saying that this video description isn’t misleading? When the result is that you don’t see him cum, rather just see cum landing on himself. And does this description now mean that his other video where he just lets cum land is fake cum? It was $50 to see him cum when in reality he just meant the camera was rolling as he came, even if not pointed at his dick. Then when I told him the description was misleading, he proceeded to block me despite being a subscriber for years

Perhaps that was a poor wording. ..I didn't buy that as I'm not paying $50. But, I've bought many others that had very accurate descriptions. I've been on other OF sites that tell u almost nothing about videos they're offering. I think Nick evolved in his descriptions to try to manage expectations of ppv content.

Ppl bitch about OF accounts because models are too modest...he isn't. They complain about lack of content...he has plenty. They complain of poor quality, his is good. They complain of low interactions, he's always doing free lives and messages. Now, ppl complain he's not gay....does it ever end lol. The problem with OF is nobody can meet the expectations of all the public.

 

[ginobrouwers]

I've been with Nick's OF a long time. I don't get the complaining here. We know and he readily advertises he is straight...his GF has a big presence on the sites' bts stuff as does other models GFs. His ppv descriptions are very accurate albeit over the top. He's a genuinely nice guy. I have known him for 7 years and never heard any homophobic thoughts. He's not G4Pay and doesn't pretend to be gay. His OF is soft porn ish with the guys goofing around naked but what is bad about that? If you don't like him, fine. But I think some of these comments are way off reality. Nick is an ally as many straight ppl are.

the fact hes straight dosent bother me - it kinda makes it more of a turn on
i like hot straight guys

it annoys me that some gays get all hyper sensitive about it - claiming a 'straight guy is baiting gays'

hes really NOT , hes just selling content to an auidience - hes a model - he certainly does NOT owe anyone an explantion about his personal life ..... you paid a subscribtion to see some pics - you didnt pay for his soul .

 

[iang365]

i've been a subscriber to his OF for years, and I have zero complaints. I have loved every second of my interactions with him in DMs, and i have found his descriptions accurate and engaging. I love this guy. When he wrote that his 50$ video was his first full JO, he said the truth -- it's the first time the video was not interrupted and we saw cum hit his stomach. We didn't see his dick spurt, but we did see cum hit his stomach as it erupted. Previous videos that had cum were generally broken down in two parts: before and after, or they just filmed the aftermath.

 

[Jess13]

i've been a subscriber to his OF for years, and I have zero complaints. I have loved every second of my interactions with him in DMs, and i have found his descriptions accurate and engaging. I love this guy. When he wrote that his 50$ video was his first full JO, he said the truth -- it's the first time the video was not interrupted and we saw cum hit his stomach. We didn't see his dick spurt, but we did see cum hit his stomach as it erupted. Previous videos that had cum were generally broken down in two parts: before and after, or they just filmed the aftermath.

The last sentence is not true. People were referring to the video where he cums (fake) with the tip of his cock just above the camera. They were saying it was the same kind of trick as the video he was selling for 50 bucks.

People can support Nick for whatever reason they want. If you're ok spending $50 on a video that claims a cum shot but doesn't deliver, then that's ok. It's your money. However, you're not going to convince most people to join you in wasting money.

There's no point in continuing the debate. Even though no content can be posted.

 

[Es50457]

Perhaps that was a poor wording. ..I didn't buy that as I'm not paying $50. But, I've bought many others that had very accurate descriptions. I've been on other OF sites that tell u almost nothing about videos they're offering. I think Nick evolved in his descriptions to try to manage expectations of ppv content.

Ppl bitch about OF accounts because models are too modest...he isn't. They complain about lack of content...he has plenty. They complain of poor quality, his is good. They complain of low interactions, he's always doing free lives and messages. Now, ppl complain he's not gay....does it ever end lol. The problem with OF is nobody can meet the expectations of all the public.

Yes but that’s exactly the point. You said his description is very accurate but that this was poor wording. Something can be accurate and purposely misleading. The implication was that we’d see him cum in the video. And while he can easily say “I said I would cum in this video and I did”, it’s still misleading. Pointing that out to him also doesn’t seem like enough of a reason to block my account afterwards.

I just wanna make sure everyone gets a fair warning that his descriptions are leaning towards misleading like other OF accounts

 

[deleted7298491]

Dishonesty isn't good business. Please. That's why we have regulations. Lol

Almost everything you buy is something you don’t actually need to navigate successfully through the world. You buy them because you buy into a marketing pitch — usually one you don’t even see. And everything you buy is priced significantly higher than it costs to produce. Again, market. Hahahahaha

 

[F.U.N.S.]

Sounds

Sounds like an excellent businessman.

When did "businessman" and "grifter" become synonymous?

 

[deleted7298491]

When did "businessman" and "grifter" become synonymous?

How is he grifting? He flirts with gay men so they’ll buy his onlyfans and his personal training. How’s that differ from a company using an image of a big tittied woman in its advertising?

 

[deleted7298491]

I see you completely circumvented the portion about his false advertising... I'm not judging his fans, you do you, but you get what you deserve.

Fine. I get what I deserve. But I don’t think a straight man flirting with gay men for money counts as false advertising. Nick has said many times that he’s straight. His girlfriend is in his onlyfans. I don’t sub anymore because I got tired of it. But that’s me doing me. If other guys want to pay him that’s there business.

 

[iang365]

I see you completely circumvented the portion about his false advertising... I'm not judging his fans, you do you, but you get what you deserve.

your sour grapes are getting out of control. You created this account just to slander Nick. I’m stunned.

 

[MaxTran]

Almost everything you buy is something you don’t actually need to navigate successfully through the world. You buy them because you buy into a marketing pitch — usually one you don’t even see. And everything you buy is priced significantly higher than it costs to produce. Again, market. Hahahahaha

I see your moral compass is completely broken.

 

[MaxTran]

That last sentence couldn't be further from the truth. Do you understand what a scam artist is...he delivers in what he says...and doesn't remotely have disdain for gays. By "Over the top", I mean he's TOO detailed and the language is too colorful. If you don't like him...your prerogative...but false accusations aren't cool.

You need to go back to grammar school, because that is not what “over the top“ means. The real meaning of that phrase is to exaggerate, so you need to really think before you write.

 

[MaxTran]

You clearly don’t have any clue about history. The gays that won those rights weren’t policing language and canceling people. Quiet the opposite. The entire movement was about live and let live. Be anything you want to be. In that spirit I support and am flattered by straight boys trying to temp me into giving them money. That doesn’t mean I’ll fall for their temptations, but sometimes I do. My money, my choice.

They clearly were not vapid like you, otherwise they would never have achieved civil rights for the gay community.

 

[gr8tu]

Wait how does gynecomastia cause pain? Isn't it a mostly aesthetic issue?

purely aesthetic most of the time which sucks bc his nips looked better before the surgery

 

[MaxTran]

How is he grifting? He flirts with gay men so they’ll buy his onlyfans and his personal training. How’s that differ from a company using an image of a big tittied woman in its advertising?

Look up false advertising.

 

[MaxTran]

purely aesthetic most of the time which sucks bc his nips looked better before the surgery

His entire chest and physique looked better before the surgery.

 

[Marc Gay Harden]

After reading all of this gossip.. I'm shook just... Shook