thanks for a very genuine answer dude. I appreciate you sharing the background but could you please clarify which area/country/continent are you referring to, as different countries can have very different histories and perceptions. I can understand the logic that briefs are more revealing than boxers, and hence, the person wearing briefs could be seen as odd, different, out of normal or even exhibitionist to some extent but how come "revealing more skin is equated with being gay", that i can't understand. I have lived in many Asian and African countries and never heard this comment that only gays wear briefs from people there, and people there do wear variety of underwear, i have seen boxers briefs, briefs, bikini briefs, tangas, boxers, and so on but nobody is considered gay/straight based on what they wear, and sorry the reason i mentioned white guys, because i have heard this comment only n only from white people, as my non white friends also know i wear briefs but never heard any such comment from them. Also, next question, as we live in the world of gender equality, as we see both men n women wearing jeans, suits, etc. so, in your observation, do white people or people in general also consider women wearing thongs/bikinis/topless as lesbian just because they reveal too much.. as historically women were required to cover up fully everywhere just like men, so if men who wear revealing clothes are considered gay, then women wearing revealing clothes must be considered lesbian, is it the case? although i have NEVER heard from anyone yet that women in skimpy clothing must be lesbian, so what could be the reason behind seeing men's body different from women's body n that too in today's age? i personally never associate nudity with sexual orientation..